Uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer: safety and advantages in employing complementary intraoperative lung ultrasound

Ultrasound for Intra-Operative Detection of Peri-Centimetric Pulmonary Nodules in Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS): A Comparison with Conventional Techniques in Multiportal VATS

Background: Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has become the gold-standard approach for lung resections. Given the impossibility of digital palpation, we witnessed the progressive development of peri-centimetric and deeply located pulmonary nodule alternative detection techniques. Intra-operative lung ultrasound is an increasingly effective diagnostic method, although only a few small studies have evaluated its accuracy. This study analyzed the effectiveness and sensitivity of uniportal VATS with intra-operative lung ultrasound (ILU), in comparison to multiportal VATS, for visualizing solitary and deep-sited pulmonary nodules. Methods: Patient data from October 2021 to October 2023, from a single center, were retrospectively gathered and analyzed. In total, 31 patients who received ILU-aided uniportal VATS (Group A) were matched for localization time, operative time, sensitivity, and post-operative complications, with 33 undergoing nodule detection with conventional techniques, such as manual or instrumental palpation, in multiportal VATS (Group B). Surgeries were carried out by the same team and ILU was performed by a certified operator. Results: Group A presented a significantly shorter time for nodule detection [median (IQR): 9 (8-10) vs. 14 (12.5-15) min; p < 0.001] and operative time [median (IQR): 33 (29-38) vs. 43 (39-47) min; p < 0.001]. All nodules were correctly localized and resected in Group A (sensitivity 100%), while three were missed in Group B (sensitivity 90.9%). Two patients in Group B presented with a prolonged air leak that was conservatively managed, compared to none in Group A, resulting in a post-operative morbidity rate of 6.1% vs. 0% (p = 0.16). Conclusions: ILU-aided uniportal VATS was faster and more effective than conventional techniques in multiportal VATS for nodule detection.

Intraoperative lung ultrasound improves subcentimetric pulmonary nodule localization during VATS: Results of a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) resection of deep-seated lung nodules smaller than 1 cm is extremely challenging. Several methods have been proposed to overcome this limitation but with not neglectable complications. Intraoperative lung ultrasound (ILU) is the latest minimally invasive proposed technique. The aim of the current study was to analyze the accuracy and efficacy of ILU associated with VATS to visualize solitary and deep-seated pulmonary nodules smaller than 1 cm.

METHODS

Patients with subcentimetric solitary and deep-seated pulmonary nodules were included in this retrospective study from November 2020 to December 2022. Patients who received VATS aided with ILU were considered as group A and patients who received conventional VATS as group B (control group). The rate of nodule identification and the time for localization with VATS alone and with VATS aided with ILU in each group were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 43 patients received VATS aided with ILU (group A) and 31 patients received conventional VATS (group B). Mean operative time was lower in group A (p < 0.05). In group A all the nodules were correctly identified, while in group B in one case the localization failed. The time to identify the lesion was lower in group A (7.1 ± 2.2 vs. 13.8 ± 4.6; p < 0.05). During hospitalization three patients (6.5%; p < 0.05) in group B presented air leaks that were conservatively managed.

CONCLUSION

Intracavitary VATS-US is a reliable, feasible, real-time and effective method of localization of parenchymal lung nodules during selected wedge resection procedures.

Intraoperative Lung Ultrasound (ILU) for the Assessment of Pulmonary Nodules

Background: The primary aim of this study was to confirm the validity of intraoperative lung ultrasound (ILU) as a safe and effective method of localization for difficult to visualize pulmonary nodules during Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) and open thoracotomy. The secondary aim was to enhance knowledge on the morphological patterns of presentation of pulmonary nodules on direct ultrasound examination. Materials and methods: 131 patients with lung nodule and indication for surgery were enrolled. All patients underwent pre-operative imaging of the chest, including Chest Computed Tomography (CT) and Transthoracic Ultrasound (TUS), and surgical procedures for histological assessment of pulmonary nodules (VATS or open thoracotomy). Results: The identification of 100.00% of lung nodules was allowed by ILU, while the detection rate of digital palpation was 94.66%. It was not possible to associate any specific ILU echostructural pattern to both benign or malignant lesions. However, the actual histological margins of the lesions in the operating samples were corresponding to those visualized at ILU in 125/131 (95.42%) cases. No complications have been reported with ILU employment. Conclusions: In our experience, ILU performed during both open surgery and VATS demonstrated to be a reliable and safe method for visualization and localization of pulmonary nodules non previously assessed on digital palpation. In addition, ILU showed to allow a clear nodule’s margins’ definition matching, in most cases, with the actual histological margins.