Appropriate lymphadenectomy significantly reduced recurrence after segmentectomy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Proton and carbon ion radiotherapy for operable early-stage lung cancer; a prospective nationwide registry

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To investigate the toxicity and survival outcomes of proton and carbon ion radiotherapy for patients with operable early-stage lung cancer who are eligible for lobectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter nationwide prospective cohort study included patients with operable early-stage lung cancer. Proton and carbon ion radiotherapy was performed according to the schedule stipulated in the unified treatment policy. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related toxicities were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 274 patients were enrolled and included in efficacy and safety analyses. The most common tumor type was adenocarcinoma (44 %), while 105 cases (38 %) were not histologically confirmed or diagnosed clinically. Overall, 250 (91 %) of the 274 patients had tumors that were peripherally situated, while 138 (50 %) and 136 (50 %) patients were treated by proton and carbon ion radiotherapy, respectively. The median follow-up time for all censored patients was 42.8 months (IQR 36.7-49.0). Grade 3 or severe treatment-related toxicity was observed in 4 cases (1.5 %). Three-year PFS was 80.5 % (95 % CI: 75.7 %-85.5 %) and OS was 92.5 % (95 % CI: 89.3 %-95.8 %). Pathological confirmation and clinical stage were factors significantly associated with PFS, while tumor location and particle-ion type were not. Meanwhile, clinical stage was significantly associated with OS, but pathological confirmation, tumor location, and particle-ion type were not.

CONCLUSIONS

Particle therapy for operable early-stage lung cancer resulted in excellent 3-year OS and PFS in each subset. In this disease context, proton and carbon ion beam therapies are feasible alternatives to curative surgery.

Impact of number of dissected lymph nodes on recurrence and survival following thoracoscopic segmentectomy for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify the impact of number of dissected lymph nodes during thoracoscopic segmentectomy on recurrence and survival of clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed data from prospectively collected consecutive thoracoscopic segmentectomies conducted between June 2008 and September 2023 at a single institution. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test assessed OS. Fine-Gray's test assessed specific death in a competing risk model. The logistic regression model was utilized to predict recurrence, while the Cox regression model was employed to analyse overall survival (OS). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 227 patients were included in the final analyses. The mean follow-up was 38.4 months (standard deviation 35.8). Among all patients, 37 patients (16.3 %) experienced recurrence and 51 (22.5 %) deceased during the follow-up period. The median number of dissected lymph nodes was 9 (interquartile range (IQR) 6-12). No statistical difference in recurrence rate and 5-year OS was observed between cases with dissected lymph nodes > 9 and ≤ 9 (14.6 % vs. 17.6 %, p = 0.549; 75.5 % vs. 69.5 %, p = 0.760). On multivariable analysis, body mass index (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, p = 0.002), Charlson Comorbidity index (OR 1.28, p = 0.002), synchronous pulmonary cancer (OR 3.05, p = 0.019), and tumour size (OR 1.04, p = 0.044) increased of the recurrence rate, while percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (hazard ratio (HR) 1.09, p = 0.048), history of smoking (HR 1.02, p = 0.009), and solid nodule (HR 1.56, p = 0.010) was related to poorer survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, number of dissected lymph nodes did not impact recurrence rate or overall survival after thoracoscopic segmentectomy for clinical stage I NSCLC.

Lung Segmentectomy in NSCLC Surgery

Current guidelines recommend surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The standard treatment for patients with cT1N0 NSCLC has been lobectomy with lymph-node dissection, with sublobar resection used only in patients with inadequate cardio-respiratory reserve, with poor performance status, or who are elderly. In 1995, the Lung Cancer Study Group published the results of a randomized, prospective trial demonstrating the superiority of lobectomy compared with sublobar resection. From then on, wedge resection and segmentectomy were reserved exclusively for patients with poor functional reserve who could not tolerate lobectomy. Therefore, the exact role of segmentectomy has been controversial over the past 20 years. Recently, the randomized controlled trial JCOG0802/WJOG4607L demonstrated that segmentectomy was superior to lobectomy in patients with stage IA NSCLC (<2 cm and CTR < 0.5) in terms of both overall-survival and post-operative lung function. Based on these results, segmentectomy should be considered the standard surgical procedure for this patient group. In 2023, the randomized phase III CALGB 140503 (Alliance) trial demonstrated the efficacy and non-inferiority of sublobar resection, including wedge resection, for clinical stage IA NSCLC with tumor diameter of < 2 cm. This article is a narrative review of the current role of segmentectomy in lung cancer treatment and summarizes the most relevant studies in this context.

