Multimodality therapy in subclassified stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer patients according to the Robinson classification: heterogeneity and management

Operative versus Nonoperative Treatment in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Recommended for Surgery

Background

There is currently limited evidence for a correlation between the recommended operation and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

NSCLC patients with stages III and IV, recommended for operation, were identified in the US National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER).We used propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to ensure the robustness of our findings. The cumulative rates of death were compared between patients with and without recommended operations using the Kaplan-Meier curves.

Results

Operation was recommended for 3331 patients but was not performed in 912 (27.4%) patients (then on-operative group). After PSM, 553 pairs matched. Compared to the nonoperative group, the hazard ratios (HRs) in the operative group were 0.46 (95% CI 0.23-0.95 and p=0.037) in stage IIIA and 0.54 (95% CI 0.42-0.68 and p < 0.001) in stage IVA. However, in stages IIIB, IIIC, and IVB, the recommended operative group was not associated with better OS. The OS was not different in stage IIIA-N2, stage IVA-N1, and stage IVA-N3 patients between groups (p=0.28, p=0.14, and p=0.79, respectively). Moreover, the recommended operative group had better OS than the nonoperative group in stage IIIA-N0 (p=0.00085), stage IIIA-N1 (p=0.009), stage IVA-N0 (p < 0.001), and stage IVA-N2 (p=0.034).

Conclusion

Compared to the nonoperative group, recommended operation improved survival in NSCLC patients with stage IIIA-N0, stage IIIA-N1, stage IVA-N0, and stage IVA-N2. However, in stages IIIA-N2, IIIB, IIIC, IVA-N1, IVA-N3, and IVB, recommended operation did not lead to significantly improved survival time.

Resectable IIIA-N2 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): In Search for the Proper Treatment

Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer accounts for one third of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at the time of initial diagnosis and presents with a wide range of clinical and pathological heterogeneity. To date, the combined multimodality approach involving both local and systemic control is the gold standard for these patients, since occult distant micrometastatic disease should always be suspected. With the rapid increase in treatment options, the need for an interdisciplinary discussion involving oncologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists and radiologists has become essential. Surgery should be recommended to patients with non-bulky, discrete, or single-level N2 involvement and be included in the multimodality treatment. Resectable stage IIIA patients have been the subject of a number of clinical trials and retrospective analysis, discussing the efficiency and survival benefits on patients treated with the available therapeutic approaches. However, most of them have some limitations due to their retrospective nature, lack of exact pretreatment staging, and the involvement of heterogeneous populations leading to the awareness that each patient should undergo a tailored therapy in light of the nature of his tumor, its extension and his performance status.

Validation of the Proposed cN2 Subclassification in the Eighth Edition of the IASLC Staging System: A Prospective Phase II Multicenter Study

Introduction

Surgery for N2 stage IIIA NSCLC is not recommended in major guidelines. Nevertheless, it has been noted that single-station N2 may have a better prognosis than multistation N2 and that surgery can be performed as the main therapeutic option.

Methods

We conducted a prospective phase II study for single-station clinical N2 (cN2) NSCLC to evaluate the efficacy and safety of surgical resection without induction therapy. Complete resection with lobectomy, bilobectomy, or pneumonectomy followed by ipsilateral mediastinal lymphadenectomy was performed in 32 of 34 enrolled patients, whereas the remaining two patients underwent incomplete resection. Three-quarters of the patients underwent subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy.

Results

The 5-year overall survival rate was 58.5% (95% confidence interval: 41.9–75.4) for all 34 patients, and eight patients (23.5%) with pN0 or pN1 seemed to have been enrolled. The 5-year overall survival rates for single-station cN2 without and with hilar node enlargement were 81.3% and 37.5%, respectively (p = 0.025). Surgical mortality was 0% for all, and no considerable perioperative complications were noted; however, two patients died of interstitial pneumonia and unknown cause within 3 months after surgical resection.

Conclusions

This is the very first prospective study on the surgical approach for cN2 NSCLC, and our result partially validated the proposed classification of the N descriptor in the new staging system. The treatment for single-station cN2 without hilar node enlargement would better if it were similar to that for cN1 disease. Induction chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy may not be needed for such an entity.

Oral vinorelbine plus cisplatin with concomitant radiotherapy as induction therapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: Results of a single-arm prospective cohort study

Background

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is an optimal recommended treatment for stage III non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Herein, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of oral vinorelbine plus cisplatin with concomitant radiotherapy for stage III NSCLC.

Methods

This prospective, open‐label, single‐arm, observational cohort study was performed between January 2010 and September 2016. Patients were treated with two cycles of chemotherapy with 60 mg/m² intravenous cisplatin on day 1 and 50 mg/m² oral vinorelbine on days 1, 8, and 15; radiotherapy was administered concurrently from day 1 when chemotherapy was initiated. A total dose of 66–70 Gy radiotherapy was delivered in daily fractions of 2 Gy for 6.5–7 consecutive weeks. The tumor response was assessed after completing concomitant treatment.

Results

A total of 58 patients were enrolled and analyzed; 31 patients had stage IIIA NSCLC and 27 had stage IIIB NSCLC. After induction CCRT, 31 patients achieved an objective response (complete response in one and partial response in 30; the response rate was 53.4%). The median progression‐free survival was 6.73 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.42–7.91), duration of response was 12.30 months (95% CI, 5.59–19.01), and overall survival was 24.83 months (95% CI, 19.26–30.21). No treatment‐related mortality was observed, and neutropenia was the most common grade 3 and 4 treatment‐related toxicity (11 patients; 18.9%).

Conclusions

CCRT with the weekly regimen of oral vinorelbine plus triweekly cisplatin was effective and safe for stage III NSCLC.