Regional anesthesia and acute perioperative pain management in thoracic surgery: a narrative review

Regional anesthesia in resource-limited and disaster environments: a daring discourse

Regional anesthesia (RA) is commonly used in perioperative settings of developed and well-resourced environments. RA has significant potential benefits when used in resource-limited environments, including disaster, mass casualty, and wartime environments. RA offers benefits over general anesthesia and opioid-based analgesia, including decreased risk of complications, decreased reliance on mechanical ventilation, improved cost efficiency, and others. The decreasing cost of ultrasound matched with its smaller size and portability increases the availability of ultrasound in these environments, making ultrasound-guided RA more feasible. This daring discourse discusses some historical examples of RA in ultralow resource environments, both man-made disasters and natural disasters. Future investigations should increase the usefulness and availability of RA in resource-limited environments.

Post-thoracotomy pain syndrome in the era of minimally invasive thoracic surgery

Post-thoracotomy pain syndrome (PTPS) is defined as pain around the wound that persists for more than 2 months after surgery. Persistent pain not only increases the use of analgesics and their side effects but also causes many social problems, such as decreased activities of daily living, decreased quality of life, and increased medical costs. In particular, thoracic surgery is associated with a higher frequency and severity of chronic pain than is surgery for other diseases. The basic principles of postoperative pain treatment, not limited to thoracic surgery, are multimodal analgesic methods (using combinations of several drugs to minimize opioid use) and around-the-clock treatment (administering analgesics at a fixed time and in sufficient doses). Thoracic surgeons must always be aware of the following three points: acute severe postoperative pain is a major risk factor for chronic pain; neuropathic pain due to intercostal nerve injury is a major cause of postoperative pain after thoracic surgery, and its presence must not be overlooked from the acute stage; and analgesics must be administered in sufficient quantities according to dosage and volume. The frequency of PTPS has decreased compared with that in the standard thoracotomy era because of the development of analgesia and the widespread use of minimally invasive procedures such as thoracoscopic surgery and robot-assisted surgery. However, no consistently effective prevention or treatment strategies for PTPS have yet been established. In this review, we focus on PTPS in the era of minimally invasive surgery and discuss the role of thoracic surgeons in its management.

Peripheral nerve block and cognitive impairment after thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative cognitive impairment is common in surgical patients, including postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Several studies investigating the association between peripheral nerve block and the risk of cognitive impairment after thoracic surgery showed conflicting results. Therefore, we conducted the current systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effects of peripheral nerve block on postoperative cognitive impairment in thoracic surgical patients.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Eligible randomized controlled trials were retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Embase databases. The primary outcomes were the incidence of postoperative delirium or cognitive dysfunction and the MMSE scores. Furthermore, VAS scores, levels of TNF-α and IL-6, as well as the duration of hospitalization were analyzed as secondary outcomes.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Ten articles including 1279 participants were selected for this meta-analysis. The results showed that peripheral nerve block could lessen the incidence of postoperative delirium or cognitive dysfunction (OR=0.39, 95% CI [0.27 to 0.56]), the scores of VAS (MD=-1.35 [95% CI: -2.30 to -0.40]), the values of TNF-α (SMD=-1.13 [95% CI: -1.49 to -0.76]) and IL-6 (SMD=-1.65 [95% CI: -1.87 to -1.42]), as well as the length of hospitalization (MD=-0.70 [95% CI: -0.96 to -0.43]). In addition, peripheral nerve block was linked to a significant increase in MMSE scores (MD=2.16 [95% CI: 1.40 to 2.91]).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis revealed positive effects of peripheral nerve block on improving postoperative cognitive impairment in patients following thoracic surgery.

