The developing role of FDG PET imaging for prognostication and radiotherapy target volume delineation in non-small cell lung cancer

Joint EANM/SNMMI/ESTRO practice recommendations for the use of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT external beam radiation treatment planning in lung cancer V1.0

Purpose

2-[¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT is of utmost importance for radiation treatment (RT) planning and response monitoring in lung cancer patients, in both non-small and small cell lung cancer (NSCLC and SCLC). This topic has been addressed in guidelines composed by experts within the field of radiation oncology. However, up to present, there is no procedural guideline on this subject, with involvement of the nuclear medicine societies.

Methods

A literature review was performed, followed by a discussion between a multidisciplinary team of experts in the different fields involved in the RT planning of lung cancer, in order to guide clinical management. The project was led by experts of the two nuclear medicine societies (EANM and SNMMI) and radiation oncology (ESTRO).

Results and conclusion

This guideline results from a joint and dynamic collaboration between the relevant disciplines for this topic. It provides a worldwide, state of the art, and multidisciplinary guide to 2-[¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT RT planning in NSCLC and SCLC. These practical recommendations describe applicable updates for existing clinical practices, highlight potential flaws, and provide solutions to overcome these as well. Finally, the recent developments considered for future application are also reviewed.

Changes in treatment intent and target definition for preoperative radiotherapy after 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in rectal cancer: A Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) on changes in treatment plan and target definition for preoperative radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.

METHODS

Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were searched up to November 2020 for all studies investigating the role of preoperative FDG PET in patients who underwent neoadjuvant radiotherapy before curative-intent surgery. The proportion of patients whose treatment plan (curative vs. palliative intent) or target definition was changed after FDG PET was analyzed. A random-effects model was used for pooled analysis. The change in target definition was compared between conventional radiological imaging-based target volume [gross tumor volume (GTV) or planning target volume (PTV)] and PET-based target volume (GTV or PTV) using the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 336 patients from twelve studies were included. In eight studies, PET changed either the treatment intent or target definition in 24.8% of patients (95% CI 15.1% to 37.9%, I² = 69%). In ten studies, the PET-based GTV was lower than the conventional imaging-based target volume (SMD -7.0, 95% CI -1.39 to -0.01). However, there was no significant difference between conventional imaging-based and PET-based PTV (SMD -0.07, 95% CI -0.75 to 0.62). In six studies evaluating the initial staging based on PET, the initial staging (nodal or metastasis status) was changed in 53 of 229 patients (23.1%). Newly detected or additional distant metastases were identified in 22 patients (9.6%) after FDG PET.

CONCLUSION

The use of FDG PET influences radiotherapy planning in a fourth of patients with rectal cancer. FDG PET can provide additive information for accurate tumor delineation, although PET-based PTV did not significantly change. These findings suggest that FDG PET may be beneficial to patients with rectal cancer before establishing a radiotherapy plan.

PET-Based Volumetric Biomarkers for Risk Stratification of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Despite the recent advances in lung cancer biology, molecular pathology, and treatment, this malignancy remains the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common form found at diagnosis. Accurate staging of the disease is a fundamental prognostic factor that correctly predicts progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of NSCLC patients. However, outcome of patients within each TNM staging group can change widely highlighting the need to identify additional prognostic biomarkers to better stratify patients on the basis of risk. 18F-FDG PET/CT plays an essential role in staging, evaluation of treatment response, and tumoral target delineation in NSCLC patients. Moreover, a number of studies showed the prognostic role of imaging parameters derived from PET images, such as metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). These parameters represent three-dimensional PET-based measurements providing information on both tumor volume and metabolic activity and previous studies reported their ability to predict OS and PFS of NSCLC patients. This review will primarily focus on the studies that showed the prognostic and predictive role of MTV and TLG in NSCLC patients, addressing also their potential utility in the new era of immunotherapy of NSCLC.

