Surgical outcomes of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer: a single-center experience

Analysis of survival benefit from primary tumor resection and individualized prediction of overall survival for lung cancer patients with bone metastasis: Worth it or not?

BACKGROUND

The clinical management of lung cancer (LC) patients with bone metastasis (BM) is still a significant challenge. This study aimed to explore the role of primary tumor resection (PTR) on survival outcome of LC patients with BM and to develop two web-based nomograms for predicting the overall survival (OS) of LC patients with BM who received PTR and those who did not.

METHODS

We enrolled LC patients with BM from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2015. Propensity score matching (PSM) was then conducted to balance the baseline characteristics of covariates between patients in surgery and non-surgery groups. Next, Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test was performed to evaluate the survival benefit of PTR before and after PSM methods and to explore the impact of surgical resection extent on the prognosis of LC patients with BM and clinical outcomes in patients with different metastatic patterns. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was then applied to determine the independent prognostic factors for OS of patients receiving PTR and did not receiving PTR, respectively. Subsequently, we constructed two individualized nomograms for predicting the 12-, 18- and 24-months OS. Finally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were generated to evaluate discrimination, accuracy and clinical utility of the nomograms.

RESULTS

A total of 7747 eligible patients were included in this analysis. The survival analysis revealed that PTR was closely associated with better survival outcome among LC patients with BM(P < 0.05), while the survival benefit of PTR was suboptimal in patients presented with multiple metastases(P > 0.05). Besides, lobectomy shows best survival benefit. Two nomograms were then constructed based on independent prognostic factors of patients in the surgery group and the non-surgery group. The ROC curves showed good discrimination of the two nomograms, with the area under curve (AUC) of each time point being higher than 0.7 in both the training set and testing set. The calibration curves also demonstrated satisfactory consistency between actual survival and nomogram-predicted OS of both nomograms. The DCA showed high benefit of nomogram in a clinical context. Moreover, the study population was stratified into three groups based on the scores of the nomogram, and the survival analysis showed that this prognostic stratification was statistically significant (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that surgical resection of the primary site strategy can prolong survival of LC patients with BM to some extent, depending on different sites of metastasis and highly selected patients. Furthermore, the web-based nomograms showed significant accuracy in predicting OS for patients with or without surgery, which may provide valuable insights for patients' counseling and individualized decision-making for clinicians.

Long-term Surgical Outcomes in Oligometastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Center Study

Background

We reviewed the clinical outcomes of patients with oligometastatic (OM) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received multimodal therapy including lung surgery.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 117 patients with OM NSCLC who underwent complete resection of the primary tumor from 2014 to 2017.

Results

The median follow-up duration was 2.91 years (95% confidence interval, 1.48-5.84 years). The patients included 73 men (62.4%), and 76 patients (64.9%) were under the age of 65 years. Based on histology, 97 adenocarcinomas and 14 squamous cell carcinomas were included. Biomarker analysis revealed that 53 patients tested positive for epidermal growth factor receptor, anaplastic lymphoma kinase, or ROS1 mutations, while 36 patients tested negative. Metastases were detected in the brain in 74 patients, the adrenal glands in 12 patients, bone in 5 patients, vertebrae in 4 patients, and other locations in 12 patients. Radiation therapy for organ metastasis was performed in 81 patients and surgical resection in 27 patients. The 1-year overall survival (OS) rate in these patients was 82.8%, and the 3- and 5-year OS rates were 52.6% and 37.2%, respectively. Patients with positive biomarker test results had 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates of 98%, 64%, and 42.7%, respectively. These patients had better OS than those with negative biomarker test results (p=0.031). Patients aged ≤65 years and those with pT1-2 cancers also showed better survival (both p=0.008).

Conclusion

Surgical resection of primary lung cancer is a viable treatment option for selected patients with OM NSCLC in the context of multimodal therapy.

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents with or without chemotherapy versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world retrospective cohort study

Background

The aim of this study was to assessment the efficacy and safety of Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/Programmed cell death-Ligand protein 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents with or without chemotherapy versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods

In this study, pre-treatment clinical and laboratory indicators from 73 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer were retrieved for retrospective analysis. According to the therapy regimes they received, the patients were separated into groups, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy group (PC group), PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents' group (PA group), PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents plus chemotherapy group (PAC group). Cox's proportional hazards regression model and Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were used to assess the connection between treatment regimens and progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In addition, the association of treatment regimens with the risk of disease progression and death was evaluated by subgroup analysis.

