Comparison of continuous compression with regular ventilations versus 30:2 compressions-ventilations strategy during mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a porcine model of cardiac arrest

Continuous compression with asynchronous ventilation improves CPR prognosis? A meta-analysis from human and animal studies

BACKGROUND

The cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) compression to ventilation strategy remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the outcomes between continuous chest compressions CPR with asynchronous ventilation (CCC-CPR) and interrupted chest compressions CPR with synchronous ventilation (ICC-CPR) in cardiac arrest.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, MEDLINE (Ovid/LWW) and the Cochrane Libraries were searched up from inception to July 31, 2022. Human and animal studies comparing CCC-CPR versus ICC-CPR were included. Outcome variables were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), time to ROSC, survival to discharge, 1-month survival, survival at 4 h, good neurological function, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and other clinical parameters. Jadad Scale and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to assess the study quality and risk of bias.

RESULTS

The systematic search identified eight studies on humans and twelve studies on animal trials. There were no significant differences in ROSC (odd ratios [OR] 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.86-1.32; P = 0.55), survival to hospital discharge (OR 1.04; 95%CI 0.77-1.42; P = 0.79), 1-month survival (OR 1.07; 95%CI 0.84-1.36; P = 0.57), and good neurological outcome (OR 0.92; 95%CI 0.84-1.01, P = 0.09) between CCC-CPR and ICC-CPR in human studies. In animal trials, CCC-CPR had significantly higher rate of ROSC (OR = 1.81; 95% CI: 0.94-3.49; P = 0.07), survival at 4 h (OR 2.57; 95% CI: 1.16-5.72; P = 0.02) and MAP (mean difference [MD] 0.79, 95% CI: 0.04-1.53; P = 0.04), even though no significant differences in ROSC time, arterial potential of hydrogen (pH) and partial tension of carbon dioxide (PaCO2).

CONCLUSION

CCC-CPR did not show superiority in human outcomes compared with ICC-CPR, but its effect value was significantly increased in animal experiments. We should take the positive outcomes from animals and apply them to human models, and more physiological mechanisms need to be confirmed in CPR patients with different compression-ventilation strategies to improve the prognosis of cardiac arrest.

Ventilation during continuous compressions or at 30:2 compression-to-ventilation ratio results in similar arterial oxygen and carbon dioxide levels in an experimental model of prolonged cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

In refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, transportation to hospital with continuous chest compressions (CCC) from a chest compression device and ventilation with 100% oxygen through an advanced airway is common practice. Despite this, many patients are hypoxic and hypercapnic on arrival, possibly related to suboptimal ventilation due to the counterpressure caused by the CCC. We hypothesized that a compression/ventilation ratio of 30:2 would provide better ventilation and gas exchange compared to asynchronous CCC during prolonged experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

METHODS

We randomized 30 anaesthetized domestic swine (weight approximately 50 kg) with electrically induced ventricular fibrillation to the CCC or 30:2 group and bag-valve ventilation with a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂) of 100%. We started CPR after a 5-min no-flow period and continued until 40 min from the induction of ventricular fibrillation. Chest compressions were performed with a Stryker Medical LUCAS® 2 mechanical chest compression device. We collected arterial blood gas samples every 5 min during the CPR, measured ventilation distribution during the CPR using electrical impedance tomography (EIT) and analysed post-mortem computed tomography (CT) scans for differences in lung aeration status.

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range [IQR]) partial pressure of oxygen (PaO₂) at 30 min was 110 (52-117) mmHg for the 30:2 group and 70 (40-171) mmHg for the CCC group. The median (IQR) partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO₂) at 30 min was 70 (45-85) mmHg for the 30:2 group and 68 (42-84) mmHg for the CCC group. No statistically significant differences between the groups in PaO₂ (p = 0.40), PaCO₂ (p = 0.79), lactate (p = 0.37), mean arterial pressure (MAP) (p = 0.47) or EtCO₂ (p = 0.19) analysed with a linear mixed model were found. We found a deteriorating trend in PaO₂, EtCO₂ and MAP and rising PaCO₂ and lactate levels through the intervention. There were no differences between the groups in the distribution of ventilation in the EIT data or the post-mortem CT findings.

