Completeness of training in thoracic surgery: the perfect operative log book

A successful shift from thoracotomy to video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer in a low-volume center

OBJECTIVES

Although video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy has become the gold standard for pulmonary resections of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), lobectomy is still performed via thoracotomy in many European and North American centres. VATS lobectomy was implemented overnight from thoracotomy in our low-volume centre in early 2019, after 1 senior surgeon undertook observership VATS-training overseas, and immediately became the mainstay of surgical treatment for NSCLC in Iceland. We aimed to investigate our short-term outcomes of VATS lobectomy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study on all pulmonary resections for NSCLC in Iceland 2019-2022, especially focusing on VATS lobectomies, all at cTNM stage I or II. Data were retrieved from hospital charts, including information on perioperative complications, mortality, length of stay and operation time.

RESULTS

Out of 204 pulmonary resections, mostly performed by a single senior cardiothoracic surgeon, 169 were lobectomies (82.9%) with 147 out of 169 (87.0%) being VATS lobectomies. Anterolateral thoracotomy was used in 34 cases (16.7%), including 22 lobectomies (64.7%), and 5 (3.4%) conversions from VATS lobectomy. The median postoperative stay for VATS lobectomy was 4 days and the average operating time decreased from 155 to 124 min between the first and last year of the study (P < 0.001). The rate of major and minor complications was 2.7% and 15.6% respectively. One year survival was 95.6% and all patients survived 30 days postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of VATS lobectomy has been successful in our small geographically isolated centre, serving a population of 390 000. Although technically challenging, VATS lobectomy was implemented fast for most NSCLC cases, with short-term outcomes that are comparable to larger high-volume centres.

Training residents in robotic thoracic surgery

With growing integration of robotic technology in thoracic surgery, the need for structured training has never been greater with trainees expressing desire for additional experience. Determining the ideal education program is challenging as the collective experience is still relatively early and growing with many experienced surgeons still becoming facile with the platform. Understanding differences between robotic and thoracoscopic approaches including lung retraction and dissection, use of carbon dioxide insufflation, and lack of tactile feedback serves as the foundation for building a skillset. Currently, there is no standard accepted curriculum for residents. Inclusion of these trainees in structured programs has been shown to be safe with equivalent patient outcomes. There are multiple curricula under development, all of which incorporate use of simulation technology, dual console, and clear, graduated responsibilities within operations. These include introduction to the robotic system prior to progressing to bedside assistance and finally to time as console surgeon. The importance of clear definition of training milestones with deliberate graduation to more complex tasks once competency has been demonstrated cannot be overstated. It is crucial for surgeons practicing robotic surgery to make efforts to further the training of residents, but there has not been any perfect and suitable program identified yet.