Thoracoscopic complex basilar segmentectomies: an analysis of 63 procedures

Background

Thoracoscopic complex basilar segmentectomies are technically demanding and challenging. We review our experience to check whether this complexity can lead to specific surgical issues or increased post-operative morbidity.

Methods

Complex basilar segmentectomies were defined as the anatomical resection of at least one segment composing the basilar pyramid, excluding S⁶. Data of patients who had an intention-to-treat thoracoscopic complex basilar segmentectomy were retrospectively collected from 2007 to 2019: indications, preoperative assessment, clinical features, operative technical aspects and early post-operative outcome.

Results

Sixty-three patients, 26 men (41%) and 37 women (59%) with a median age of 66 years and a median body mass index (BMI) of 26 kg/m2 were included. Interventions performed were mostly S⁹⁺¹⁰ (n=32) and S⁸ (n=12) segmentectomies. Forty-five planned operations (71%) were completed. Extension to a larger resection was necessary in 17 patients (27%) and 4 patients underwent conversion to open surgery (6%). Median operative time was 168 minutes with a median intraoperative bleeding of 30 mL. Complications occurred in 11 patients (17%). There was no mortality. Median length of pleural drainage was 2 days (range, 1–2 days) and median hospital stay 4 days.

Conclusions

The extension rate of complex basilar segmentectomy is higher than that of other sublobar resections but their post-operative morbidity is identical.

Uniportal VATS approach to sub-lobar anatomic resections: literature review and personal experience

Surgical scientific literature contains relatively little information regarding the surgical outcomes of anatomic sublobar resections performed with the uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) technique. This paper attempts to evaluate the role of U-VATS segmentectomies in the landscape of a minimally invasive approach to the treatment of early stage non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Lobectomy does not confer survival advantage over segmentectomy for non-small cell lung cancer with unsuspected nodal disease

OBJECTIVE

Conversion to lobectomy is typically performed when positive lymph nodes are found during intentional segmentectomy. Our objective was to evaluate survival after lobectomy and segmentectomy in patients with unsuspected nodal metastases.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with clinical T1N0, pathological N1/N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent either lobectomy or segmentectomy. Survival differences between the 2 groups were evaluated using a propensity score model. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate predictors of overall survival, including adjuvant treatment. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 21.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY).

RESULTS

Between 2004 and 2015, unsuspected pathological N1 disease for clinical T1N0M0 NSCLC was found in 2.5% (228/9118) and 6.7% (8915/132,604) of patients who underwent segmentectomy and lobectomy, respectively. The incidence of unsuspected pathological N2 disease for clinical T1N0M0 NSCLC was 2.4% (224/9118) after segmentectomy and 3.9% (5192/132,604) after lobectomy. Using propensity matched pairs (227 pairs for N1 and 215 for N2), segmentectomy showed equivalent 5-year survival compared with lobectomy for the N1 group (41.9% vs 44.3%; P = .35), and N2 group (41.6% vs 37.2%; P = .99). In a multivariable model, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with better survival of patients with unsuspected N1 (hazard ratio, 0.613; 95% confidence interval, 0.536-0.700; P < .001) and N2 (hazard ratio, 0.684; 95% confidence interval, 0.583-0.802; P < .001) nodal metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival is similar between lobectomy and segmentectomy for clinical T1N0 and unsuspected pathological N1/N2 nodal metastases. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improves survival in patients with lymph node metastasis (N1/N2) independent of the type of anatomic lung resection.

Current indications and outcomes for thoracoscopic segmentectomy for early stage lung cancer

Management of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is evolving as the epidemiology of NSCLC has changed due to decreased rates of smoking in the general population, the development of screening programs and advancements in imaging modalities. Surgical technique is also evolving as a result of changes in instrumentation. Segmentectomy for early stage NSCLC has the advantage of preservation of lung function. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) segmentectomy is a safe option for surgeons already experienced in VATS lobectomy and offers comparable oncological benefit with better quality of life in selected patients. In this article, we will examine the role of segmentectomy and VATS for early stage NSCLC.