Drugs in development for small cell lung cancer

Drug conjugates for the treatment of lung cancer: from drug discovery to clinical practice

A drug conjugate consists of a cytotoxic drug bound via a linker to a targeted ligand, allowing the targeted delivery of the drug to one or more tumor sites. This approach simultaneously reduces drug toxicity and increases efficacy, with a powerful combination of efficient killing and precise targeting. Antibody‒drug conjugates (ADCs) are the best-known type of drug conjugate, combining the specificity of antibodies with the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs to reduce adverse reactions by preferentially targeting the payload to the tumor. The structure of ADCs has also provided inspiration for the development of additional drug conjugates. In recent years, drug conjugates such as ADCs, peptide‒drug conjugates (PDCs) and radionuclide drug conjugates (RDCs) have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The scope and application of drug conjugates have been expanding, including combination therapy and precise drug delivery, and a variety of new conjugation technology concepts have emerged. Additionally, new conjugation technology-based drugs have been developed in industry. In addition to chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy, drug conjugate therapy has undergone continuous development and made significant progress in treating lung cancer in recent years, offering a promising strategy for the treatment of this disease. In this review, we discuss recent advances in the use of drug conjugates for lung cancer treatment, including structure-based drug design, mechanisms of action, clinical trials, and side effects. Furthermore, challenges, potential approaches and future prospects are presented.

Does subtyping of high-grade pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas have an impact on therapy selection?

Background

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNEC) are characterized by a rapid progressive course. Therapy for SCLC has not much changed for decades, and in LCNEC controversies exist, favoring either SCLC-like or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)-like therapy. Three subtypes of SCLC identified in cell cultures, namely ASCL1, NeuroD1, and POU2F3 have been confirmed by immunohistochemistry. The fourth type based on the expression of YAP1 was questioned, and another type, inflamed SCLC, was proposed.

Methods

SCLC and LCNEC samples were investigated by immunohistochemistry for different subtypes. Additionally, immunohistochemical markers as potential tools to identify patients who might respond to targeted treatment were investigated. For validation a biopsy set was added.

Results

ASCL1, NeuroD1, and POU2F3 were expressed in different percentages in SCLC and LCNEC. Similar percentages of expression were found in biopsies. ATOH was expressed in combination with one of the subtypes. YAP1 and TAZ were expressed in some SCLC and LCNEC cases. HES1 expression was seen in few cases. Predominantly stroma cells expressed programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1). The dominant MYC protein was N-MYC. Aurora kinase A (AURKA) was expressed in the majority of both carcinomas, whereas fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) in few.

Conclusions

SCLC and LCNEC can be subtyped into ASCL1-, NeuroD1-, and POU2F3-positive types. AURKA expression and positivity for N-MYC protein was not associated with subtypes. AURKA and FGFR2 are both possible targets for inhibition in SCLC and LCNEC, but patients' selection should be based on expression of the enzyme. Combined chemo- and immunotherapy might be decided by PD-L1 staining of stroma cells.

Not all benzimidazole derivatives are microtubule destabilizing agents

In recent years, microtubule-targeting agents (MTAs) have gained considerable interest in developing novel small-molecule anticancer drugs. MTAs demonstrate anticancer activity either as microtubule-stabilizing agents (paclitaxel) or microtubule-destabilizing agents (nocodazole). FDA-approved drugs containing a benzimidazole ring (nocodazole, albendazole, mebendazole, etc.) are well-known microtubule-destabilizing agents. Thus, most recent research on benzimidazole scaffold-based MTAs focuses on developing microtubule-destabilizing agents. However, there is no report on the benzimidazole scaffold-based microtubule-stabilizing agent. Here, we present the benzimidazole derivatives NI-11 and NI-18 that showed a profound anticancer activity as microtubule-stabilization agents. About twenty benzimidazole analogues were synthesized with excellent yield (80.0% ∼ 98.0%) and tested for their anticancer activity using two cancer cell lines (A549, MCF-7) and one normal cell line (MRC-5). NI-11 showed IC₅₀ values of 2.90, 7.17, and 16.9 µM in A549, MCF-7, and MRC-5 cell lines. NI-18 showed IC₅₀ values of 2.33, 6.10, and 12.1 µM in A549, MCF-7, and MRC-5 cell lines. Thus, NI-11 and NI-18 demonstrated selectivity indexes of 5.81 and 5.20, respectively, which are much higher than the currently available anticancer agents. NI-11 and NI-18 inhibited the cancer cell motility and migration, induced the early phase apoptosis. Both of these comounds were found to show an upregulation of DeY-α-tubulin and downregulation of Ac-α-tubulin expressions in cancer cells. Eventhough the reported benzimidazole scaffold-based commercially available drugs are known to be microtubule-destabilizing agents, the analogues NI-11 and NI-18 were found to have microtubule-stabilizing activity. The in vitro tubulin polymerization assay and the immunofluorescence assay results indicate that the NI-11 and NI-18 exhibit anticancer activity by stabilizing the microtubule network.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib as maintenance therapy after induction chemotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer

