FDA-led consortium studies advance quality control of targeted next generation sequencing assays for precision oncology

Next-generation sequencing as a valuable tool for mutational spectrum in advanced-stage NSCLC patients

Background and aim

Lung cancer remains one of the most threatening malignancies, ranking as the second most diagnosed cancer, and it continues to be the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Challenges persist with late diagnosis and the high mutational burden characteristic of lung cancer.

Methods

Our study focuses on identifying the mutational spectrum of a cohort of advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients using a minimally invasive method through blood collection. To analyze the mutational landscape of these patients, we employed plasma DNA for the next-generation sequencing (NGS) cancer panel Ion Torrent, which contains 50 of the most mutated genes in lung cancer. All protocols for extraction, quality and quantity control, and library preparation follow the manufacturer's rules. Bioinformatics analysis was performed to select pathogenic mutations versus non-pathogenic-benign ones.

Results

This approach is particularly valuable for patients in advanced stages (III and IV, n=10) of lung adenocarcinoma and lung squamous cell carcinoma, who lack surgical options and limited therapeutic avenues. The comprehensive sequencing analysis revealed that nine of the ten lung cancer patients carried a TP53 mutation. Also, several other mutations exist in various cases, showing heterogeneous profiling.

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate the potential of liquid biopsies in providing crucial genetic insights that can guide personalized treatment strategies, improving the management and outcomes for patients with advanced lung cancer.

Contrived Materials and a Data Set for the Evaluation of Liquid Biopsy Tests: A Blood Profiling Atlas in Cancer (BLOODPAC) Community Study

The Blood Profiling Atlas in Cancer (BLOODPAC) Consortium is a collaborative effort involving stakeholders from the public, industry, academia, and regulatory agencies focused on developing shared best practices on liquid biopsy. This report describes the results from the JFDI (Just Freaking Do It) study, a BLOODPAC initiative to develop standards on the use of contrived materials mimicking cell-free circulating tumor DNA, to comparatively evaluate clinical laboratory testing procedures. Nine independent laboratories tested the concordance, sensitivity, and specificity of commercially available contrived materials with known variant-allele frequencies (VAFs) ranging from 0.1% to 5.0%. Each participating laboratory utilized its own proprietary evaluation procedures. The results demonstrated high levels of concordance and sensitivity at VAFs of >0.1%, but reduced concordance and sensitivity at a VAF of 0.1%; these findings were similar to those from previous studies, suggesting that commercially available contrived materials can support the evaluation of testing procedures across multiple technologies. Such materials may enable more objective comparisons of results on materials formulated in-house at each center in multicenter trials. A unique goal of the collaborative effort was to develop a data resource, the BLOODPAC Data Commons, now available to the liquid-biopsy community for further study. This resource can be used to support independent evaluations of results, data extension through data integration and new studies, and retrospective evaluation of data collection.