Enhanced recovery pathways in thoracic surgery from Italian VATS group: nursing care program

Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol on Postoperative Outcomes of Women Undergoing Abdominal Hysterectomy

Background

Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol is a standardized, multidisciplinary approach for shorter hospital stay without negatively affecting patient outcomes. The aim of this research was to evaluate the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on postoperative outcomes of women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy.

Design

A quasi-experimental design was adopted to fulfil the aim of this research.

Setting

The research was conducted at Obstetric and Gynecological Department in Benha University Hospital.

Sample

A purposive sample of 148 women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy divided into two groups.

Data collection

Three tools were used: Tool (I) structured questionnaire sheet. Tool (II) post-operative pain assessment scale (numerical rating scale). Tool (III) post-operative outcomes assessment sheet.

Results

There was a highly statistically significant difference between the studied groups regarding all postoperative outcomes (p = .000). The women in the study group experienced less mean score of pain compared to those in control group on both 2nd and 3rd day after surgery. Also, there was a statistically significant difference between the studied groups regarding postoperative complication and readmission (p = .000).

Conclusion

Women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy who received enhanced recovery after surgery protocol had better postoperative outcomes than women who received routine perioperative care.

Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for women with gynaecological cancers

BACKGROUND

Gynaecological cancers account for 15% of newly diagnosed cancer cases in women worldwide. In recent years, increasing evidence demonstrates that traditional approaches in perioperative care practice may be unnecessary or even harmful. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme has therefore been gradually introduced to replace traditional approaches in perioperative care. There is an emerging body of evidence outside of gynaecological cancer which has identified that perioperative ERAS programmes decrease length of postoperative hospital stay and reduce medical expenditure without increasing complication rates, mortality, and readmission rates. However, evidence-based decisions on perioperative care practice for major surgery in gynaecological cancer are limited. This is an updated version of the original Cochrane Review published in Issue 3, 2015.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of perioperative enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes in gynaecological cancer care on length of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, mortality, readmission, bowel functions, quality of life, participant satisfaction, and economic outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following electronic databases for the literature published from inception until October 2020: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Scopus, and four Chinese databases including the China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), WanFang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Weipu Database. We also searched four trial registration platforms and grey literature databases for ongoing and unpublished trials, and handsearched the reference lists of included trials and accessible reviews for relevant references.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared ERAS programmes for perioperative care in women with gynaecological cancer to traditional care strategies.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted the data and assessed methodological quality for each included study using the Cochrane risk of bias tool 2 (RoB 2) for RCTs. Using Review Manager 5.4, we pooled the data and calculated the measures of treatment effect with the mean difference (MD), standardised mean difference (SMD), and risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) to reflect the summary estimates and uncertainty.

MAIN RESULTS

We included seven RCTs with 747 participants. All studies compared ERAS programmes with traditional care strategies for women with gynaecological cancer. We had substantial concerns regarding the methodological quality of the included studies since the included RCTs had moderate to high risk of bias in domains including randomisation process, deviations from intended interventions, and measurement of outcomes. ERAS programmes may reduce length of postoperative hospital stay (MD -1.71 days, 95% CI -2.59 to -0.84; I2 = 86%; 6 studies, 638 participants; low-certainty evidence). ERAS programmes may result in no difference in overall complication rates (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.05; I2 = 42%; 5 studies, 537 participants; low-certainty evidence). The certainty of evidence was very low regarding the effect of ERAS programmes on all-cause mortality within 30 days of discharge (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.14 to 6.68; 1 study, 99 participants). ERAS programmes may reduce readmission rates within 30 days of operation (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.90; I2 = 0%; 3 studies, 385 participants; low-certainty evidence). ERAS programmes may reduce the time to first flatus (MD -0.82 days, 95% CI -1.00 to -0.63; I2 = 35%; 4 studies, 432 participants; low-certainty evidence) and the time to first defaecation (MD -0.96 days, 95% CI -1.47 to -0.44; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 228 participants; low-certainty evidence). The studies did not report the effects of ERAS programmes on quality of life. The evidence on the effects of ERAS programmes on participant satisfaction was very uncertain due to the limited number of studies. The adoption of ERAS strategies may not increase medical expenditure, though the evidence was of very low certainty (SMD -0.22, 95% CI -0.68 to 0.25; I2 = 54%; 2 studies, 167 participants).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Low-certainty evidence suggests that ERAS programmes may shorten length of postoperative hospital stay, reduce readmissions, and facilitate postoperative bowel function recovery without compromising participant safety. Further well-conducted studies are required in order to validate the certainty of these findings.