The impact of paravertebral nerve blockade on postoperative surgical site wound pain management in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for pulmonary carcinoma resection

Management of postoperative pain is of vital importance for patients undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) for Pulmonary Carcinoma Resection. The study evaluates the impact of Paravertebral Nerve Blockade (PNB) in conjunction with general anaesthesia on postoperative pain relief, as compared with general anaesthesia alone. A retrospective analysis was carried out from May 2020 to May 2023, involving 100 patients with pathologically confirmed pulmonary carcinoma. The patients were divided into two groups: a control group that received general anaesthesia and an observation group that received a combination of general anaesthesia and PNB. The intensity of postoperative pain was assessed at various time intervals using the visual analogue scale (VAS), while the effectiveness of patient-controlled analgesia was also evaluated. Additionally, the study examined the incidence rates of chronic pain in the postoperative period. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS version 27.0. Significant reductions in VAS scores for both resting and cough-induced pain were observed in the observation group at 2 and 6 h post-operation (p < 0.01). However, the difference diminished over time. The observation group had fewer patient-controlled analgesia activations and required lower dosages of hydromorphone at both 24- and 48-h post-operation. The incidence of chronic pain was also significantly lower in the observation group (24.00%) compared with the control group (54.00%) (p < 0.01). PNB, when administered in combination with general anaesthesia, significantly reduces immediate postoperative pain and the requirement for additional analgesics in patients undergoing VATS for pulmonary carcinoma resection. The effect diminishes over time but has a lasting impact on reducing the incidence of chronic postoperative pain.

Tracheal injury diagnosed by a sudden increase in end-tidal carbon dioxide levels during mediastinoscopic subtotal esophagectomy: a case report

BACKGROUND

Mediastinoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer facilitates early postoperative recovery. However, it can occasionally cause serious complications. Here, we present the case of a patient with a tracheal injury diagnosed by a sudden increase in end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) during mediastinoscopic subtotal esophagectomy.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 52-year-old man diagnosed with esophageal cancer was scheduled to undergo mediastinoscopic subtotal esophagectomy. During the mediastinoscopic procedure, the EtCO2 level suddenly increased above 200 mmHg, and the blood pressure dropped below 80 mmHg. We immediately asked the operator to stop insufflation and found a tracheal injury on the right side of the trachea near the carina by bronchoscopy. The endotracheal tube was replaced with a double-lumen tube, and the trachea was repaired via right thoracotomy. There were no further intraoperative complications. After surgery, the patient was extubated and admitted to the intensive care unit.

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring EtCO2 levels and close communication with the operator is important for safely managing sudden tracheal injury during mediastinoscopic esophagectomy.

Get your 7-point golden medal for pain management in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Thoracic surgery is evolving, necessitating an adaptation for perioperative anesthesia and analgesia. This review highlights the recent advancements in perioperative (multimodal) analgesia for minimally invasive thoracic surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Continuous advancements in surgical techniques have led to a reduction in surgical trauma. However, managing perioperative pain remains a major challenge, impeding postoperative recovery. The traditional neuraxial technique is now deemed outdated for minimally invasive thoracic surgery. Instead, newer regional techniques have emerged, and traditional approaches have undergone (re-)evaluation by experts and professional societies to establish guidelines and practices. Assessing the quality of recovery, evenafter discharge, has become a crucial factor in evaluating the effectiveness of these strategies, aiding clinicians in making informed decisions to improve perioperative care.

SUMMARY

In the realm of minimally invasive thoracic surgery, perioperative analgesia is typically administered through systemic and regional techniques. Nevertheless, collaboration between anesthesiologists and surgeons, utilizing surgically placed nerve blocks and an active chest drain management, has the potential to significantly improve overall patient care.

Programmed Intermittent Bolus for Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Intercostal Nerve Block With Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia in Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative analgesia is crucial after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). This study was designed to investigate whether the analgesic effect of programmed intermittent bolus (PIB) erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is noninferior to that of intercostal nerve block with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (ICNB-PCIA) for VATS.

