The relationship between the degree of brain edema regression and changes in cognitive function in patients with recurrent glioma treated with bevacizumab and temozolomide

Effect of low-dose bevacizumab on health-related quality of life in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma: A retrospective clinical study

BACKGROUND

We retrospectively analyzed the effects of low-dose bevacizumab (BEV) combined with temozolomide (TMZ) on health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (rHGG).

METHODS

A total of 129 patients with rHGG were included in this study. Patients were divided into a combination group and TMZ group based on the treatment they received. The Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and EORTC Brain Cancer Module (QLQ-BN20) were used to evaluate HRQL in all patients before and after treatment. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-squared test. The data for all continuous variables were first tested for a normal distribution. If the data conformed to a normal distribution, a T test was used for comparison. If the data did not conform to a normal distribution, the rank-sum test was used.

RESULTS

There were differences in PFS and PFS-6 between the BEV + TMZ and TMZ groups (P＜0.05). However, there was no difference in the OS between the two groups (P＞0.05). The BEV + TMZ group performed better than the TMZ group in both the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BN20. In addition, the KPS score was higher in the BEV + TMZ group than in the TMZ group. Steroid doses given were lower in the BEV + TMZ group than in the TMZ group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose BEV + TMZ can relieve the clinical symptoms of rHGG patients, reduce their steroid dose, improve HRQL, and prolong PFS, but does not bear any benefit on OS.

A common low dimensional structure of cognitive impairment in stroke and brain tumors

INTRODUCTION

Neuropsychological studies infer brain-behavior relationships from focal lesions like stroke and tumors. However, these pathologies impair brain function through different mechanisms even when they occur at the same brain's location. The aim of this study was to compare the profile of cognitive impairment in patients with brain tumors vs. stroke and examine the correlation with lesion location in each pathology.

METHODS

Patients with first time stroke (n = 77) or newly diagnosed brain tumors (n = 76) were assessed with a neuropsychological battery. Their lesions were mapped with MRI scans. Test scores were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) to measure their correlation, and logistic regression to examine differences between pathologies. Next, with ridge regression we examined whether lesion features (location, volume) were associated with behavioral performance.

RESULTS

The PCA showed a similar cognitive impairment profile in tumors and strokes with three principal components (PCs) accounting for about half of the individual variance. PC1 loaded on language, verbal memory, and executive/working memory; PC2 loaded on general performance, visuo-spatial attention and memory, and executive functions; and, PC3 loaded on calculation, reading and visuo-spatial attention. The average lesion distribution was different, and lesion location was correlated with cognitive deficits only in stroke. Logistic regression found language and calculation more affected in stroke, and verbal memory and verbal fluency more affected in tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

A similar low dimensional set of behavioral impairments was found both in stroke and brain tumors, even though each pathology caused some specific deficits in different domains. The lesion distribution was different for stroke and tumors and correlated with behavioral impairment only in stroke.

Prevalence, risk factors and prognostic value of anxiety and depression in recurrent glioma patients

Anxiety and depression are frequently noticed in glioma patients, while few studies report this issue in recurrent glioma patients. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of anxiety and depression, as well as their risk factors and prognostic value in recurrent glioma patients. Eighty recurrent glioma patients, 40 newly-diagnosed glioma patients, and 40 healthy controls were enrolled in this study. Then, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for anxiety (HADS-A) and for depression (HADS-D) were used to assess the anxiety and depression status of all subjects. The HADS-A score (8.6 ± 3.3 vs. 7.0 ± 2.9 vs. 4.3 ± 2.5), anxiety rate (58.8% vs. 32.5% vs. 10.0%), HADS-D score (7.9 ± 3.0 vs. 6.9 ± 3.1 vs. 4.0 ± 2.6), and depression rate (45.0% vs. 30.0% vs. 7.5%) were all highest in recurrent glioma patients, followed by newly-diagnosed glioma patients, and were lowest in healthy controls (all P < 0.001). Furthermore, female sex (vs. male sex) was independently correlated with anxiety (odds ratio (OR): 3.042, P = 0.029); meanwhile, higher World Health Organization (WHO) pathological grade was independently correlated with depression (OR: 2.573, P = 0.019) in recurrent glioma patients. Additionally, anxiety was correlated with shortened progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.028) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.047), while depression only had a correlation trend with shortened PFS (without statistical significance) (P = 0.069) and was associated with shortened OS (P = 0.035) in recurrent glioma patients. The prevalence of anxiety and depression is high in recurrent glioma patients, which relates to gender, WHO pathological grade, and estimates worsen survival.

Factors affecting cognitive functions of patients with high-grade gliomas: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Gliomas make up approximately 26.5% of all primary CNS tumors and 80.7% of malignant tumors. They are classified according to histology, location, and genetics. Grade III and IV gliomas are considered high-grade gliomas (HGGs). The cognitive signs and symptoms are attributed to mass defects depending on location, growth rapidity, and edema. Our purpose is to review the cognitive status of patients diagnosed with HGGs; the effect of treatments including surgical resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy; and the predictors of the cognitive status.

METHODS

We utilized the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines as a template for the methodology. A comprehensive literature search was performed from three databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library) for clinical trials and longitudinal studies on patients diagnosed with HGGs assessing their cognitive status.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were selected among which 9 assessed cognitive function before and after treatment. One assessed the consistency of cognitive complaints and objective cognitive functioning. Three reported factors affecting disease progression and cognitive status. Most HGG patients have impairment in at least one cognitive domain. Treatments including surgical resection or radio-chemotherapy did not impair cognitive status.

DISCUSSION

The cognitive status could be used to assess sub-clinical tumor progression. Factors correlated to cognitive status were tumor location, edema, and grade. Patient characteristics correlated were pre-operative epilepsy, corticosteroid use, and age at the time of diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Assessment of the cognitive status of HGG patients indicates sub-clinical tumor progression and may be used to assess treatment outcomes.