Lobectomy with high-position single-intercostal two-port video-assisted thoracoscope for non-small cell lung cancer is a safe and effective surgical procedure

Pain relief effect of angiopuncture therapy on patients with postoperative pain: A clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to study the pain relief effects of angiopuncture therapy in patients with postoperative pain.

METHODS

Forty-one patients were randomly selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Doppler imaging was performed to locate the cutaneous perforator. Angiopuncture was performed on the first postoperative day. A Numerical Rating Scale was used to evaluate the degree of pain before and after angiopuncture. Utilizing the paired t test or Wilcoxon signed rank test, all pre- and post-data were examined, and further subgroup analysis based on time was performed.

RESULTS

Variance analysis revealed a significant difference before and after angiopuncture (P < .05). The results of the subgroup analysis showed the pain-relieving effect of angiopuncture for postoperative pain patients at the time points of 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours was apparent (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The angiopuncture therapy approach may assist in pain relief in patients with postoperative pain.

Comparison of erector spinae plane block and serratus anterior plane block for postoperative analgesia in uniportal thoracoscopic lobectomy: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain remains a significant concern following uniportal thoracoscopic surgery. The analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) in terms of postoperative opioid consumption in uniportal thoracoscopic surgery still needs further studies.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was conducted, enrolling 150 patients who underwent uniportal thoracoscopic lobectomy. The patients were randomly allocated to three groups in a 1:1:1 ratio: the ESPB group (administered 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine), the SAPB group (administered 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine), and the standard care (control) group. The primary endpoint was the consumption of sufentanil during the first 24 h following surgery. Secondary endpoints assessed the area under the curve (AUC) of pain numerical rating scale (NRS) scores, occurrence of moderate to severe pain, time to initial sufentanil request, and postoperative adverse events.

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed in the consumption of sufentanil during the first 24 h following surgery between the ESPB and SAPB groups (adjusted difference, 1.53 [95% CI, -5.15 to 2.08]). However, in comparison to the control group, both intervention groups demonstrated a significant decrease in sufentanil consumption, with adjusted differences of -9.97 [95% CI, -13.10 to -6.84] for the ESPB group and -12.55 [95% CI, -15.63 to -9.47] for the SAPB group. There were no significant differences in AUC of NRS scores during rest and movement between the ESPB and SAPB groups, with adjusted differences of -7.10 [95% CI, 1.33 to -15.55] for the rest condition and 5.61 [95% CI, -13.23 to 2.01] for the movement condition. At 6 h postoperatively, there were fewer patients with moderate to severe pain in the ESPB group compared with those in the SAPB group (adjusted difference, -1.37% [95% CI, -2.29% to -0.45%]. The time to first sufentanil request significantly differed among the three groups (ESPB vs Control P < 0.01, SAPB vs Control P < 0.01, ESPB vs SAPB P = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing uniportal thoracoscopic lobectomy, although the differences between the two groups are not statistically significant, both the ESPB and SAPB demonstrate effective reduction in postoperative opioid consumption and the need for rescue analgesics compared to the control group. Moreover, the ESPB group experienced a significantly lower incidence of moderate to severe pain at 6 h postoperatively compared to the SAPB group.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration No: ChiCTR1900021695, Date of registration: March 5th, 2019).

A real-world experience of transition to robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) for lung resections

Objective

We report our experience of transition to robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) for lung resections with the da Vinci Xi surgical system, exposing short-term results.

Materials and methods

This is a single-center, retrospective analysis of RATS lung resections performed between April 2021 and September 2022 during our new robotic program. The surgical approach evolved over time, starting from a four-arm approach with four incisions. Alternative RATS approaches were subsequently evaluated, such as uniportal and biportal.

Results

During a 17-month period, 29 lung resections were performed. Of them, 16 were lobectomies, 7 were segmentectomies, and 6 were wedge resections. The most common indication for anatomical lung resection was non-small cell lung cancer. A uniportal approach was used for two simple segmentectomies and a biportal RATS was performed in five lobectomies and two segmentectomies. A mean number of 8.1 lymph nodes and a mean of 2.6 N2 and 1.9 N1 stations were resected during surgery, and no nodal upstaging was observed. Negative resection margins were 100%. There were two (7%) conversions, one to open surgery and one to video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). Eight (28%) patients experienced complications with no 30-day mortality.

Discussion

High-ergonomic and high-quality views were immediately observed. After some procedures, we abandoned uniportal RATS because of the possibility of arm collisions and the necessity of a VATS-skilled surgeon at the operating table.

Conclusion

RATS for lung resections was safe and effective, and from the surgeon's standpoint, several practical advantages over VATS were observed. Further analysis on outcomes will help better understand the value of this technology.

Analysis on the Clinical Effect of High-Dose Glucocorticoids Combined with Immunosuppressants on Patients with Myasthenia Gravis Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Objective

The purpose of the study was to investigate the clinical effect of high-dose glucocorticoids (GCS) combined with immunosuppressants on the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG) with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).

Methods

A total of 106 MG patients admitted to the neurology department of our hospital from February 2016 to February 2020 were selected as the study subjects and divided into experimental group (n = 53) and control group (n = 53). The patients in the control group underwent VATS, while the patients in the experimental group were treated with high-dose GCS combined with immunosuppressants on the basis of VATS treatment. The clinical efficacy of different MG treatment methods was analyzed.

Results

No significant differences were observed in visual analogue score (VAS) at T1 between the two groups (P > 0.05), while VAS scores at T2, T3, and T4 in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.001). In the experimental group, the overall response rate was significantly higher than the control group (P < 0.05). Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) level in regulatory T (Treg) cells in experimental groups after treatment was significantly higher, compared to that in before treatment and the control group (P < 0.05). Similar results of each quantitative MG score were displayed in both groups after treatment, compared to before treatment and the control group (P < 0.05). Clinical performance of patients with lower incidence of adverse reactions in the experimental groups after treatment was significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

GCS combined with immunosuppressants can effectively relieve patients' clinical symptoms and improve their quality of life, with significant clinical efficacy and high safety, which is worthy of application and promotion.