Choosing the right survey-patient reported outcomes in esophageal surgery

Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Upper GI Malignancies

Upper gastrointestinal (GI) conditions vastly affect each individual's physical, social, and emotional status. The decision-making process by the medical personnel about these patients is currently based on a patient's life quality evaluation scale, HRQL scales. By utilizing HRQL scales, a better understanding of the various surgical and non-surgical treatment options, as well as their long-term consequences, can be achieved. In our study, an organ-based approach is used in an attempt to examine and characterized the effect of upper GI surgery on HRQL. Therefore, HRQL scales' function as a prognostic tool is useful, and the need for future research, the creation of valid training programs, and modern guidelines is highlighted.

Mapping the literature on decision regret in patients with non-communicable diseases (NCDs): a scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION

Decision regret refers to feelings of remorse or dissatisfaction with a decision made regarding the treatment. Mapping the meaningful aspects of decision regret in patients with non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is necessary to provide a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon and inform the development of effective interventions to address it. For this reason, this protocol aimed to describe the methodological aspects of a scoping review focused on mapping all the meaningful aspects of decision regret in patients with NCDs and provide a conceptual and comprehensive framework of the phenomenon.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The study described in this protocol will be performed following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews. The anticipated starting time is July/August 2023 and the anticipated end of the review is June 2024. This scoping review will include quantitative, qualitative, primary and secondary literature, as well as grey literature on decision regret in patients with NCDs. The systematic search will be performed by consulting PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar. English-language articles from any context will be eligible for inclusion. Two independent reviewers will take part in an iterative process of evaluating literature, choosing papers and extracting data. Disagreements among reviewers will be solved through consensus meetings. Results will be presented in relation to the review question by employing tables, figures and narrative summaries.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This scoping review did not require ethical approval since it involves a literature review and does not include new data collection from human participants. The results of the review will provide a summary of the available literature on decision regret experienced by patients with NCDs, which is crucial for developing preventive educational interventions in situations where multiple therapeutic options are available.

Supercharged Jejunal Interposition

Complex esophageal reconstruction represents a high risk and challenging procedure. A dedicated pathway with multispecialty teams can facilitate a systematic checklist approach to perioperative management and evaluation of long-term outcomes. Refinements in the operative technique for supercharged pedicled jejunum (SPJ) for long segment interposition in esophageal reconstruction are reviewed in this article. Medical and surgical complications among this complex niche group of patients are significant and require care in specialist centers with a focused team. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in long-segment SPJ interposition are recognized to provide additional monitoring of surgical outcomes and may help guide interventions for subsequent symptom control.

Sternal lifting increases the operating space in esophagectomy via mediastinoscopy: a prospective cohort study

Background

Esophagectomy with combined single-port inflatable mediastinoscopy and laparoscopy reduces the risk of postoperative respiratory complications as it obviates the need to pass through the pleural space. However, it has strict indications owing to the narrow space for operation. Therefore, we adopted a sternal lifting method using a retractor that enables the expansion of the operating space, a technique which has not been previously reported. We describe our experience and report the results of an evaluation of this new approach.

Methods

Thirty-nine patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinomas underwent esophagectomy using combined single-port inflatable mediastinoscopy and laparoscopy from March 2019 to August 2021. Among them, 20 cases received sternal suspension [sternal suspension group (SS group)], and 19 cases did not receive sternal suspension [non-sternal suspension group (NSS group)]. The short-term efficacy of the two groups was observed.

Results

Patients in the SS group had a shorter intramediastinal operation time (82.50 vs. 110.00 minutes; P<0.001), more dissected chest lymph nodes (14 vs. 12; P=0.036), and a lower incidence of postoperative hoarseness (2 vs. 6; P=0.235) than did those in the NSS group. There were no significant differences between the SS group and NSS group in terms of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, post-surgical pathologic TNM classification (pTNM), post-surgical pathologic tumor classification (pT), post-surgical pathologic extent of lymph node involvement (pN), and total number of dissected lymph nodes. There were no statistical differences in the incidence of anastomotic fistula, respiratory complications, arrhythmia, or chylothorax between the two groups. There was no mortality during hospitalization in the two groups.

Conclusions

Sternal lifting increases the working space in esophagectomy via mediastinoscopy. It can make video-assisted radical esophagectomy by a transmediastinal approach with total pneumomediastinum assistance (VARETT) easier to perform, and sternal suspension in VARETT is safe and effective.