Thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy and two-field lymph node dissection

Right gastroepiploic artery length determined anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

This prospective cohort study, conducted at a high-volume esophageal cancer center from July 2019 to July 2022, aimed to investigate the link between the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) length and anastomotic leakage (AL) rates following minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Real-world data on stomach blood supply in the Chinese population were examined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 516 cases were enrolled, categorized into two groups based on the Youden index-determined optimal cut-off value for the relative length of RGEA (length of RGEA/length of gastric conduit, 64.69%) through ROC analysis: Group SR (short RGEA) and Group LR (long RGEA). The primary observation parameter was the relationship between AL incidence and the ratio of direct blood supply from RGEA. Secondary parameters included the mean length of the right gastroepiploic artery, greater curvature, and the connection type between right and left gastroepiploic vessels. Patient data were prospectively recorded in electronic case report forms.

RESULTS

The study revealed median lengths of 43.60 cm for greater curvature, 43.16 cm for the gastric conduit, and 26.75 cm for RGEA. AL, the most common postoperative complication, showed a significant difference between groups (16.88 vs. 8.84%, P =0.01). Multivariable binary logistic regression identified Group SR and LR (odds ratio: 2.651, 95% CI: 1.124-6.250, P =0.03) and Neoadjuvant therapy (odds ratio: 2.479, 95% CI: 1.374-4.473, P =0.00) as independent predictors of AL.

CONCLUSIONS

The study emphasizes the crucial role of RGEA length in determining AL incidence in MIE for esophageal cancer. Preserving RGEA and fostering capillary arches between RGEA and LGEA are recommended strategies to mitigate AL risk.

Solitary Celiac Lymph Node Metastasis Has a Better Long-Term Survival Compared With Solitary Mediastinal Lymph Node Metastasis in Esophagectomy of Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Background

The prognostic benefit of extensive lymphadenectomy remains controversial in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the potential effect of solitary mediastinal (SM) lymph node metastasis and solitary celiac (SC) lymph node metastasis on the short- and long-term outcomes for patients who underwent minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy.

Methods

From September 2009 to December 2020, a total of 934 cases were diagnosed with ESCC and underwent minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy in our department; 223 cases met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to contrast the postoperative results and long-term survival of Group 1 (SM) and Group 2 (SC). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used on possible predictors of survival.

Results

One hundred forty-seven patients were available for outcome comparison after PSM. The postoperative results were not significantly different between the two groups. In terms of long-term survival, the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 37.6% and 57.3% (p = 0.191) and 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was 39.7% and 68.4% (p = 0.028) for Group 1 (SM) and Group 2 (SC), respectively. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses showed that body mass index (BMI), pathologic stage (pStage), and SC/SM grouping had significant hazard ratios (HRs), which suggested that SC is associated with better DSS.

Conclusion

This cohort study showed that SC lymph node metastasis has a better long-term survival compared with SM lymph node metastasis in esophagectomy of ESCC. The results challenge the current understanding and need confirmation in further research.

Safety comparison of minimally invasive abdomen-only esophagectomy versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

We report mortality and post-operative complications from esophageal resection in the treatment of gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma or stricture, comparing a minimally invasive abdomen-only esophagectomy (MIAE) approach with a minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MIILE) approach.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma or stricture treated by either MIAE or MIILE was conducted. MIAE was offered for strictures less than five centimeters or cancers that were American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage ≤ T2 without lymphadenopathy. Patients treated with these surgical techniques were analyzed to assess pre-operative risk, intra and post-operative variables, adverse events, and overall survival.

RESULTS

This study included 17 patients undergoing MIAE and 32 patients treated with MIILE. There were a fewer median number of lymph nodes resected (p < 0.001) and shorter operative duration (p < 0.001) for MIAE compared to MIILE. MIAE patients also had significantly higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores and ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) surgical risk values than MIILE patients (p < 0.05). There was no difference in median estimated blood loss, length of stay, pulmonary or cardiac complications between groups. There was no significant difference in 90-day survival.

CONCLUSION

A minimally invasive abdomen-only approach in a specific patient population is comparable in safety to a minimally invasive Ivor Lewis approach, with associated shorter median operative duration. MIAE patients had significantly greater pre-operative comorbidities and higher calculated peri-operative risk of complication but demonstrated similar post-operative outcomes. This suggests that MIAE may be a suitable surgical approach for treating gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma or stricture in patients deemed unsuitable for MIILE.