The impact of beta-blocker use on postoperative atrial fibrillation after aortic valve replacement

Prophylactic Left Atrial Appendage Ligation During Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Allows Safe Avoidance of Anticoagulation Regardless of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation

Background New-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is the most common arrhythmia following cardiac surgery. POAF increases the risk of thromboembolism and stroke, as well as morbidity and mortality more generally. Despite evidence from the landmark PROTECT-AF and PREVAIL trials, left atrial appendage ligation (LAAL) is not routinely performed for thromboembolism prophylaxis in POAF, and anticoagulation remains the standard of care along with dual antiplatelet therapy. This study evaluated the efficacy of concomitant LAAL in eliminating the need for postoperative anticoagulation, regardless of POAF development, in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods Between 2019 and 2021, 130 patients were selected to undergo concomitant LAAL while undergoing CABG surgery. Patients were then monitored for the incidence of new-onset POAF, and anticoagulation was strictly avoided for this indication. Demographic and outcome data were collected, with endpoints including transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke, death, and readmission within one year, as well as the length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. Results POAF occurred in 37 patients (28.5%), consistent with previous reports. However, none of the POAF patients experienced TIA or stroke during the one-year follow-up period, compared to 2 (2.15%) in the non-POAF group, a typical rate of postoperative stroke in such a patient population. No significant differences were observed between POAF and non-POAF cohorts in one-year stroke, all-cause mortality, readmission rates, or total hospital stay. Interestingly, the POAF cohort had a significantly longer mean ICU stay (4.24 vs 3.37 days, p = 0.0219), possibly due to the time required for arrhythmia control before discharge. The study population had a high mean CHA2DS2-VASc score (2.81), indicating an increased risk of thromboembolism, and a high mean HAS-BLED score, suggesting an elevated bleeding risk with anticoagulation. Conclusions LAAL appears to be an effective adjunct to CABG for thromboembolism prophylaxis in POAF. Formal anticoagulation was avoided in this study, with no significant differences in adverse events between POAF and non-POAF groups, suggesting that LAAL may be a suitable alternative to anticoagulation, especially in high-risk patients (e.g., those with elevated CHA2DS2-VASc or HAS-BLED scores). The safety and efficacy of this approach should be corroborated by larger randomized studies, such as the ongoing LeAAPS trial. LAAL during CABG may help reduce the risk of bleeding complications associated with anticoagulation while maintaining protection against thromboembolic events in patients who develop POAF.

Evaluation of Perioperative Beta-Blockers and Factors Associated with Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Cardiac Surgery: A Single Center Experience

Background

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) has a complex etiology, and beta-blockers are commonly recommended for its pharmacological prevention. This study aims to assess the impact of beta-blocker therapy on postoperative AF occurrence in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, mitral valve replacement, surgical revascularization of the myocardium, or a combination of these procedures.

Methods

The study encompassed 472 patients who received aortic valve replacement, mitral valve replacement, surgical revascularization, or their combination. We evaluated the efficacy of preoperative and one-month postoperative beta-blocker administration in preventing postoperative AF, and the associated risk factors involved in the development of postoperative AF.

Results

Of the total patient population, 36% experienced postoperative AF. Our study demonstrated a significant reduction in postoperative AF incidence among patients receiving beta-blocker treatment (all p-values < 0.05). Additionally, one-month post-surgery, beta-blocker treatment exerted a protective effect by maintaining the sinus rhythm (p = 0.0001). Regarding the risk factors involved in the development of postoperative AF, both age and left atrium (LA) sizeassessed pre-and postoperatively-were positively correlated with the occurrence of postoperative AF (p = 0.006). No relationship was found between leukocyte counts and AF incidence. Notably, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were significantly elevated on the fifth postoperative day in patients with AF (p < 0.007). The duration of ischemia was significantly longer in patients with AF (p = 0.009).

Conclusions

This study establishes the efficacy of perioperative beta-blocker treatment in mitigating postoperative AF. One month post-surgery, most patients under beta-blocker therapy maintained sinus rhythm, suggesting a potential long-term protective effect of beta-blockers against late-onset AF.

Combination prophylactic amiodarone with beta-blockers versus beta-blockers in atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: A systematic-review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Guideline recommendations regarding the preferred preventive measures for postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) are unclear, nor have we found any review articles addressing the combination of amiodarone and beta-blockers for the prevention of POAF.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy and safety of combination beta-blockers and amiodarone in the prevention of POAF while also comparing the use of amiodarone and beta-blockers individually.

METHODS

We used Pubmed as the primary resource. POAF incidence was the primary outcome of this study. The secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, treatment-related drug discontinuation (TRDD), and mortality. The random-effects model assessed all pooled outcomes with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical significance was set at p≤0.05.

RESULTS

The amiodarone subgroup of POAF incidence saw a Risk Ratio (RR) of 0.81 [0.63, 1.06], p=0.12, while the combination subgroup resulted in a RR of 0.63 [0.49, 0.80], p <0.001. TRDD for the amiodarone subgroup resulted in a RR of 0.68 [0.25, 1.82], p=0.44, while the combination subgroup saw a RR of 0.84 [0.57, 1.23], p=0.36. For mortality, the amiodarone subgroup resulted in a RR of 0.97 [0.48, 1.98], p=0.93, while the combination subgroup resulted in a RR of 1.04 [0.27, 4.05], p=0.96. Both hospital and ICU LOS saw no significant difference between treatment arms for both the combination subgroup and amiodarone alone. Except for the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) in the combination prophylaxis group, most of the measured outcomes did not meet the optimized information size (OIS) that was estimated.

CONCLUSION

Combination prophylaxis with amiodarone and beta-blockers significantly lowered risks of POAF incidence in comparison to beta-blockers alone while also having comparative mortality and TRDD outcomes.