Anlotinib has been approved as the third-line or beyond treatment regimen for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, it is indistinct whether there are survival benefits of anlotinib in the maintenance therapy of ES-SCLC. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib monotherapy as maintenance therapy after induction chemotherapy for patients with ES-SCLC. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was considered to be the pivotal symbol as the primary endpoint. The median overall survival (mOS) and safety were recognized as the second endpoints. Eligible patients in stable status after first-line chemotherapy would subsequently accept oral anlotinib (12 mg/d, d1-d14, every 21 days as a course). The maintenance method was continued until disease progression or unmanageable toxicity occurred. The mPFS was 7.7 months (95% CI, 7.20-8.20 months) and the mOS was 11.0 months (95% CI, 9.19-12.82 months), respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events were hypertension ( n = 9; 64.3%), fatigue ( n = 6; 42.9%), followed by decreased appetite ( n = 5; 35.7%), nausea ( n = 5; 35.7%), weight decrease ( n = 4; 28.6%), and rash ( n = 4; 28.6%). There were no patients who required dose reduction because of severe adverse events. Anlotinib achieved prospective efficacy and manageable safety in the maintenance treatment of ES-SCLC. These above outcomes demonstrated that anlotinib was a tolerable and potent maintenance treatment option after induction chemotherapy in ES-SCLC.

Inhibition of nicotinamide dinucleotide salvage pathway counters acquired and intrinsic poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor resistance in high-grade serous ovarian cancer

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological malignancy, owing notably to its high rate of therapy-resistant recurrence in spite of good initial response to chemotherapy. Although poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have shown promise for ovarian cancer treatment, extended therapy usually leads to acquired PARPi resistance. Here we explored a novel therapeutic option to counter this phenomenon, combining PARPi and inhibitors of nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT). Cell-based models of acquired PARPi resistance were created through an in vitro selection procedure. Using resistant cells, xenograft tumors were grown in immunodeficient mice, while organoid models were generated from primary patient tumor samples. Intrinsically PARPi-resistant cell lines were also selected for analysis. Our results show that treatment with NAMPT inhibitors effectively sensitized all in vitro models to PARPi. Adding nicotinamide mononucleotide, the resulting NAMPT metabolite, abrogated the therapy-induced cell growth inhibition, demonstrating the specificity of the synergy. Treatment with olaparib (PARPi) and daporinad (NAMPT inhibitor) depleted intracellular NAD+ , induced double-strand DNA breaks, and promoted apoptosis as monitored by caspase-3 cleavage. The two drugs were also synergistic in mouse xenograft models and clinically relevant patient-derived organoids. Therefore, in the context of PARPi resistance, NAMPT inhibition could offer a promising new option for ovarian cancer patients.

Clinical features and prognostic factors of combined small cell lung cancer: development and validation of a nomogram based on the SEER database

Background

Combined small-cell lung cancer (CSCLC) refers to the simultaneous presence of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and any subtype of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to explore the prognosis of CSCLC, NSCLC, and pure SCLC patients, and to develop a nomogram to estimate the overall survival (OS) for CSCLC patients.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with NSCLC, CSCLC, and pure SCLC between 2004 and 2015 were identified from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Survival analyses were performed by using the Kaplan Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression. All CSCLC patients were randomly split 7:3 into training and validation sets. A nomogram was developed by integrating all independent predictors for OS. The performance of the nomogram was determined by discrimination, calibration ability, clinical usefulness, and risk stratification ability.

Results

A total of 326,695 lung cancer patients, including 871 with CSCLC, 280,391 with NSCLC, and 45,433 with pure SCLC were enrolled. CSCLC was associated with worse survival compared with NSCLC both in the unmatched and matched cohorts. However, compared to pure SCLC, CSCLC was associated with significantly better survival in the unmatched cohorts only, while showed marginally non-significantly better survival after propensity score matching (PSM). For CSCLC, a nomogram was constructed for the 6-month, 1-year, and 3-year OS prediction by combining the independent risk factors, including age, gender, tumor, node, and metastasis stage, surgery, and chemotherapy. The nomogram showed good discrimination and calibration both in the training and validation sets, and better performance than the tumor-node-metastasis staging system. Risk stratification analysis indicated that the nomogram scores efficiently divided CSCLC patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups (P<0.001).

Conclusions

CSCLC patients presented a significantly worse prognosis than patients with NSCLC, but comparable prognosis when compared with pure SCLC patients in the matched cohorts. In addition, we developed and validated a nomogram for predicting the 6-month, 1-year, and 3-year OS in CSCLC patients.

Rovalpituzumab tesirine resistance: analysis of a corresponding small cell lung cancer and circulating tumor cell line pair

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is frequently found disseminated at first presentation and holds a poor prognosis due to emerging resistance to first-line platinum-based and second-line topotecan chemotherapy. The present investigation tested the antitumor activity of rovalpituzumab tesirine (ROVA-T), a cytotoxic anti-DLL3 drug conjugate, against two SCLC and a corresponding SCLC CTC cell line established from a ROVA-T-resistant patient to characterize the mechanism of recurrence. Two cell lines were established from an SCLC patient progressing under ROVA-T therapy and characterized with respect to chemosensitivity against this drug as well as against currently applied chemotherapeutics and for their delta-like 3 (DLL3) expression. The chemosensitivity assays demonstrate that most SCLC lines show IC50 values exceeding the ROVA-T in-vivo concentrations and that slow-growing cells and lines showing spheroidal growth or proliferation as corresponding circulating tumor cells (CTCs) exhibit higher resistance. Chemosensitivity of the cell lines is not correlated with DLL3 protein expression possibly due to toxicity of the free payload in tissue culture. The clinical trials and experimental results demonstrate that refractoriness to ROVA-T is linked to a low initial tumor expression of DLL3, loss of DLL3 expression, higher chemoresistance to ROVA-T and the putative formation of resistant spheroids by the SCLC cells.

