Prolonged air leak after pulmonary lobectomy

A successful shift from thoracotomy to video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer in a low-volume center

OBJECTIVES

Although video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy has become the gold standard for pulmonary resections of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), lobectomy is still performed via thoracotomy in many European and North American centres. VATS lobectomy was implemented overnight from thoracotomy in our low-volume centre in early 2019, after 1 senior surgeon undertook observership VATS-training overseas, and immediately became the mainstay of surgical treatment for NSCLC in Iceland. We aimed to investigate our short-term outcomes of VATS lobectomy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study on all pulmonary resections for NSCLC in Iceland 2019-2022, especially focusing on VATS lobectomies, all at cTNM stage I or II. Data were retrieved from hospital charts, including information on perioperative complications, mortality, length of stay and operation time.

RESULTS

Out of 204 pulmonary resections, mostly performed by a single senior cardiothoracic surgeon, 169 were lobectomies (82.9%) with 147 out of 169 (87.0%) being VATS lobectomies. Anterolateral thoracotomy was used in 34 cases (16.7%), including 22 lobectomies (64.7%), and 5 (3.4%) conversions from VATS lobectomy. The median postoperative stay for VATS lobectomy was 4 days and the average operating time decreased from 155 to 124 min between the first and last year of the study (P < 0.001). The rate of major and minor complications was 2.7% and 15.6% respectively. One year survival was 95.6% and all patients survived 30 days postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of VATS lobectomy has been successful in our small geographically isolated centre, serving a population of 390 000. Although technically challenging, VATS lobectomy was implemented fast for most NSCLC cases, with short-term outcomes that are comparable to larger high-volume centres.

Perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: A propensity score matched analysis

BACKGROUND

The existing literature on perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung lobectomy is inconclusive.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of VATS and RATS lobectomy procedures for patients with non-small cell lung cancer to compare the short-term perioperative outcomes by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 418 patients were enrolled in this study. After PSM, 71 patients each received VATS and RATS lobectomy for further analysis. RATS lobectomy was associated with a lower rate of conversion to thoracotomy (0% vs. 5.63%, p = 0.006), a lower rate of postoperative prolonged air leak (1.14% vs. 19.72%, p = 0.001) and a shorter duration of postoperative chest tube drainage (3 days interquartile range [IQR: 3, 4] vs. 4 days IQR [3-5], p = 0.027). Subgroup analysis indicated that after acquiring proficiency in the RATS procedure, its disadvantages diminished while its advantages were enhanced. In terms of rate of conversion to thoracotomy, length of hospital stays, and duration of postoperative chest tube drainage, RATS was comparable to uniportal VATS and superior to triportal VATS.

CONCLUSION

RATS has advantages over VATS in terms of early chest tube removal, early discharge, lower thoracotomy rate, less postoperative air leak, and a potential trend of more lymph node dissection numbers. These advantages are more pronounced after acquiring proficiency in RATS.