Convolutional Neural Networks in Predicting Nodal and Distant Metastatic Potential of Newly Diagnosed Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer on FDG PET Images

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess, by analyzing features of the primary tumor with ¹⁸F-FDG PET, the utility of deep machine learning with a convolutional neural network (CNN) in predicting the potential of newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to metastasize to lymph nodes or distant sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Consecutively registered patients with newly diagnosed, untreated NSCLC were retrospectively included in a single-center study. PET images were segmented with local image features extraction software, and data were used for CNN training and validation after data augmentation strategies were used. The standard of reference for designation of N category was invasive lymph node sampling or 6-month follow-up imaging. Distant metastases developing during the study follow-up period were assessed by imaging (CT or PET/CT), in tissue obtained from new suspected sites of disease, and according to the treating oncologist's designation. RESULTS. A total of 264 patients with NSCLC participated in follow-up for a median of 25.2 months (range, 6-43 months). N category designations were available for 223 of 264 (84.5%) patients, and M category for all 264. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CNN for predicting node positivity were 0.74 ± 0.32, 0.84 ± 0.16, and 0.80 ± 0.17. The corresponding values for predicting distant metastases were 0.45 ± 0.08, 0.79 ± 0.06, and 0.63 ± 0.05. CONCLUSION. This study showed that using a CNN to analyze segmented PET images of patients with previously untreated NSCLC can yield moderately high accuracy for designation of N category, although this may be insufficient to preclude invasive lymph node sampling. The sensitivity of the CNN in predicting distant metastases is fairly poor, although specificity is moderately high.

Robust, independent and relevant prognostic 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography radiomics features in non-small cell lung cancer: Are there any?

In locally advanced lung cancer, established baseline clinical variables show limited prognostic accuracy and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) radiomics features may increase accuracy for optimal treatment selection. Their robustness and added value relative to current clinical factors are unknown. Hence, we identify robust and independent PET radiomics features that may have complementary value in predicting survival endpoints. A 4D PET dataset (n = 70) was used for assessing the repeatability (Bland-Altman analysis) and independence of PET radiomics features (Spearman rank: |ρ|<0.5). Two 3D PET datasets combined (n = 252) were used for training and validation of an elastic net regularized generalized logistic regression model (GLM) based on a selection of clinical and robust independent PET radiomics features (GLM_all). The fitted model performance was externally validated (n = 40). The performance of GLM_all (measured with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUC) was highest in predicting 2-year overall survival (0.66±0.07). No significant improvement was observed for GLM_all compared to a model containing only PET radiomics features or only clinical variables for any clinical endpoint. External validation of GLM_all led to AUC values no higher than 0.55 for any clinical endpoint. In this study, robust independent FDG PET radiomics features did not have complementary value in predicting survival endpoints in lung cancer patients. Improving risk stratification and clinical decision making based on clinical variables and PET radiomics features has still been proven difficult in locally advanced lung cancer patients.

Task Group 174 Report: Utilization of [18 F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography ([18 F]FDG-PET) in Radiation Therapy

The use of positron emission tomography (PET) in radiation therapy (RT) is rapidly increasing in the areas of staging, segmentation, treatment planning, and response assessment. The most common radiotracer is ¹⁸ F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([¹⁸ F]FDG), a glucose analog with demonstrated efficacy in cancer diagnosis and staging. However, diagnosis and RT planning are different endeavors with unique requirements, and very little literature is available for guiding physicists and clinicians in the utilization of [¹⁸ F]FDG-PET in RT. The two goals of this report are to educate and provide recommendations. The report provides background and education on current PET imaging systems, PET tracers, intensity quantification, and current utilization in RT (staging, segmentation, image registration, treatment planning, and therapy response assessment). Recommendations are provided on acceptance testing, annual and monthly quality assurance, scanning protocols to ensure consistency between interpatient scans and intrapatient longitudinal scans, reporting of patient and scan parameters in literature, requirements for incorporation of [¹⁸ F]FDG-PET in treatment planning systems, and image registration. The recommendations provided here are minimum requirements and are not meant to cover all aspects of the use of [¹⁸ F]FDG-PET for RT.