Time to tracheal intubation over a fibreoptic bronchoscope using a silicone left double-lumen endobronchial tube versus polyvinyl chloride single-lumen tube with bronchial blocker: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial

Efficacy and safety of video double-lumen tube intubation in lateral position in patients undergoing thoracic surgery: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Video double-lumen tube (VDLT) intubation in lateral position is a potential alternative to intubation in supine position in patients undergoing thoracic surgery. This non-inferiority trial assessed the efficacy and safety of VDLT intubation in lateral position.

METHODS

Patients (18-70 yr) undergoing right thoracoscopic lung surgery were randomized to either the left lateral position group (group L) or the supine position group (group S). The VDLT was placed under video larygoscopy. The primary endpoint was the intubation time. Secondary endpoints included VDLT displacement rate, intubation failure rate, the satisfaction of surgeon and nurse, and intubation-related adverse events.

RESULTS

The analysis covered 80 patients. The total intubation time was 52.0 [20.4]s in group L and 34.3 [13.2]s in group S, with a mean difference of 17.6 s [95% confidence interval (CI): 9.9 s to 25.3 s; P = 0.050], failing to demonstrate non-inferiority with a non-inferiority margin of 10 s. Group L, compared with group S, had significantly lower VDLT displacement rate (P = 0.017) and higher nurse satisfaction (P = 0.026). No intubation failure occurred in any group. Intubation complications (P = 0.802) and surgeon satisfaction (P = 0.415) were comparable between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The lateral VDLT intubation took longer time than in the supine position, and non-inferiority was not achieved. The incidence of displacement as the secondary endpoint was lower in the L group, possibly due to changing body positions beforehand. The indication of lateral VDLT intubation should be based on a balance between the safety of airway management and the lower incidence of displacement.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at Chictr.org.cn with the number ChiCTR2200064831 on 19/10/2022.

Comparison of silicone double-lumen tube and polyvinyl chloride single-lumen tube in fiberoptic tracheal intubation on a difficult airway model: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial

The management of patients with history or suspicion of difficult intubation can be challenging, especially in surgical procedures requiring one-lung ventilation. The ease of insertion of silicone double lumen tube (DLT) have previously been shown to be comparable to polyvinyl single lumen tube (SLT) in fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) tracheal intubation. Hence, in difficult airway situation, we hypothesized that the performance of insertion of silicone DLT would also be non-inferior to polyvinyl SLT in FOB intubation. We used a neck collar to mimic patients with difficult airway. 80 patients who required one-lung ventilation were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial. Patients were randomly allocated to the DLT or SLT groups (SLT with bronchial blocker). Neck collar was supplied to all patients before FOB intubation. The time of insertion for FOB, railroading, tracheal intubation, and total procedure were measured. The difficulty of railroading was evaluated in 4 grades. In the DLT group, the railroading was significantly shorter and easier comparing to the SLT group. The total procedure was also simpler and faster in the DLT group. While simulated difficult airways may not fully replicate actual difficult airways, we suggest that fiberoptic intubation with silicone DLT could be a feasible first-line option for patients with expected difficult airways requiring lung separation, unless the size of the DLT relative to the patient's airway is problematic.Trial registration: NCT03392766.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficiency and Safety of Double-Lumen Tube and Bronchial Blocker for One-Lung Ventilation

One-lung ventilation is also used in some thoracic or cardiac surgery, vascular surgery and oesophageal procedures. We conducted a search of the literature for relevant studies in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library. The final literature search was performed on 10 December 2022. Primary outcomes included the quality of lung collapse. Secondary outcome measures included: the success of the first intubation attempt, malposition rate, time for device placement, lung collapse and adverse events occurrence. Twenty-five studies with 1636 patients were included. Excellent lung collapse among DLT and BB groups was 72.4% vs. 73.4%, respectively (OR = 1.20; 95%CI: 0.84 to 1.72; p = 0.31). The malposition rate was 25.3% vs. 31.9%, respectively (OR = 0.66; 95%CI: 0.49 to 0.88; p = 0.004). The use of DLT compared to BB was associated with a higher risk of hypoxemia (13.5% vs. 6.0%, respectively; OR = 2.27; 95%CI: 1.14 to 4.49; p = 0.02), hoarseness (25.2% vs. 13.0%; OR = 2.30; 95%CI: 1.39 to 3.82; p = 0.001), sore throat (40.3% vs. 23.3%; OR = 2.30; 95%CI: 1.68 to 3.14; p < 0.001), and bronchus/carina injuries (23.2% vs. 8.4%; OR = 3.45; 95%CI: 1.43 to 8.31; p = 0.006). The studies conducted so far on comparing DLT and BB are ambiguous. In the DLT compared to the BB group, the malposition rate was statistically significantly lower, and time to tube placement and lung collapse was shorter. However, the use of DLT compared to BB can be associated with a higher risk of hypoxemia, hoarseness, sore throat and bronchus/carina injuries. Multicenter randomized trials on larger groups of patients are needed to draw definitive conclusions regarding the superiority of any of these devices.