METHODS

The study was a single-center, open labeled, randomized noninferiority trial. A total of 80 patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists I to III) undergoing elective video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy or bulla resection were randomly allocated to the ICNB-PCIA (n=40) or the ESPB (n=40) group using a PIB injection. The primary outcome was pain intensity at movement at 4 hours postoperatively using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes included pain scores at rest and movement in the recovery room, at 8, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively, perioperative analgesics, adverse effects, hospital stay, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

The mean difference in NRS scores at movement at 4 hours postoperatively between the ESPB (n=39) and the ICNB-PCIA (n=37) groups was under the noninferiority margin. NRS scores were significantly higher in the ICNB-PCIA group than the ESPB group at movement postoperatively. At rest, NRS scores were significantly elevated in the ICNB-PCIA at 4, 8, and 24 hours. The postoperative opioids consumption was decreased in the ESPB group. No difference was found in rescue analgesics, hospital stay, and patient satisfaction.

DISCUSSION

ESPB using a PIB injection offers noninferior analgesia to ICNB-PCIA after VATS.

Effects of "Timing It Right" nursing on clinical outcome and psychological resilience for lung cancer patients undergoing radical thoracoscopic surgery

AIM

To investigate the effects of "Timing It Right (TIR)" nursing on clinical outcome and psychological resilience in lung cancer patients undergoing radical thoracoscopic surgery.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 60 patients from January 2022 to June 2023 were studied. Among them, observation group received TIR intervention (n = 34), while control group received routine nursing intervention (n = 26). The self-care ability, psychological resilience, quality of life (QoL), postoperative recovery, postoperative complications, and postoperative pulmonary function recovery were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The scores of ESCA (Exercise of Self-Care Agency) and CD-RISC (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale), lung function, and QoL-C30 in observation group were significantly higher than those in control group after discharge, while the incidence of postoperative complications in observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (all P<0.05). Furthermore, time to first bedtime activity and chest drain removal, and the length of postoperative hospitalization in the observation group were obviously shorter than those in the control group (all P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

TIR nursing can effectively enhance the self-care ability of lung cancer patients undergoing radical thoracoscopic surgery, improve their psychological elasticity, enhance their quality of life, shorten the hospitalization time, and reduce the incidence of adverse reactions.

Comparison of intrathecal low-dose bupivacaine and morphine with intravenous patient control analgesia for postoperative analgesia for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

Thoracoscopic surgical techniques continue to advance, yet the intensity of postoperative pain remains significant, impeding swift patient recovery. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in postoperative pain and recuperation between patients receiving intrathecal morphine paired with low-dose bupivacaine and those administered general anesthesia exclusively.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial enrolled 100 patients, who were allocated into three groups: Group M (5 μg/kg morphine intrathecal injection), Group B (5 μg/kg morphine combined with bupivacaine 3 mg intrathecal injection) and Group C (intrathecal sham injection). The primary outcome was the assessment of pain relief using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Additionally, intraoperative remifentanil consumption was quantified at the end of the surgery, and postoperative opioid use was determined by the number of patient-controlled analgesia (PCIA) compressions at 48 h post-surgery. Both the efficacy of the treatments and any complications were meticulously recorded.

RESULTS

Postoperative NRS scores for both rest and exercise at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h were significantly lower in groups M and B than in group C (P<0.05). The intraoperative remifentanil dosage was significantly greater in groups M and C than in group B (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference between groups M and C (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in intraoperative propofol dosage across all three groups (P>0.05). Postoperative dosages of both sufentanil and Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were significantly less in groups M and B compared to group C (P<0.05). The time of first analgesic request was later in both groups M and B than in group C (P<0.05). Specific and total scores were elevated at 2 days postoperative when compared to scores at 1 day for all groups (P<0.05). Furthermore, at 1 day and 2 days postoperatively, both specific scores and total scores were higher in groups M and B compared to group C (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Intrathecal administration of morphine combined with bupivacaine has been shown to effectively ameliorate acute pain in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: ChiCTR2200058544, registered 10/04/2022.

Comparative retrospective review of perioperative analgesia using ultrasound-guided programmed intermittent erector spinae plane block for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy

BACKGROUND

The retrospective cohort study was conducted to estimate the opioid-sparing anesthesia and limited side-effects with ultrasound (US)-guided ESPB using programmed intermittent bolus (PIB) or continuous infusion (CI) and standard opioid-based anesthesia in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (VATS).

