Less invasive ventricular enhancement (LIVE) as potential therapy for ischaemic cardiomyopathy end-stage heart failure

Emerging devices for heart failure management

There have been significant advances in the treatment of heart failure (HF) in recent years, driven by significant strides in guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). Despite this, HF is still associated with high levels of morbidity and mortality, and most patients do not receive optimal medical therapy. In conjunction with the improvement of GDMT, novel device therapies have been developed to better treat HF. These devices include technology capable of remotely monitoring HF physiology, devices that modulate the autonomic nervous system, and those that structurally change the heart with the ultimate aim of addressing the root causes of HF physiology As these device therapies gradually integrate into the fabric of HF patient care, it becomes increasingly important for modern cardiologists to become familiar with them. Hence, the objective of this review is to shed light on currently emerging devices for the treatment of HF.

Device Interventions for Heart Failure

Despite remarkable advances in drug therapy for heart failure (HF), the residual HF-related morbidity, mortality, and hospitalizations remain substantial across all HF phenotypes, and significant proportions of patients with HF remain symptomatic despite optimal drug therapy. Driven by these unmet clinical needs, the exponential growth of transcatheter interventions, and a recent shift in the regulatory landscape of device-based therapies, novel device-based interventions have emerged as a potential therapy for various phenotypes of HF. Device-based interventions can overcome some of the limitations of drug therapy (eg, intolerance, nonadherence, inconsistent delivery, and recurrent and long-term cost) and can target some HF-related pathophysiologic pathways more effectively than drug therapy. This paper reviews the current evolving landscape of device-based interventions in HF and highlights critical points related to implementation of these therapies in the current workflow of HF management.

Novel Device Therapies for Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) therapeutics have advanced significantly over the past few years [...].

Midterm Outcome of Hybrid Transcatheter and Minimally Invasive Left Ventricular Reconstruction for the Treatment of Ischemic Heart Failure

Background

Left ventricular (LV) remodeling after anterior myocardial infarction (AMI) can cause a pathological increase in LV volume, reduction in LV ejection fraction (EF), and symptomatic heart failure (HF). This study evaluates the midterm results of a hybrid transcatheter and minimally invasive surgical technique to reconstruct the negatively remodeled LV by myocardial scar plication and exclusion with microanchoring technology.

Methods

Retrospective single-center analysis of patients who underwent hybrid LV reconstruction (LVR) with the Revivent TransCatheter System. Patients were accepted for the procedure when they presented with symptomatic HF (New York Heart Association class ≥ II, EF < 40%) after AMI, in the presence of a dilated LV with either akinetic or dyskinetic scar in the anteroseptal wall and/or apex of ≥50% transmurality.

Results

Between October 2016 and November 2021, 30 consecutive patients were operated. Procedural success was 100%. Comparing echocardiographic data preoperatively and directly postoperatively, LVEF increased from 33 ± 8% to 44 ± 10% (p < 0.0001). LV end-systolic volume index decreased from 58 ± 24 mL/m2 to 34 ± 19 mL/m2 (p < 0.0001) and LV end-diastolic volume index decreased from 84 ± 32 mL/m2 to 58 ± 25 mL/m2 (p < 0.0001). Hospital mortality was 0%. After a mean follow-up of 3.4 ± 1.3 years, there was a significant improvement of New York Heart Association class (p = 0.001) with 76% of surviving patients in class I-II.

Conclusions

Hybrid LVR for symptomatic HF after AMI is safe and results in significant improvement in EF, reduction in LV volumes, and sustained improvement in symptoms.

State-of-the-Art Review: Technical and Imaging Considerations in Hybrid Transcatheter and Minimally Invasive Left Ventricular Reconstruction for Ischemic Heart Failure

Negative left ventricular (LV) remodeling consequent to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is characterized by an increase in LV volumes in the presence of a depressed LVEF. In order to restore the shape, size, and function of the LV, operative treatment options to achieve volume reduction and shape reconstruction should be considered. In the past decade, conventional surgical LV reconstruction through a full median sternotomy has evolved towards a hybrid transcatheter and less invasive LV reconstruction. In order to perform a safe and effective hybrid LV reconstruction, thorough knowledge of the technical considerations and adequate use of multimodality imaging both pre- and intraoperatively are fundamental. In addition, a comprehensive understanding of the individual procedural steps from both a cardiological and surgical point of view is required.

