Pretreatment biopsy for thymic epithelial tumors-does histology subtype matter for treatment strategy?

Surgical management of thymic tumors: a narrative review with focus on robotic-assisted surgery

Background and Objective

Thymic epithelial tumors, including thymomas and thymic carcinomas, represent the most common mediastinal tumors and account for up to 50% of all anterior mediastinal tumors. For early stages of these thymic tumors, complete resection of the entire thymus is the recommended treatment. The transition from open surgery to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and recently to robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has fundamentally altered the treatment of thymic tumors. While RATS has been widely implemented due to its many advantages including good visualization with magnification and three-dimensional vision, improved maneuverability and precise instrument control, different techniques have been described. This narrative review focuses on the main approaches and outcomes of RATS thymectomy. It compares the technical, perioperative and clinical outcomes of RATS thymectomy, in particular, with VATS and open thymectomy.

Methods

A non-systematic review for full text studies written in the English language was conducted using the PubMed search engine and literature was summarized.

Key Content and Findings

We present an overview of robotic-assisted resection for thymomas and review the main approaches and outcomes of RATS thymectomy. Critical points of the RATS approach, including surgical specifics and pitfalls, are presented. Technical advantages and disadvantages of each technique are discussed. The perioperative and clinical outcomes of RATS thymectomy are compared, where possible, to those for VATS and open thymectomy. Currently, retrospective analyses demonstrate comparable or even more favorable outcomes following a RATS approach in comparison to VATS and open approaches in terms of operating time, conversion rates, intraoperative complications, completeness of resection and mortality. Certain analyses also report better outcomes for patients undergoing RATS thymectomy in terms of blood loss, postoperative complications, duration of pleural drainage and length of hospital stay compared to VATS and open thymectomy.

Conclusions

Overall, RATS has shown promising results and could become the preferred technique for resection of thymic tumors. It shows good outcomes compared to VATS and open thymectomy in the current literature. However, especially for extended tumors with the need for extended resection and reconstruction, open thymectomy remains a valuable approach.

Conventional and radiomic features to predict pathology in the preoperative assessment of anterior mediastinal masses

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to differentiate benign from malignant tumors in the anterior mediastinum based on computed tomography (CT) imaging characteristics, which could be useful in preoperative planning. Additionally, our secondary aim was to differentiate thymoma from thymic carcinoma, which could guide the use of neoadjuvant therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients referred for thymectomy were retrospectively selected from our database. Twenty-five conventional characteristics were evaluated by visual analysis, and 101 radiomic features were extracted from each CT. In the step of model training, we applied support vector machines to train classification models. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating curves (AUC).

RESULTS

Our final study sample comprised 239 patients, 59 (24.7 %) with benign mediastinal lesions and 180 (75.3 %) with malignant thymic tumors. Among the malignant masses, there were 140 (58.6 %) thymomas, 23 (9.6 %) thymic carcinomas, and 17 (7.1 %) non-thymic lesions. For the benign versus malignant differentiation, the model that integrated both conventional and radiomic features achieved the highest diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.715), in comparison to the conventional (AUC = 0.605) and radiomic-only (AUC = 0.678) models. Similarly, regarding thymoma versus thymic carcinoma differentiation, the model that integrated both conventional and radiomic features also achieved the highest diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.810), in comparison to the conventional (AUC = 0.558) and radiomic-only (AUC = 0.774) models.

CONCLUSION

CT-based conventional and radiomic features with machine learning analysis could be useful for predicting pathologic diagnoses of anterior mediastinal masses. The diagnostic performance was moderate for differentiating benign from malignant lesions and good for differentiating thymomas from thymic carcinomas. The best diagnostic performance was achieved when both conventional and radiomic features were integrated in the machine learning algorithms.

Diagnostic Challenges in the Cytology of Thymic Epithelial Neoplasms

Simple Summary

Thymic epithelial neoplasms, including thymoma, thymic carcinoma, and thymic neuroendocrine neoplasms, constitute the majority of anterior mediastinal masses. Fine needle aspirations (FNA) of mediastinal masses are infrequently encountered and are highly challenging to interpret. Thymic neoplasms display a significant degree of histologic diversity and have overlapping morphologic features with tumors from other sites. However, when properly interpreted alongside ancillary studies and radiologic findings, FNAs can yield clinically actionable results. This review aims to illustrate the usefulness and diagnostic pitfalls of thymic FNAs to assist pathologists in analyzing these specimens.

Abstract

Thymic epithelial neoplasms are rare tumors that constitute the majority of anterior mediastinal masses. They are classified as thymomas, thymic carcinomas, and thymic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Biopsy diagnosis is not common, and most tumors are surgically resected. Biopsy, including cytology, is indicated when a non-surgical entity is suspected or in cases of locally advanced disease. Smears of thymomas consist of round or spindle epithelial cells admixed with varying amounts of lymphocytes depending on the type of thymoma. Smears of thymic carcinoma and thymic neuroendocrine neoplasms are often indistinguishable from corresponding tumor types from other organs. Accurate cytological diagnosis can be difficult due to the histological diversity of thymomas, as well as the morphological features that certain thymic tumors share with similar tumors from other organs. However, fine needle aspiration (FNA) of anterior mediastinal masses can provide clinically actionable information and can be used to determine whether lesions require surgical, systemic, or local noninvasive treatments. Ancillary studies, namely, immunocytochemical stains, flow cytometry, and radiology, are important tools in the evaluation of thymic aspirates. This review discusses the utility and limitations of thymic FNAs and illustrates the diagnostic features and pitfalls of these specimens.

How to obtain adequate biopsy specımen in suspected thymic tumors

Pathologic diagnosis of thymic tumors (TTs) can be made by surgical or nonsurgical procedures. About 20% of TTs had been diagnosed by pretreatment biopsy methods while the rest had gone to surgery for diagnosis and treatment. However, in the last two decades there was an increase in pretreatment procedures for optimal management of locally advanced or metastatic TTs. Pretreatment tissue diagnosis of a noninvasive TT is not a standard option but is required if there is suspect or atypical clinical presentation and imaging, an invasive tumor requiring a nonsurgical approach or preoperative chemotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy, strong possibility of lymphoma or unclear differential diagnosis between lymphoma or other solid tumor by imaging studies, or suspicion of a metastatic lesion. In surgical diagnosis anterior mediastinotomy, video-assisted thoracic surgery or mediastinoscopy can be chosen for invasive TTs whereas total resection is performed for small, noninvasive tumors. Nonsurgical diagnosis can be made by transthoracic fine or core needle biopsies (TTFNA, TTCNB), conventional bronchoscopy, endobronchial ultrasonography-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) or medical thoracoscopy depending on procedural amenability according to tumor extension. TTFNA and TTCNB have been the most frequently used nonsurgical methods. However, there is an upward trend in using conventional bronchoscopy, EBUS-TBNA, EUS-FNA and medical thoracoscopy recently. To increase the diagnostic performance of these procedures in TTs, recommendations are (I) obtaining histologic specimens, (II) combining smears or liquid based cytology preparations and cell blocks, (III) obtaining multiple sufficient samples, (IV) combining histologic and cytologic specimens, (V) performing morphologic, immunohistochemical and molecular analyses on all specimens, (VI) using rapid onsite evaluation for cytologic specimens, (VII) correlating pathologic, clinical and radiologic findings, (VIII) consulting experienced pathologists.