METHODS

Patients underwent VATS were stratified into either control group or one of the two ESPB groups in a 1:2:2 ratio depending on whether PIB was implemented or not. The primary endpoint was intra- and post-operative opioids consumption over the first 48 h following surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 180 cases were included in the analysis. Cumulative perioperative opioid administration was found to be significantly different between PIB, CI and control group (both p < 0.001), and between PIB and CI group (p = 0.028). More specifically, the mean was 305.30 ± 51.35 mg, 339.68 ± 56.07 mg and 468.91 ± 79.84 mg in PIB, CI and control group. NRS scores at rest across all postoperative times were comparable in two ESPB groups, while significantly lower than control group, however, scores during exercising at postoperative 3, 6, 12 h were significantly lower in PIB group as compared to CI group. A wider anesthetized dermatomes with PIB was observed at 6, 24 and 48 h as opposed to the CI. The mean of levobupivacaine plasma concentration was significantly lower for PIB at postoperative 0.5, 12, 24 and 48 h after initiation than CI. However, local anesthetic toxicity was not observed in any of the two ESPB groups.

CONCLUSIONS

When US-guided ESPB using PIB was performed preoperatively, it contributed to the minimization of intra- and post-operative opioid consumption due to better analgesia with a wider anesthetic dermatome opposed to conventional CI, whereas, it was also associated with lower risk of local anesthetic toxicity because of lower plasma concentration of levobupivacaine.

Analgesic effectiveness of serratus anterior plane block in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is a promising regional technique for analgesia in thoracic surgery. Till now, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have explored the effectiveness of SAPB for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), but the sample sizes were small and conclusions remained in controversy. Therefore, we conducted the present systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

RCTs evaluating the analgesic performance of SAPB, comparing to control methods (no block, placebo or local infiltration anesthesia), in patients undergoing VATS were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from inception to December 31, 2022. Mean difference (MD) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were calculated for postoperative pain scores at various time points, postoperative opioid consumption and length of hospital stay. Pooled relative risk (RR) with 95%CI were calculated for the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and dizziness. A random-effect model was applied.

RESULTS

A total of 12 RCTs (837 participants) were finally included. Compared to control group, SAPB had significant reductions of postoperative pain scores at 2 h (MD = -1.58, 95%CI: -1.86 to -1.31, P < 0.001), 6 h (MD = -2.06, 95%CI: -2.74 to -1.38, P < 0.001), 12 h (MD = -1.72, 95%CI: -2.30 to -1.14, P < 0.001) and 24 h (MD = -1.03, 95%CI: -1.55 to -0.52, P < 0.001), respectively. Moreover, SAPB conferred a fewer postoperative opioid consumption (MD = -7.3 mg of intravenous morphine equivalent, 95%CI: -10.16 to -4.44, P < 0.001) and lower incidence of PONV (RR = 0.56, 95%CI: 0.41 to 0.77, P < 0.001). There was no difference between both groups regarding length of hospital stay and risk of dizziness.

CONCLUSION

SAPB shows an excellent performance in postoperative pain management in patients undergoing VATS by reducing pains scores, postoperative opioid consumption and incidence of PONV. However, due to huge heterogeneity, more well-designed, large-scale RCTs are needed to verify these findings in the future.

Erector Spinae Plane Block Combined with Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Postoperative Analgesia and Recovery After Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the postoperative analgesia and recovery of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block combined with serratus anterior plane block (ESPB combined with SAPB) versus thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) after thoracoscopic surgery.

METHODS

Ninety-two patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) were randomly divided into group S (n=46) and group P (n=46). After anesthesia induction, the same anesthesiologist performed ultrasound-guided ESPB at T5 and T7 levels combined with SAPB at the level of the fifth rib in the midaxillary line in group S and ultrasound-guided PVB at T5 and T7 levels in group P. Patients in both groups were given 40 mL of 0.4% ropivacaine. Eighty-six patients completed the study (group S, n=44; group P, n=42). The morphine consumption, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at rest and coughing, and frequency of remedial analgesia were recorded at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h postoperatively. Pulmonary function parameters were recorded at 1, 4, and 24 h postoperatively, and the quality of recovery (QoR)-15 score at 24 h postoperatively. The adverse effects, duration of chest tube drainage and length of stay were also recorded.

