Kennedy GT, Azari FS, Bernstein E, Deshpande C, Kucharczuk JC, Delikatny EJ, Singhal S. Three-Dimensional Near-Infrared Specimen Mapping Can Identify the Distance from the Tumor to the Surgical Margin During Resection of Pulmonary Ground Glass Opacities.
Mol Imaging Biol 2023;
25:203-211. [PMID:
35831734 PMCID:
PMC10237678 DOI:
10.1007/s11307-022-01750-0]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Lung cancers can recur locally due to inadequate resection margins. Achieving adequate margin distances is challenging in pulmonary ground glass opacities (GGOs) because they are not easily palpable. To improve margin assessment during resection of GGOs, we propose a novel technique, three-dimensional near-infrared specimen mapping (3D-NSM).
METHODS
Twenty patients with a cT1 GGO were enrolled and received a fluorescent tracer preoperatively. After resection, specimens underwent 3D-NSM in the operating room. Margins were graded as positive or negative based upon fluorescence at the staple line. Images were analyzed using ImageJ to quantify the distance from the tumor edge to the nearest staple line. This margin distance calculated by 3D-NSM was compared to the margin distance reported on final pathology several days postoperatively.
RESULTS
3D-NSM identified 20/20 GGOs with no false positive or false negative diagnoses. Mean fluorescence intensity for lesions was 110.92 arbitrary units (A.U.) (IQR: 77.77-122.03 A.U.) compared to 23.68 A.U. (IQR: 19.60-27.06 A.U.) for background lung parenchyma (p < 0.0001). There were 4 tumor-positive or close margins in the study cohort, and all 4 (100%) were identified by 3D-NSM. 3D-NSM margin distances were nearly identical to margin distances reported on final pathology (R2 = 0.9362). 3D-NSM slightly under-predicted margin distance, and the median difference in margins was 1.9 mm (IQR 0.5-4.3 mm).
CONCLUSIONS
3D-NSM rapidly localizes GGOs by fluorescence and detects tumor-positive or close surgical margins. 3D-NSM can accurately quantify the resection margin distance as compared to formal pathology, which allows surgeons to rapidly determine whether sublobar resection margin distances are adequate.
Collapse