Results

The average age of the enrolled patients was 58.2 ± 10.2 years and 75.3% were male. Multivariate analyses showed that patients in PA group (Disease progression: HR 0.4, P=0.005. Death: HR 0.4, P=0.024) and PAC group (Disease progression: HR 0.3, P=0.012. Death: HR 0.3, P=0.045) had a statistically significant lower hazard ratio (HR) for disease progression and death compared to patients in PC group. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients in PA group (mPFS:7.5 vs.3.5, P=0.00052. mOS:33.1 vs.21.8, P=0.093) and PAC group (mPFS:5.1 vs.3.5, P=0.075. mOS:37.3 vs.21.8, P=0.14) had a longer PFS and OS compared to patients in PC group. In all the pre-defined subgroups, patients in PA and PAC groups showed a decreasing trend in the risk of disease progression and death in most subgroups. The patients in PA group (DCR:96.3% vs.58.3%, P=0.001) and PAC group (DCR:100% vs.58.3%, P=0.019) had a better disease control rate (DCR) than patients in PC group.

Conclusion

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents with or without chemotherapy were superior to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as second or later-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis is associated with adverse outcomes after lung resection

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary fibrosis is a risk factor for the development of lung cancer. However, the low incidence of the pathology means that it is not well represented in thoracic surgery risk scoring systems. We aimed to assess whether short and long-term outcomes after lung resection for primary lung cancer were worse in patients with pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis.

METHODS

A total of 5029 consecutive patients undergoing lung resection for primary lung cancer between 2012 and 2018 in two UK centres were included. Primary outcomes were 90-day & 1-year mortality, post-operative complications and overall survival. Univariable analyses were used to compare outcomes between patients with and without pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis.

RESULTS

In total, 0.7% (n = 33) of patients had a pre-existing diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis (idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis 48.5%, non-specific interstitial pneumonia 6.1%, unknown 45.5%). Overall, 90-day and 1-year mortality were all significantly higher amongst patients with fibrosis (90-day: 18.2% vs 3.6%, p < 0.001; 1-year: 36.4% vs 10.7%, p < 0.001). The rate of reintubation was significantly higher for patients with fibrosis (9.1% vs 2.9%, p = 0.038) yet there was no difference in post-operative length of stay between groups (fibrosis: 6 days [IQR 4-9 days] vs non-fibrosis: 5 days [IQR 4-8 days], p = 0.675). Overall survival was also significantly reduced for patients with pulmonary fibrosis (log-rank analysis, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite its small size, this study suggests that short and long-term outcomes after lung resection are worse for patients with pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis. Segmental resections could be considered in these patients where oncologically appropriate to minimise peri-operative risk.

Individualized Treatment for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Case Report and Literature Review

The incidence of lung cancer is high and about 75% of the patients with lung cancer are found in the middle and advanced stage, which has a limited treatment strategy. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for about 85% of all lung cancers. In this article, we delineate the treatment process of a middle-aged male patient with advanced-stage lung cancer to explain the significance of individualized chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy and surgery. This patient has extensive bone metastasis with PS scores of 2. After nine cycles of preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and two cycles of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, the patient achieved complete response (CR) and his PS score was 0. Although there is a standard chemotherapy regimen for lung adenocarcinoma, the treatment effect varies because of individual differences. Comprehensive analysis of the characteristics of patients through a variety of means to develop a precise individualized chemotherapy plan will be a major direction of lung cancer treatment in the future. Additionally, surgical treatment for advanced lung cancer patients after chemotherapy can effectively reduce the primary lesion and prolong the survival time of patients.

