2
|
Anastasiadis K, Antonitsis P, Murkin J, Serrick C, Gunaydin S, El-Essawi A, Bennett M, Erdoes G, Liebold A, Punjabi P, Theodoropoulos KC, Kiaii B, Wahba A, de Somer F, Bauer A, Kadner A, van Boven W, Argiriadou H, Deliopoulos A, Baker RΑ, Breitenbach I, Ince C, Starinieri P, Jenni H, Popov V, Moorjani N, Moscarelli M, Di Eusanio M, Cale A, Shapira O, Baufreton C, Condello I, Merkle F, Stehouwer M, Schmid C, Ranucci M, Angelini G, Carrel T. 2021 MiECTiS focused update on the 2016 position paper for the use of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery. Perfusion 2023; 38:1360-1383. [PMID: 35961654 DOI: 10.1177/02676591221119002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The landmark 2016 Minimal Invasive Extracorporeal Technologies International Society (MiECTiS) position paper promoted the creation of a common language between cardiac surgeons, anesthesiologists and perfusionists which led to the development of a stable framework that paved the way for the advancement of minimal invasive perfusion and related technologies. The current expert consensus document offers an update in areas for which new evidence has emerged. In the light of published literature, modular minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) has been established as a safe and effective perfusion technique that increases biocompatibility and ultimately ensures perfusion safety in all adult cardiac surgical procedures, including re-operations, aortic arch and emergency surgery. Moreover, it was recognized that incorporation of MiECC strategies advances minimal invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) by combining reduced surgical trauma with minimal physiologic derangements. Minimal Invasive Extracorporeal Technologies International Society considers MiECC as a physiologically-based multidisciplinary strategy for performing cardiac surgery that is associated with significant evidence-based clinical benefit that has accrued over the years. Widespread adoption of this technology is thus strongly advocated to obtain additional healthcare benefit while advancing patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyriakos Anastasiadis
- Cardiothoracic Department, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Polychronis Antonitsis
- Cardiothoracic Department, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - John Murkin
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Cyril Serrick
- Department of Perfusion, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Serdar Gunaydin
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ankara City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Aschraf El-Essawi
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Mark Bennett
- Department of Anesthesia, Morriston Hospital, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, UK
| | - Gabor Erdoes
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Liebold
- Department of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Prakash Punjabi
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Bob Kiaii
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Alexander Wahba
- Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, St Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway and Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Filip de Somer
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Adrian Bauer
- Department of Cardiovascular Perfusion, MediClin Heart Center, Coswig, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany
| | - Alexander Kadner
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
| | | | - Helena Argiriadou
- Cardiothoracic Department, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Apostolos Deliopoulos
- Cardiothoracic Department, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Robert Α Baker
- Cardiothoracic Surgery Quality and Outcomes, and Perfusion, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ingo Breitenbach
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Braunschweig Clinic, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Can Ince
- Department of Intensive Care, Laboratory of Translational Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Hansjoerg Jenni
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Vadim Popov
- Department of Cardio-Vascular Surgery, Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery, Moscow, Russia
| | - Narain Moorjani
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Papworth Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marco Moscarelli
- Cardiac Surgery, Anthea Hospital Gvm Care & Research, Bari, Italy
| | - Marco Di Eusanio
- Lancisi Cardiovascular Center, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Alex Cale
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - Oz Shapira
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | - Ignazio Condello
- Cardiac Surgery, Anthea Hospital Gvm Care & Research, Bari, Italy
| | - Frank Merkle
- Academy for Perfusion, German Heart Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marco Stehouwer
- Department of Clinical Perfusion, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Christof Schmid
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Marco Ranucci
- Department of Cardiovascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianni Angelini
- Bristol Heart Institute, Bristol Royal Infirmary, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Thierry Carrel
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Anastasiadis K, Antonitsis P, Asteriou C, Deliopoulos A, Argiriadou H. Modular minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation ensures perfusion safety and technical feasibility in cardiac surgery; a systematic review of the literature. Perfusion 2021; 37:852-862. [PMID: 34137323 DOI: 10.1177/02676591211026514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite extensive evidence that shows clinical of superiority of MiECC, worldwide penetration remains low due to concerns regarding air handling and volume management in the context of a closed system. The purpose of this study is to thoroughly investigate perfusion safety and technical feasibility of performing all cardiac surgical procedures with modular (hybrid) MiECC, as experienced from the perfusionist's perspective. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed perfusion charts of consecutive adult patients undergoing all types of elective, urgent, and emergency cardiac surgery under modular MiECC. The primary outcome measure was perfusion safety and technical feasibility, as evidenced in the need for conversion from a closed to an open circuit. A systematic review of the literature was conducted aiming to ultimately clarify whether there are any safety issues regarding MiECC technology. RESULTS We challenged modular MiECC use in a series of 403 consecutive patients of whom a significant proportion (111/403; 28%) underwent complex surgery including reoperations (4%), emergency repair of acute type A aortic dissection and composite aortic surgery (1.7%). Technical success rate was 100%. Conversion to an open circuit was required in 18/396 patients (4.5%), excluding procedures performed under circulatory arrest. Open configuration accounted for 40% ± 21% of total procedural perfusion time and was related to significant hemodilution and increase in peak lactate levels. Systematic review revealed that safety of the procedure challenged originated from a single report, while no clinical adverse event related to MiECC was identified. CONCLUSIONS Use of modular MiECC secures safety and ensures technical feasibility in all cardiac surgical procedures. It represents a type III active closed system, while its stand-by component is reserved for a small (<5%) proportion of procedures and for a partial procedural time. Thus, it eliminates any safety concern regarding air handling and volume management, while it overcomes any unexpected intraoperative scenario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyriakos Anastasiadis
- Cardiothoracic Department, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Polychronis Antonitsis
- Cardiothoracic Department, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Christos Asteriou
- Cardiothoracic Department, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Apostolos Deliopoulos
- Cardiothoracic Department, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Helena Argiriadou
- Cardiothoracic Department, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|