An antibiotic loaded ceramic sternum to treat destroyed infected sternum: 4 cases

Complex chest wall reconstruction after failure: a literature review

Background and Objective

Primary and secondary chest wall tumors (bone, breast, and soft tissue), congenital defects, and chest wall osteoradionecrosis often require extensive full-thickness local excisions to guarantee safe oncological margins (in cases of tumors) and complex reconstruction to provide stabilization and good biomechanical results avoiding postoperative respiratory failure. Thus, a personalized approach is required when dealing with chest wall defects, and reconstruction is planned. This review summarizes failed chest wall reconstruction procedures, identifies causes of failure, and highlights principles for complex chest wall reconstruction post-failure.

Methods

We performed a narrative review of the literature on PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, including all the relevant studies published from 1970.

Key Content and Findings

The available experiences in literature are only anecdotic and no current guidelines or rules exist on this topic, also given to its rarity. Proper pre-surgical planning and a multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion are crucial for complex cases such as infections and radiation-induced chest ulcers after previous surgical treatment. Procedures should eventually include thoracic wall debridement, necrotic tissue excision, pulse-jet lavage, prosthesis removal, and vacuum assisted closure (VAC) therapy as a bridge for chest wall re-reconstruction. Sternotomy wounds require wire and prosthesis removal, and the use of meshes or bone allografts. This review aims to summarize experiences and highlight surgical and oncologic principles for complex chest wall reconstruction after failure.

Conclusions

This review summarizes literature experiences to identify common key points for chest wall reconstruction after failure and to give some advice to surgeons managing this rare, challenging surgery.

Use of a Porous Alumina Antibiotic-Loaded Ceramic to Treat Bone Defect and Bone Infection After Road Trauma

To describe the use of a porous alumina ceramic loaded with antibiotics for the reconstruction of bilateral tibial fractures in a patient who presented with bone loss and infection after a motorcycle road injury. A 70-year-old man presented open fractures of his both tibiae (proximal involvement on the right side and diaphyseal on the left side). After initial treatment with multiple débridements and the placement of bilateral external fixators, he had bone loss to both tibiae and had developed infections of both legs with multiple organisms identified (Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Enterobacter cloacae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa). We used a porous alumina ceramic, designed according to the defects to fill. This ceramic was loaded with antibiotics (gentamicin and vancomycin). The goal was to obtain locally high concentrations of antibiotics to eradicate bacteria that could have remain in the surgical wound. Ceramic parts were placed 4 months after the trauma. Local antibiotic concentrations largely exceeded the pharmacological parameters for antibiotics efficacy. External fixators were removed 3 months after implantation. After a follow-up of more than 1 year, there is no relapse of infection, and the patient resumed walking while ceramic parts were left in place and that bone started colonizing ceramic parts. This ceramic that combines strength and the possibility of antibiotic loading allows thinking of new ways to treat infected fractures with bone loss. Indeed, its mechanical strength provides primary stability, and antibiotics make it possible to secure implantation in an infected area.