Novel devices for managing heart failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite advances in heart failure (HF) therapies, the associated morbidity, mortality, hospitalization rates, and healthcare expenditures remain high. A significant proportion of patients with HF remain symptomatic despite receiving optimal medical therapy. Consequently, there exists a large unmet clinical need for novel therapies for treating acute and chronic HF. With the exponential growth of transcatheter interventions in structural heart disease, novel applications of minimally invasive, device-based therapies have been sought in an effort to bridge this treatment gap. The rationale, development, and current data underscoring these therapies will be summarized in this review.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of devices that alter left ventricular geometry (i.e., ventriculoplasty), create anatomic shunts to decompress the left atrium, and modulate vena caval and renal blood flow. However pivotal large trials evaluating clinical outcomes are ongoing.

SUMMARY

Innovative device-based therapies may expand our armamentarium against the growing heterogeneous and morbid HF syndrome.

Device Therapy in Chronic Heart Failure: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

The regulatory landscape for device-based heart failure (HF) therapies has seen a major shift in the last 7 years. In 2013, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration released guidance for early feasibility and first-in-human studies, thereby encouraging device innovation, and in 2016 the U.S. Congress authorized the Breakthrough Devices Program to expedite access for Americans to innovative devices indicated for diagnosis and treatment of serious illnesses, such as HF. Since December 2016, there has been an increase in the number of HF devices for which manufacturers are seeking approval through the breakthrough designation pathway. This has led to a rapid uptake in the development and evaluation of device-based HF therapies. This article reviews the current and future landscape of device therapies for chronic HF and associated comorbidities and the regulatory environment that is driving current and future innovation.

Anesthetic Considerations for a Novel Method of Surgical Ventricular Remodeling Using the BioVentrix Revivent TC System

Surgical ventricular remodeling (SVR) is an invasive method of treating patients with heart failure who also have ischemic cardiomyopathy and reduced ejection fraction (EF). Introduced in the mid-1980s, this technique was met with varying success and relatively high morbidity and mortality despite its theoretical benefits. The development of the BioVentrix Revivent TC System (BioVentrix, Inc., San Ramon, CA) as a less-invasive method of surgical ventricular remodeling has created a novel, multidisciplinary approach to heart failure management, which necessitates multiple subspecialties. Currently in the trial phase in the United States and widely used in Europe, the positive results to date appear promising for the rapid adoption of this procedure. For the cardiac anesthesiologist, a thorough understanding of the patient population, procedural goals, and intraoperative management is essential. This overview discusses the advancement in surgical ventricular remodeling, the pertinent surgical steps of the BioVentrix Revivent TC System placement, and specific anesthetic considerations for this novel procedure.

Hybrid transcatheter left ventricular reconstruction for the treatment of ischemic cardiomyopathy

Left ventricular (LV) enlargement is a mechanical adaptation to accommodate LV systolic inefficiency following an acute damage or a progressive functional deterioration, which fails to correct the decline of stroke volume in the long term, leading to progressive heart failure (HF). Surgical ventricular reconstruction (SVR) is a treatment for patients with severe ischemic HF aiming to restore LV efficiency by volume reduction and LV re-shaping. Recently, a new minimally-invasive hybrid technique for ventricular reconstruction has been developed by means of the Revivent™ system (BioVentrix Inc., San Ramon, CA, USA). The device for ventricular reconstruction consists of anchor pairs that enable plication of the anterior and free wall LV scar against the right ventricular (RV) septal scar of anteroseptal infarctions to decrease cardiac volume without ventriculotomy in a beating-heart minimally-invasive procedure, consisting of a transjugular and left thoracotomy approach. Patients with severe (Grade 4) functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) or with previous cardiac surgery procedures were excluded. Outcome of the reconstruction procedure: from 2012 until 2019, it has been applied to 203 patients, with 5 (2.5%) in-hospital deaths. LV volume reduction varied according to experience gained along years: LV end-systolic volume index decreased from baseline 43% (post-market registry) vs. 27% (CE-mark study); left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased from baseline 25% (post-market registry) vs. 16% (CE-mark study). Clinical status (NYHA class, HF questionnaire, 6-minute walking test) improved significantly compared to baseline, and re-hospitalization rate was only 13% at 6-month follow-up (60% of patients in NYHA =3). FMR grade decreased at follow-up in 63%, while it was unchanged in 37% of patients. The hybrid ventricular reconstruction (HVR) seems a promising treatment for HF patients who may benefit from LV volume reduction, with reasonable mortality and good results at follow-up. A baseline less severe clinical profile was not associated to better outcome at follow-up, which makes the procedure feasible in patients with very large ventricles and depressed ejection fraction (EF). LV reshaping has no detrimental effect on FMR, that may, on the contrary, benefit owing to less papillary muscle displacement, partial recovery of torsion dynamics and of myofibers re-orientation. A controlled study on top of optimal medical treatment is warranted to confirm its role in the management of HF patients.