Appropriate tube temperature for fiberoptic bronchoscope-guided intubation of thermally softened double-lumen endotracheal tubes: A CONSORT-compliant article

BACKGROUND

To compare the effects of thermal softening of double-lumen endotracheal tubes (DLT) at different temperatures during fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB)-guided intubation.

METHODS

We randomly divided 144 patients undergoing thoracic surgery into 4 groups as follows: T1 (T = 24 ± 1°C, n = 36), T2 (T = 36 ± 1°C, n = 36), T3 (T = 40 ± 1°C, n = 36), and T4 (T = 48 ± 1°C, n = 36). All groups underwent FOB-guided double-lumen endotracheal intubation and positioning. We recorded the duration of positioning and intubation using DLT, intubation resistance (IR), the success rate of the first attempt at endotracheal intubation, and the incidence of postoperative vocal cord injury and hoarseness.

RESULTS

The time to intubation was longer in the T1 group than that in the T2, T3, and T4 groups (P < .05). The time for positioning was longer in the T4 group than that in the T1, T2, and T3 groups (P < .05). IR was lower in the T3 and T4 groups than those in T1 and T2 groups (P < .05). The success rate of the first attempt at endotracheal intubation was higher in the T2, T3, and T4 groups than that in the T1 group (P < .05). Postoperative glottic injury and hoarseness were higher in the T1 and T2 groups than those in the T3 and T4 groups (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

A thermally softened DLT shortened the time to intubation, reduced the IR, improved the success rate of the first attempt at endotracheal intubation, and lowered the incidence of postoperative glottic injury and hoarseness. The optimal tube temperature for FOB-guided intubation of thermally softened DLT was 40 ± 1°C.

A comparison between bronchial blockers and double-lumen tubes for patients undergoing lung resection: A propensity score-matched cohort study

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the effect of bronchial blockers (BB) and double-lumen tubes (DLT) on patients' postoperative recovery after lung resection. Method: 4,636 patients undergoing lung resection and receiving either BB or DLT intubation were reviewed and matched using the propensity score matching method. The primary outcome was the surgical duration. The secondary outcomes included diagnostic results of postoperative chest X-ray, postoperative oxygenation index, incidence of hypercapnia, hypoxemia and sore throat, chest tube duration, incidence of ICU admission, length of hospital stay and incidence of the 30-day readmission. Results: After matching, 401 patients receiving BB were matched to 3,439 patients receiving DLT. There was no statistical difference on the surgical duration between the two groups (P>0.05). However, compared with the DLT group, patients in the BB group showed more infiltrate especially at the surgery side (14.96% versus 9.07%, P<0.001) based on the chest X-ray, together with higher incidence of ICU admission (5.23% versus 2.61%, P<0.05). Additionally, no statistical differences were found between the two groups about chest tube duration, oxygenation index, incidence of hypercapnia, hypoxemia and sore throat, duration of surgery, hospital stays and 30-day readmission (P>0.05). Conclusions: Compared with the DLT, patients receiving BB technique tend to have increased pulmonary infiltrate (especially the surgery side) and higher incidence of ICU admission at the early post-operative stage, which may have an influence on the patients' recovery.

