Defining the role of adjuvant radiotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma: a propensity-matched landmark analysis of the National Cancer Database

Safety and efficacy of helical tomotherapy following lung-sparing surgery in locally advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma

PURPOSE

To assess the value of radiation therapy (RT) with helical tomotherapy (HT) in the management of locally advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) receiving no or lung-sparing surgery.

METHODS

Consecutive MPM cases not undergoing extrapleural pneumonectomy and receiving intensity-modulated (IM) HT were retrospectively evaluated for local control, distant control, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Impact of age, systemic treatment, RT dose, and recurrence patterns was analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. As a secondary endpoint, reported toxicity was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 34 localized MPM cases undergoing IMHT were identified, of which follow-up data were available for 31 patients. Grade 3 side effects were experienced by 26.7% of patients and there were no grade 4 or 5 events observed. Median PFS was 19 months. Median OS was 20 months and the rates for 1‑ and 2‑year OS were 86.2 and 41.4%, respectively. OS was significantly superior for patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

IMHT of locally advanced MPM after lung-sparing surgery is safe and feasible, resulting in satisfactory local control and survival. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improves OS. Randomized clinical trials incorporating modern RT techniques as a component of trimodal treatment are warranted to establish an evidence-based standard of care pattern for locally advanced MPM.

A population-based evaluation of tunica vaginalis mesothelioma: An analysis of the National Cancer Database

PURPOSE

Primary mesothelioma of the tunica vaginalis (TVM) is a rare and poorly understood malignancy with insufficient population-level data to guide management decisions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of TVM cases recorded in the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2015 was performed. Cases were identified using International Classification of Diseases for Oncology histology codes. Associations between demographic, clinical and therapeutic factors were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for overall survival (OS) and Cox proportional hazard modeling. Propensity score matching for receipt of systemic chemotherapy was performed to assess the impact on OS.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-one men with a median age of 65 years (interquartile range [IQR] 51-78) were included. Median OS from diagnosis was 72.5 months (IQR 20.2-Not Reached [NR]) after a median follow up of 34.9 months. Multivariate analysis demonstrated an increased risk of death for patients in the fourth quartile of age (hazard ratio [HR] 5.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.70-18.17, P = 0.004), those with biphasic or fibrous histology (HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.15-6.42, P = 0.04) and positive surgical margins (HR 3.27, 95% CI 1.61-6.63, P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in OS associated with receiving chemotherapy (P = 0.5) even after propensity score matching (P = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Margin-negative surgical resection is paramount to improving OS. There are insufficient data to recommend for or against adjuvant systemic chemotherapy or RT, although the limited available data does not suggest apparent benefit in terms of OS.

GOECP/SEOR clinical guidelines on radiotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare tumor with poor prognosis and rising incidence. Palliative care is common in MPM as radical treatment with curative intent is often not possible due to metastasis or extensive locoregional involvement. Numerous therapeutic advances have been made in recent years, including the use of less aggressive surgical techniques associated with lower morbidity and mortality (e.g., pleurectomy/decortication), technological advancements in the field of radiotherapy (intensity-modulated radiotherapy, image-guided radiotherapy, stereotactic body radiotherapy, proton therapy), and developments in systemic therapies (chemotherapy and immunotherapy). These improvements have had as yet only a modest effect on local control and survival. Advances in the management of MPM and standardization of care are hampered by the evidence to date, limited by high heterogeneity among studies and small sample sizes. In this clinical guideline prepared by the oncological group for the study of lung cancer of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology, we review clinical, histologic, and therapeutic aspects of MPM, with a particular focus on all aspects relating to radiotherapy, including the current evidence base, associations with chemotherapy and surgery, treatment volumes and planning, technological advances, and reradiation.