Advances in Treatment of Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC): Insights for Optimizing Patient Outcomes from an Expert Roundtable Discussion

Second-line treatment options for patients with relapsed, extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) are limited, and even with currently available treatments, prognosis remains poor. Until recently, topotecan (a topoisomerase I inhibitor) was the only drug approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the management of ES-SCLC following progression after first-line treatment with etoposide plus a platinum derivative (EP; carboplatin preferred). With the most recent approval of EP plus a programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor, there are now more therapeutic options for managing ES-SCLC. A number of novel agents have emerging data for activity in relapsed ES-SCLC, and single-agent lurbinectedin (an alkylating drug and selective inhibitor of oncogenic transcription and DNA repair machinery in tumor cells) has conditional FDA approval for use in this patient population. Trilaciclib, a short-acting cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitor, has also been recently approved as a supportive intervention for use prior to an EP or a topotecan-containing regimen to diminish the incidence of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression. The current review is based on a recent expert roundtable discussion and summarizes current therapeutic agents and emerging data on newer agents and biomarkers. It also provides evidence-based clinical considerations and a treatment decision tool for oncologists treating patients with relapsed ES-SCLC. This paper discusses the importance of various factors to consider when selecting a second-line treatment option, including prior first-line treatment, available second-line treatment options, tumor platinum sensitivity, and patient characteristics (such as performance status, comorbidities, and patient-expressed and perceived values).

Current Strategies for Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Beyond First-line Therapy

Extensive stage small cell lung cancer carries extremely poor prognosis and adding immune checkpoint inhibitor to platinum etoposide combination in first line only improved outcomes modestly. Once disease recurs, treatment response is only transient in nature. Various strategies that are being explored include dual checkpoint blockade, BiTE and CAR-T cell approaches. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are being combined with PARP inhibitors. Other approaches currently being investigated include liposomal irinotecan and combining known active agents for SCLC in relapsed setting such as newly approved lurbinectedin with doxorubicin, paclitaxel, irinotecan or topotecan with ATR inhibitor (Berzosertib). Temozolomide has also been tested in combination with a Parp inhibitor. New antibody or small molecule drug conjugates are being actively investigated, so is a biomarker based approach. Better understanding of small cell lung cancer disease biology via high through-put genomic, proteomic and methylation profiling offer glimpse of hope in our efforts to contain this deadly disease. A table of representative molecular targets under investigation is provided in the end.

Schlafens: Emerging Proteins in Cancer Cell Biology

Schlafens (SLFN) are a family of genes widely expressed in mammals, including humans and rodents. These intriguing proteins play different roles in regulating cell proliferation, cell differentiation, immune cell growth and maturation, and inhibiting viral replication. The emerging evidence is implicating Schlafens in cancer biology and chemosensitivity. Although Schlafens share common domains and a high degree of homology, different Schlafens act differently. In particular, they show specific and occasionally opposing effects in some cancer types. This review will briefly summarize the history, structure, and non-malignant biological functions of Schlafens. The roles of human and mouse Schlafens in different cancer types will then be outlined. Finally, we will discuss the implication of Schlafens in the anti-tumor effect of interferons and the use of Schlafens as predictors of chemosensitivity.

Translational Insights and New Therapeutic Perspectives in Head and Neck Tumors

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is characterized by a high mortality rate owing to very few available oncological treatments. For many years, a combination of platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab has represented the only available option for first-line therapy. Recently, immunotherapy has been presented an alternative for positive PD-L1 HNSCC. However, the oncologists' community foresees that a new therapeutic era is approaching. In fact, no-chemo options and some molecular targets are on the horizon. This narrative review addresses past, present, and future therapeutic options for HNSCC from a translational point of view.

Front Line Applications and Future Directions of Immunotherapy in Small-Cell Lung Cancer

After being stagnant for decades, there has finally been a paradigm shift in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) with the emergence and application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Multiple trials of first-line ICI-chemotherapy combinations have demonstrated survival benefit compared to chemotherapy alone in patients with extensive-stage SCLC, establishing this as the new standard of care. ICIs are now being applied in the potentially curative limited-stage setting, actively being investigated as concurrent treatment with chemoradiation and as adjuvant treatment following completion of chemoradiation. This review highlights the evidence behind the practice-changing addition of ICIs in the first-line setting of extensive-stage SCLC, the potentially practice-changing immunotherapy trials that are currently underway in the limited-stage setting, and alternate immunotherapeutic strategies being studied in the treatment of SCLC.