Safety and efficacy of video DLT (VDLT) for lung isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic

One lung ventilation (OLV) with collapse of the ipsilateral lung is a prerequisite for most thoracic surgical procedures. Double-lumen tube (DLT) is still the preferred method to isolate the lungs and fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) is the gold standard for the confirmation of correct placement of the DLT. However, both these procedures are considered as a high-aerosol-generating procedures and are hazardous to the health workers, particularly at this time of the COVID-19 pandemic. We did nine thoracic surgery cases categorized as essential, requiring OLV during the ongoing period of the COVID-19 between April 2020 and May 2020 where we used Full view DLT for lung isolation. We present our case series which shows that the Full view VDLT can minimize or circumvent the use of FOB during OLV, and reduce the time taken to isolate the lungs thus reducing aerosol in the theater. None of the nine patients required FOB for confirmation of initial positioning nor for diagnosis of intraoperative malposition. The time taken to isolate the lungs was significantly less and the surgical positioning was done under real-time monitoring by visualizing the blue cuff distal to carina at all times. The real-time monitoring by the Full view VDLT offers the additional advantage of detecting any malposition even before it results in loss of isolation or desaturation. We conclude that the Full view VDLT is an efficient and safe alternative for lung isolation at this time of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Use of the Human Broncho® Double-Lumen Tube in a Tracheal Bronchus Patient After Failed Lung Isolation with a Broncho-Cath™: A Case Report

Airway management for one-lung ventilation may be challenging for anesthesiologists depending on the location of the tracheal bronchus orifice and possible anatomical distortions. Polyvinyl chloride double-lumen tube Broncho-Cath™ has been successfully used for one-lung ventilation in most cases of tracheal bronchus arising within 2 cm above the carina. However, there have been reports of occasional failure. A 78-year-old male patient diagnosed with secondary pneumothorax was scheduled for video-assisted thoracic surgery, and the tracheal bronchus originating 1.9 cm above the carina was shown in the preoperative chest computed tomography. Although a left-sided Broncho-Cath was initially placed, one-lung ventilation could not be achieved. Under bronchoscopy view through the tracheal lumen, the tracheal bronchus orifice was found to be partially obstructed. Furthermore, the bronchial cuff was herniated from the left main bronchus, leading to a failure of one-lung ventilation. The Broncho-Cath was replaced with a silicone double-lumen tube Human Broncho^®, which has more flexible bronchial segment and an increased marginal gap between the bronchial cuff and the tracheal lumen opening. The Human Broncho was successfully placed in an optimal position within the left main bronchus without blocking the tracheal bronchus orifice, thereby achieving the successful one-lung ventilation. The structurally unique Human Broncho may be considered as an alternative option in thoracic surgery of tracheal bronchus patients if lung isolation cannot be achieved with the Broncho-Cath.

Congenital Bronchobiliary Fistula: A Case Report and Literature Review

Congenital bronchobiliary fistula (CBBF) is a rare disease. Children with CBBF mostly have atypical clinical manifestations that can be easily missed. We report a case of a child with CBBF who was diagnosed with fistulography with the help of an endobronchial blocker and a fiberoptic bronchoscope. The CBBF was successfully removed by thoracoscopic surgery.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Novel Triple-Cuffed Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes with Conventional Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes for Lung Isolation

Placing a double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) in an appropriate position to facilitate lung isolation is essential for thoracic procedures. The novel ANKOR DLT is a DLT developed with three cuffs with a newly added carinal cuff designed to prevent further advancement by being blocked by the carina when the cuff is inflated. In this prospective study, the direction and depth of initial placement of ANKOR DLT were compared with those of conventional DLT. Patients undergoing thoracic surgery (n = 190) with one-lung ventilation (OLV) were randomly allocated into either left-sided conventional DLT group (n = 95) or left-sided ANKOR DLT group (n = 95). The direction and depth of DLT position were compared via fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) after endobronchial intubation between the groups. There was no significant difference in the number of right mainstem endobronchial intubations between the two groups (p = 0.468). The difference between the initial depth of DLT placement and the target depth confirmed by FOB was significantly lower in the ANKOR DLT group than in the conventional DLT group (1.8 ± 1.8 vs. 12.9 ± 9.7 mm; p < 0.001). In conclusion, the ANKOR DLT facilitated its initial positioning at the optimal depth compared to the conventional DLT.