Controversies in the role of radiotherapy in pleural mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an uncommon thoracic cancer with a relatively poor outcome, which has only seen modest improvements when compared to non-small cell lung cancer. The mainstays of treatment have been surgery and systemic therapy, with radiation reserved for palliation or as an adjunct. However, there is re-emergent interest in the use of radiotherapy in the treatment of mesothelioma, given recent technical advances in radiotherapy delivery which permit increased treatment accuracy. This overview article reviews the radiobiology of the mesothelioma and whether or not mesothelioma is an inherently radioresistant cancer and the potential impact that hypofractionation may have on different histological subtypes in mesothelioma. This overview also considers the role of radiation in palliation, as adjunct to surgical resection and as adjunct to pleural tract procedures. In particular we review the growing evidence that pleural tract or port site adjuvant radiotherapy provides no clinical benefit. This overview will also consider potential emerging therapeutic strategies such as pre-operative short course hypofractionated radiotherapy. The role of novel radiotherapy techniques such as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy, image guided radiotherapy, proton therapy and the potential role of radiotherapy as an immune stimulating agent in combination of immunotherapy, will also be discussed. Finally, given the many unanswered questions, this review discusses some of the emerging and ongoing clinical trials of radiotherapy in the treatment of mesothelioma.

Radiation Therapy for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

The treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma with radiation therapy has always been a technical challenge. For many years, radiation therapy was delivered after extrapleural pneumonectomy with acceptable results. As the utilization of pleurectomy/decortication increased, techniques, such as pleural intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) have been introduced. The experience with these techniques have grown and multiple trials using IMRT, both in the setting of extrapleural pneumonectomy or pleurectomy, are being conducted to assess its effectiveness.

Addition of radiotherapy to surgery and chemotherapy improves survival in localized malignant pleural mesothelioma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) study

INTRODUCTION

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a devastating disease with poor survival outcomes for most patients. Optimizing therapeutic approaches is thus vital, but has been hampered by a dearth of randomized trials to guide decision making. We used a population-level database to evaluate the impact of radiotherapy as a component of trimodality therapy on overall survival (OS) in MPM.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the SEER Radiation/Chemotherapy database for patients with MPM who received surgery and chemotherapy, with or without radiotherapy. A propensity score-matched analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed. Weight-adjusted univariate KM analysis was performed and doubly robust, IPTW-adjusted multivariable cox proportional hazards regression modeling was also performed to quantify the effect of radiotherapy on OS in trimodality therapy for MPM.

RESULTS

1015 patients were identified. 678 patients received surgery and chemotherapy, and 337 patients received trimodality therapy. For patients with localized disease, OS was significantly improved with trimodality therapy (HR 0.56, CI 0.4 - 0.8, p = 0.001), which persisted with IPTW adjustment (HR 0.65, CI 0.49 - 0.95, p = 0.0248). No significant benefit was seen for patients with regional or distant disease. On multivariate analysis, positive predictors of survival after IPTW adjustment were female sex, diagnosis after 2005, and left-sided disease.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support a significant benefit to OS by incorporating radiotherapy as a component of trimodality therapy for patients with localized MPM compared to only surgery and chemotherapy. It does not provide a significant overall survival benefit for patients with regional or metastatic disease.

Immortal Time Bias in National Cancer Database Studies

PURPOSE

In studies evaluating the benefit of adjuvant therapies, immortal time bias (ITB) can affect the results by incorrectly reporting a survival advantage. It does so by including all deceased patients who may have been planned to receive adjuvant therapy within the observation cohort. Given the increase in National Cancer Database (NCDB) analyses evaluating postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) as an adjuvant therapy, we sought to examine how often such studies accounted and adjusted for ITB.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A systematic review was undertaken to search MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 2014 until May 2019 for NCDB studies evaluating PORT. After appropriate exclusion criteria were applied, 60 peer-reviewed manuscripts in which PORT was compared with postoperative observation or maintenance therapy were reviewed. The manuscripts were reviewed to evaluate whether ITB was accounted for, the method with which it was adjusted for, impact factor, year of publication, and whether PORT was beneficial.

RESULTS

Of the 60 publications reviewed, 23 studies (38.3%) did not include an adjustment for ITB. Most studies that did adjust for ITB employed a single landmark (LM) time (n = 31), 4 used a sequential landmark analyses, and 2 used a time-dependent Cox model. In 23 of 31 studies (74.2%) that did adjust for ITB via a single LM time, the rationale behind why the specified LM time was chosen was not clearly explained. There was no relationship between adjusting for ITB and year of publication (P = .074) or whether the study was published in a high-impact journal (P = .55).

CONCLUSIONS

Studies assessing adjuvant radiation therapy by analyzing the NCDB are susceptible to ITB, which overestimates the effect size of adjuvant therapies and can provide misleading results. Adjusting for this bias is essential for accurate data representation and to better quantify the impact of adjuvant therapies such as PORT.