RESULTS

The morphine consumption at postoperative 4 and 8 h and the incidence of ipsilateral shoulder pain (ISP) were significantly lower in group S than in group P. The QoR-15 questionnaire score at postoperative 24 h was significantly lower in group P than in group S (P<0.05). The morphine consumption was lower at 24 h postoperatively in group S than in group P, with no significant difference found yet. The morphine consumption at other observed times, VAS scores, pulmonary function parameters, frequency of remedial analgesia, duration of chest tube drainage, length of stay, and incidence of other adverse events were comparable between group S and group P.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided ESPB combined with SAPB is non-inferior to PVB in terms of morphine consumption at postoperative 24 h and postoperative recovery. But, this approach can significantly reduce morphine consumption in the early postoperative period (0-8 h) after thoracoscopy with lower incidence of ISP. It is a simpler and safer operation.

Anesthetic considerations for medical pleuroscopy

Pleuroscopy, also known as medical thoracoscopy or local anesthesia thoracoscopy, is a commonly utilized procedure in the growing field of interventional pulmonology and considered a required procedure as part of the interventional pulmonology fellowship curriculum. Pleuroscopy is mainly utilized for parietal pleural biopsies in patients with undiagnosed pleural effusions, with a comparable diagnostic yield to video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS) (>92%). Pleuroscopy is also performed for talc insufflation for pleurodesis, indwelling pleural catheter insertion, and rarely for decortication in patients with stage 2 empyema. Though these procedures can be done under local anesthesia with moderate sedation, an increasing number of cases are being performed with the presence of the anesthesiologist providing monitored anesthesia care (MAC). Given that a significant number of patients undergoing pleuroscopy will have significant co-morbidities, proceduralists and anesthesiologists must be prepared to manage these cases in a non-OR setup. In this article, we discuss some of the technical aspects of pleuroscopy, and highlight the peri-operative considerations for proceduralists and anesthesiologists in managing these patients including the role of ultrashort sedatives and intraoperative procedural and anesthetic considerations. We also discuss the upcoming adjunctive role of local and regional anesthesia techniques in management of these patients. In addition, we summarize the current data regarding various regional anesthesia techniques and discuss avenues for further research.

Would the width of a metal rib spreader affect postoperative pain in patients who undergo video-assisted mini-thoracotomy (VAMT)?

Background

Hitherto, no study has evaluated postoperative pain in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with video-assisted mini-thoracotomy (VAMT). In this study, we aimed to assess postoperative pain related to the width of the metal rib spreader in patients who underwent lobectomy using VAMT.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed the data of 94 consecutive patients with NSCLC who underwent lobectomy using VAMT at our institution between March 2019 and May 2022. We divided the patients into groups according to the width ratio of the rib spreader to that of a single intercostal space. Patients with width ratios ≤ 2.5 times were assigned to group A, and those with width ratios > 2.5 times were assigned to group B. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative data were collected and reviewed.

Results

We successfully performed VAMT in 94 patients with NSCLC. Forty-five patients were in group A, and 49 were in group B. There were no intraoperative mortalities, although one patient, due to respiratory failure, experienced 30-day mortality. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the blood loss volume, operative time, drainage time, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, or number of lymph node stations explored and retrieved. The drainage volumes (Day 1–Day 3) were higher in group B than in group A (P < 0.05). The postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores were significantly lower in Group A than in Group B at 12, 24, and 48 h (P < 0.05), although there was no significant difference in the VAS scores between the two groups at 72 h and 1 week postoperatively (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The smaller the width of the metal rib spreader used in surgery, the less pain experienced by the patient and the faster the recovery. Multicentre, randomised, controlled trials should be conducted in the future.