A propensity-matched analysis of stereotactic body radiotherapy and sublobar resection for stage I non-small cell lung cancer in patients at high risk for lobectomy: the results in a Chinese population

CyberKnife® stereotactic radiation therapy for stage I lung cancer and pulmonary oligometastases: is fiducial implantation still relevant?-a cohort study

Background

Few studies have investigated whether there is a difference in local control or overall survival rates following treatment with robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with or without prior fiducial marker implantation. Our study aimed to investigate this in patients with primary or secondary lung tumors.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted at the Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine of patients treated for primary lung cancer or pulmonary oligometastases with SBRT from January 2013 to July 2016. We included patients at least 18 years old who had stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or lung metastases and a follow-up of at least 1 month.

Results

A total of 294 patients were included. Tumors included 122 lung metastases, 89 stage I NSCLC, and 83 non-histologically confirmed lung lesions. The tracking methods were Synchrony® in 191 cases (119 gold seeds and 72 coils) and Xsight® Spine with 4D computed tomography in 103 cases. Median follow-up was 31.6 months [interquartile range (IQR), 18.1-50.2 months]. The two- and five-year probability of local control were respectively 92.22% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89-0.95] and 85.35% (95% CI: 0.79-0.99). The two- and five-year probability of overall survival were respectively 87.46% and 72.77% (P=0.586). Local control rates did not significantly differ between techniques at 2 and 5 years (P=0.685) (gold seeds, coils or Xsight® Spine) within tumors grouped by location, gross tumor volume (GTV) (respectively P=0.9, P=0.7, and P=0.4), planning target volume (PTV) (respectively P=0.4, P=0.9, and P=0.7), or PTV/GTV ratio (respectively P=0.6, P=0.6, and P=0.5). Metastasis-free survival and Overall survival rates did not significantly differ between techniques at 2 and 5 years (P=0.664 and P=0.586, respectively). There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities and only one grade 3 pneumonitis and one grade 3 pneumothorax.

Conclusions

Fiducial-less SBRT using Xsight® Spine is a safe alternative to Synchrony® using gold seeds or coils, with comparable local control and overall survival rates and a similar toxicity profile.

A guide for managing patients with stage I NSCLC: deciding between lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, SBRT and ablation-part 4: systematic review of evidence involving SBRT and ablation

Background

Clinical decision-making for patients with stage I lung cancer is complex. It involves multiple options [lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), thermal ablation], weighing multiple outcomes (e.g., short-, intermediate-, long-term) and multiple aspects of each (e.g., magnitude of a difference, the degree of confidence in the evidence, and the applicability to the patient and setting at hand). A structure is needed to summarize the relevant evidence for an individual patient and to identify which outcomes have the greatest impact on the decision-making.

Methods

A PubMed systematic review from 2000-2021 of outcomes after SBRT or thermal ablation vs. resection is the focus of this paper. Evidence was abstracted from randomized trials and non-randomized comparisons with at least some adjustment for confounders. The analysis involved careful assessment, including characteristics of patients, settings, residual confounding etc. to expose degrees of uncertainty and applicability to individual patients. Evidence is summarized that provides an at-a-glance overall impression as well as the ability to delve into layers of details of the patients, settings and treatments involved.

Results

Short-term outcomes are meaningfully better after SBRT than resection. SBRT doesn't affect quality-of-life (QOL), on average pulmonary function is not altered, but a minority of patients may experience gradual late toxicity. Adjusted non-randomized comparisons demonstrate a clinically relevant detriment in long-term outcomes after SBRT vs. surgery. The short-term benefits of SBRT over surgery are accentuated with increasing age and compromised patients, but the long-term detriment remains. Ablation is associated with a higher rate of complications than SBRT, but there is little intermediate-term impact on quality-of-life or pulmonary function tests. Adjusted comparisons show a meaningful detriment in long-term outcomes after ablation vs. surgery; there is less difference between ablation and SBRT.

Conclusions

A systematic, comprehensive summary of evidence regarding Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy or thermal ablation vs. resection with attention to aspects of applicability, uncertainty and effect modifiers provides a foundation for a framework for individualized decision-making.