Evaluation of local aggressive lung therapy versus systemic therapy in oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Previous studies have shown the feasibility and effectiveness of local aggressive thoracic therapy (surgery and radiotherapy) for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer compared with systemic therapy, but with small sample. This study aims to perform a pooled analysis to explore whether LT could improve outcomes of oligometastatic patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods

Protocol of present study was registered on PROSPERO as number: CRD42021233095. PubMed, Embase and Web of knowledge were searched, and eligible studies investigating local therapy for non-small cell lung cancer with 1-5 metastases regardless of organs were included. Linear regression between survival and clinical characteristics were conducted. Hazard ratios of survival and adverse effects were merged. Pooled survival curves were carried out.

Results

Three randomized controlled trials and 5 cohort studies enrolling 499 patients were included. There was a trend that median overall survival declined with the increasing proportion of N2-3 positive patients in local therapy group, but with no statistical difference (P=0.09, R²=0.98). Undergoing local therapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer achieved reduction of 47% and 60% in the risk of death and cancer progression (P<0.001), respectively. In subgroup analysis, patients receiving local therapy including surgery showed hazard ratio of 0.33 on progression-free survival and 0.55 of these excluding surgery. Patients receiving consolidative local therapy (local therapy after systemic therapy) obtained hazard ratios 0.33 and 0.45 on progression-free and overall survival vs. systemic therapy, respectively. Hazard ratios of those receiving upfront local therapy (local therapy first) were 0.62 and 0.68 on progression-free and overall survival vs. systemic therapy. Pooled survival analysis showed median overall and progression-free survival of local therapy (21.6 and 14 months) group were both longer than systemic one (14.3 and 6.5 months). Odds ratio of adverse effects were no difference between 2 groups (P=0.16).

Conclusions

Local aggressive thoracic therapy could prolong 7 months overall and progression-free survival compared with systemic therapy in patients with oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Consolidative local therapy might be a more favorable choice of local therapy. Benefits of local therapy for N2-3 positive patients should explored further.

Long-Term Survival After Salvage Thoracic Surgery on a Patient with ALK-Rearranged Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma After Progression on Targeted Therapy

Targeted therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is often challenged by the arising of drug resistance. After progression to targeted therapy, treatment options include continued targeted therapy, definitive local therapy, and the combination of both. While there is evidence that local ablative radiotherapy may prolong the disease control by targeted therapy, little is known regarding the relevance of salvage thoracic surgery in this setting. Herein, we presented a case of stage IV lung adenocarcinoma with concurrent EML4-ALK and TAC1-ALK fusion who had long-term survival after salvage thoracic surgery. The patient underwent a multidisciplinary treatment scheme that consisted of radiotherapy, ALK inhibitor crizotinib, and surgery, with blood-based genomic profiling for monitoring disease progression. Notably, salvage thoracic surgery was performed after progression on the crizotinib therapy and acquired ALK F1174C mutation was identified, which has been shown to be resistant to crizotinib and possibly sensitive to ceritinib. The patient benefited from salvage thoracic surgery with a remarkable progression-free survival of 31 months at last follow-up, and the patient maintained high-performance status throughout the course of management. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case reporting on the long-term survival outcome from salvage thoracic surgery after crizotinib treatment in an NSCLC patient carrying double ALK fusion.

Clinical prognostic factors in surgically treated oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review

Background

Since the concept of oligometastatic (OM) disease was introduced in the oncological scenario of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), these patients progressively became a new category of stage IV NSCLC in whom the multimodality approach, including surgery, may improve prognosis. This systematic review aimed to investigate the clinical prognostic factors in OM-NSCLC surgically treated with radical intent.

Methods

This systematic review is reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Cochrane’s Collaboration Tool was used to determine the risk of bias for the included studies’ primary outcome. A search strategy using a combination of free-text words, relevant MeSH headings and appropriate restrictions (time limit: from January 1997 to March 2020, language: English) was designed. Potentially qualified papers were subjected to an in-depth full-text examination after preliminary title/abstract screening to identify studies for inclusion in the systematic review. Data extracted included: study characteristics, baseline patient characteristics, primary and secondary outcomes. The Cochrane’s Collaboration Tool was used to determine the risk of bias for included studies’ primary outcome. The risk of bias due to incomplete outcome data was evaluated at an outcome level. However, at the study stage, the possibility of bias due to sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, selective reporting, or funding was assessed. Two independent observers calculated the probability of bias, and differences were resolved through dialogue and consensus.