Determining the Effectiveness of Forced-Air Warming Blankets in Maintaining Postoperative Body Temperature: A Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of forced-air warming blankets in normalizing body temperature in the postoperative period.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial METHODS: The study sample consisted of patients (N = 67) who underwent lung lobectomy in the Thoracic Surgery Service of a university hospital. Forced-air warming blankets were used in the treatment group and 100% cotton blankets were used in the control group. Patients' body temperatures were monitored using a tympanic thermometer until it reached 37°C.

FINDINGS

The body temperature of the patients in the treatment group reached 37°C in a shorter time than that of the patients in the control group (52.27 ± 29.79 min and 139.0 ± 81.93 min, respectively; P < .001), and that the perception of comfort of the patients in the treatment and control groups increased (P < .001) after warming.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend that forced-air warming blankets are used for patients undergoing lung lobectomy in order to reach normal body temperature in a shorter time.

The Perspectives and Lived Experience of Postoperative Patients with Lung Cancer Participating in a Home-Based Exercise Intervention

OBJECTIVES

Postoperative patients with lung cancer experience a cluster of symptoms and reduced quality of life. This study aimed to collect the pre- and postexercise intervention opinions of postoperative patients with lung cancer and to identify their perceptions of barriers, facilitators, and benefits of a home-based exercise intervention and its impact on their future exercise.

DATA SOURCES

Fourteen participants (aged 53 to 78) were purposively recruited from a tertiary hospital to participate in a 4-week home-based walking exercise intervention after discharge. Semi-structured, one-on-one interviews were conducted to collect data. The interviews were transcribed verbatim, and the data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. Details regarding the exercise duration and intensity for each participant were collected using a sports watch app, and participants exercise diaries.

CONCLUSION

Three main themes emerged: (1) participants' differing opinions preintervention, (2) barriers and facilitators encountered during the exercise period, and (3) the positive impact on participants' future exercise. Other results showed that 12 of the 14 participants reached the goal of exercise duration and intensity. Postoperative patients with lung cancer need an exercise intervention to motivate and guide them to perform exercise after discharge. This study showed that a home-based walking exercise intervention was feasible and acceptable; patients perceived benefits and became more active and confident about their future exercise plans.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Against the backdrop of inadequate staffing, insufficient funding, and lack of supervised exercise programs for this rapidly increasing population, this study of a nurse-led home-based exercise program provides a feasible and realistic approach and qualitative evidence to address these issues.

Agreements on perceived use of principles for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery between patients and nursing staff in a gynecological ward

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to evaluate the agreements between patients and nursing staff in perceived use of the principles of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in a gynecological ward, both prior to and following an educational session on ERAS guidelines for the nursing staff.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective observational study conducted in the in-patient gynecological section of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University hospital of Linköping during spring 2017. The study groups comprised women scheduled for elective in-patient gynecological surgery due to benign or malignant diseases and the nursing staff at the gynecological ward. The study was performed in three parts with two structured questionnaire interviews of patients and nursing staff, and an intermediate educational session for the nursing staff regarding ERAS principles, conducted between the parts of the interview. Seventy-two patients were included in Interview part 1 and 68 patients in Interview part 2. The results are shown as the degree of inter-rater agreement and reliability of the responses between patients and nursing staff in numbers and percentages, along with the difference (Δ) in agreement between the interview parts, and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). In addition, Cohen's kappa was used to validate the findings.

RESULTS

Inter-rater agreement in answers to the interview questions was high even before the educational session. The observed agreement was ≥ 70% in 34 out of 42 questions in Interview part 1, and in 38 out of 42 questions in Interview part 2. Thirty of the 42 items (71%) had positive Δ agreement (%) whereas 12 of the 42 (29%) had negative Δ agreement (%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed high inter-rater agreement in perceived adherence to ERAS principles between patients and nursing staff in a gynecological ward. This was further improved by an educational session for the staff concerning ERAS guidelines. This might indicate the importance of repeated educational sessions to maintain high compliance with ERAS principles.

[Proper Selection of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Programs between the Medical Service and Medical Intervence - Is It Time to Do?]

加速康复外科（enhanced recovery after surgery, ERAS）理念诞生与微创外科技术进步密切相关。ERAS发展过程中利用技术，又融入人文因素，使其高于技术，而丰富ERAS的内涵和外延。结合近年ERAS在外科各领域的进展，总结ERAS临床应用的现状与策略：一是微创技术进步使ERAS理念的临床应用成为必然；二是外科学理论与技术的发展，深入与扩大了ERAS的内涵与外延；三是ERAS临床应用需要我们更新观念；四是ERAS的临床实践需要在医疗服务和医疗干预之间合理选择；五是ERAS临床应用加减之间应用的现实问题与策略。从而深入理解ERAS的真正临床意义，更好地指导临床实践。