CONCLUSIONS

The 30:2 and CCC protocols resulted in similar gas exchange and lung pathology in an experimental prolonged mechanical CPR model.

Comparison between synchronized and non-synchronized ventilation and between guided and non-guided chest compressions during resuscitation in a pediatric animal model after asphyxial cardiac arrest

Introduction

There are no studies comparing synchronized and non-synchronized ventilation with bag-valve mask ventilation (BVMV) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in pediatric patients. The main aim is to compare between synchronized and non-synchronized BVMV with chest compressions (CC), and between guided and non-guided CC with a real-time feedback-device in a pediatric animal model of asphyxial cardiac arrest (CA). The secondary aim is to analyze the quality of CC during resuscitation.

Methods

60 piglets were randomized for CPR into four groups: Group A: guided-CC and synchronized ventilation; Group B: guided-CC and non-synchronized ventilation; Group C: non-guided CC and synchronized ventilation; Group D: non-guided CC and non-synchronized ventilation. Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, and quality of CC were compared between all groups.

Results

60 piglets were included. Twenty-six (46.5%) achieved ROSC: A (46.7%), B (66.7%), C (26.7%) and D (33.3%). Survival rates were higher in group B than in groups A+C+D (66.7% vs 35.6%, p = 0.035). ROSC was higher with guided-CC (A+B 56.7% vs C+D 30%, p = 0.037). Piglets receiving non-synchronized ventilation did not show different rates of ROSC than synchronized ventilation (B+D 50% vs A+C 36.7%, p = 0.297). Non-synchronized groups showed lower arterial pCO₂ after 3 minutes of CPR than synchronized groups: 57 vs 71 mmHg, p = 0.019. No differences were found in arterial pH and pO₂, mean arterial pressure (MAP) or cerebral blood flow between groups. Chest compressions were shallower in surviving than in non-surviving piglets (4.7 vs 5.1 cm, p = 0.047). There was a negative correlation between time without CC and MAP (r = -0.35, p = 0.038).

Conclusions

The group receiving non-synchronized ventilation and guided-CC obtained significantly higher ROSC rates than the other modalities of resuscitation. Guided-CC achieved higher ROSC rates than non-guided CC. Non-synchronized ventilation was associated with better ventilation parameters, with no differences in hemodynamics or cerebral flow.

Amplitude screening improves performance of AMSA method for predicting success of defibrillation in swine model

PURPOSE

A novel amplitude screening method, termed Optimal Amplitude Spectrum Area (Opt-AMSA) with the aim of improving the performance of the Amplitude Spectrum Area (AMSA) method, was proposed to optimize the timing of defibrillation. We investigated the effects of the Opt-AMSA method on the prediction of successful defibrillation when compared with AMSA in a porcine model of ventricular fibrillation (VF).

METHOD

60 male domestic pigs were untreated in the first 10 min of VF, then received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for 6 min. Values of Opt-AMSA and AMSA were calculated every minute before defibrillation. Linear regression was used to evaluate the correlation between Opt-AMSA and AMSA. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted for the two methods and to compare their predictive values.

RESULTS

The values of both AMSA and Opt-AMSA gradually decreased over time during untreated VF in all animals. The values of both methods of defibrillation were slightly increased after the implementation of CPR in animals that were successfully resuscitated, while there were no significant changes in either method in those who ultimately failed to resuscitate. The significant positive correlation between Opt-AMSA and AMSA was shown by Pearson correlation analysis. ROC analysis showed that Opt-AMSA (AUC = 0.87) significantly improved the performance of AMSA (AUC = 0.77) to predict successful defibrillation (Z = 2.27, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both the Opt-AMSA and AMSA methods showed high potential to predict the success of defibrillation. Moreover, the Opt-AMSA method improved the performance of the AMSA method, and may be a promising tool to optimize the timing of defibrillation.