Results

Nine studies were selected. Overall survival (OS) was 51.8 months and varied from 21.1 to 60 months, but results were not statistically significant. Positive prognostic factors for survival were cessation of smoking, age <60, a histologic grade of G1/G2, pN0. The presence of extra-brain OM and multiple metastases negatively affected survival.

Discussion

For otherwise stable patients with a single organ site with synchronous (or metachronous) extrathoracic M1 disease and no intrathoracic lymph node involvement, aggressive treatment should be used in the absence of randomized evidence to help determine the effective management of OM-NSCLC.

How to handle oligometastatic disease in nonsmall cell lung cancer

Patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer and limited metastatic disease have been defined as oligometastatic if local ablative therapy of all lesions is amenable. Evidence from different clinical retrospective series suggests that this subgroup harbours better prognosis than other stage IV patients. However, most reports have included patients with inconsistent numbers of metastases in different locations treated by a variety of invasive and noninvasive therapies. As long as further results from randomised clinical trials are awaited, treatment decision follows an interdisciplinary debate in each individual case. Surgery and radiotherapy should capture a dominant role in the treatment course offering the option of a curative-intended local therapy in combination with a systemic therapy based on an interdisciplinary decision. This review summarises the current treatment standard in oligometastatic lung cancer with focus on an ablative therapy for both lung primary and distant metastases in prognostically favourable locations.

Treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, and healthcare resource use associated with advanced/metastatic lung cancer in China: protocol for a retrospective observational study

Background

Lung cancer (LC) is the most common cancer worldwide. The prevalence of LC and rate of associated mortality are high and increasing faster in China than in Western countries. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for most LCs. This study aims to be the first large, multi-center, non-interventional retrospective study of treatment patterns (type/duration, number of lines, completion rate), real-world outcomes, and medical costs among Chinese patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC (IIIb/IV) or extensive-stage small cell LC (ES-SCLC).

Methods

This study will enroll 8,800 patients (≥18 years, with a diagnosis of advanced/metastatic NSCLC made between 1 December 2013 to 30 November 2014) from 35 to 50 Chinese sites. Hospital information systems (HIS) and electronic medical records will be retrospectively reviewed, in adherence with regulatory and ethical requirements. Early-stage treatment (starting from 1 December 2010) of patients with recurrent disease or early disease progression will be examined. Data will be collected at baseline (diagnosis) and 6 and 12 months after this. Observation will end after 3 years or death. Data will be stratified by histology, staging, age, region, health insurance, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutation status. Treatment duration and overall survival will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Descriptive statistics will be used for disease characteristics and patient demographics. Cox-proportional hazards models will be used to examine the impact of demographics/treatment on survival. Treatment patterns and outcome predictors will be explored using multivariate logistic regression.

Discussion

This protocol describes the methodology for collecting real-world data to guide evidence-based clinical practice and inform unmet needs in NSCLC treatment, with potential to identify gaps between guidelines and current practice.

Trial registration

NCT03505515; data registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: 12h Apr., 2018.

Research on the effect of health care integration on patients’ negative emotions and satisfaction with lung cancer nursing activities

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is a clinical disease with multiple malignant tumors. Currently, it is difficult for patients to benefit from routine clinical nursing due to the lack of a pertinent and systematic approach.

AIM

To investigate the effect of integrated nursing care on the negative emotions and satisfaction of lung cancer patients.

METHODS

From January 2018 to December 2019, 92 patients with lung cancer were selected and divided into the study group and the control group; there were 46 patients in each group. The control group received routine nursing, and the study group received integrated medical care in addition to the care received by the control group. Negative emotions before and after the intervention, the self-management ability score after the intervention, family care burden after the intervention and nursing satisfaction after the intervention were measured in the two groups.

RESULTS

After the intervention, the self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale scores in the study group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05); the scores for health knowledge, self-concept, self-responsibility and self-care skills in the study group were higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05); the scores for individual burden and responsibility burden in the study group were lower than those before the intervention (P < 0.05); and the nursing satisfaction in the study group (93.48%) was higher than that in the control group (78.26%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

An integrated nursing care approach for lung cancer patients can effectively relieve the patient’s negative feelings, improve their self-management ability, help to reduce the burden of family care and improve patient satisfaction with nursing activities.