Development and validation of a nomogram based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and elastography-derived data for the stratification of patients with prostate cancer

Risk calculators for the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer (PCa) (early) detection poses significant challenges, including unnecessary testing and the risk of potential overdiagnosis. The European Association of Urology therefore suggests an individual risk-adapted approach, incorporating risk calculators (RCs) into the PCa detection pathway. In the context of 'The PRostate Cancer Awareness and Initiative for Screening in the European Union' (PRAISE-U) project ( https://uroweb.org/praise-u ), we aim to provide an overview of the currently available clinical RCs applicable in an early PCa detection algorithm.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review to identify RCs predicting detection of clinically significant PCa at biopsy. A search was performed in the databases Medline ALL, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar for publications between January 2010 and July 2023. We retrieved relevant literature by using the terms "prostate cancer", "screening/diagnosis" and "predictive model". Inclusion criteria included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and clinical trials. Exclusion criteria applied to studies involving pre-targeted high-risk populations, diagnosed PCa patients, or a sample sizes under 50 men.

RESULTS

We identified 6474 articles, of which 140 were included after screening abstracts and full texts. In total, we identified 96 unique RCs. Among these, 45 underwent external validation, with 28 validated in multiple cohorts. Of the externally validated RCs, 17 are based on clinical factors, 19 incorporate clinical factors along with MRI details, 4 were based on blood biomarkers alone or in combination with clinical factors, and 5 included urinary biomarkers. The median AUC of externally validated RCs ranged from 0.63 to 0.93.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review offers an extensive analysis of currently available RCs, their variable utilization, and performance within validation cohorts. RCs have consistently demonstrated their capacity to mitigate the limitations associated with early detection and have been integrated into modern practice and screening trials. Nevertheless, the lack of external validation data raises concerns about numerous RCs, and it is crucial to factor in this omission when evaluating whether a specific RC is applicable to one's target population.

A novel model incorporating quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound into PI-RADSv2-based nomogram detecting clinically significant prostate cancer

The diagnostic accuracy of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADSv2) is limited by subjectivity in result interpretation and the false positive results from certain similar anatomic structures. We aimed to establish a new model combining quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound, PI-RADSv2, clinical parameters to optimize the PI-RADSv2-based model. The analysis was conducted based on a data set of 151 patients from 2019 to 2022, multiple regression analysis showed that prostate specific antigen density, age, PI-RADSv2, quantitative parameters (rush time, wash-out area under the curve) were independent predictors. Based on these predictors, we established a new predictive model, the AUCs of the model were 0.910 and 0.879 in training and validation cohort, which were higher than those of PI-RADSv2-based model (0.865 and 0.821 in training and validation cohort). Net Reclassification Index analysis indicated that the new predictive model improved the classification of patients. Decision curve analysis showed that in most risk probabilities, the new predictive model improved the clinical utility of PI-RADSv2-based model. Generally, this new predictive model showed that quantitative parameters from contrast enhanced ultrasound could help to improve the diagnostic performance of PI-RADSv2 based model in detecting csPCa.

Development and validation of a clinical-radiomics model for prediction of prostate cancer: a multicenter study

PURPOSE

To develop an early diagnosis model of prostate cancer based on clinical-radiomics to improve the accuracy of imaging diagnosis of prostate cancer.

METHODS

The multicenter study enrolled a total of 449 patients with prostate cancer from December 2017 to January 2022. We retrospectively collected information from 342 patients who underwent prostate biopsy at Minhang Hospital. We extracted T2WI images through 3D-Slice, and used mask tools to mark the prostate area manually. The radiomics features were extracted by Python using the "Pyradiomics" module. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was used for data dimensionality reduction and feature selection, and the radiomics score was calculated according to the correlation coefficients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to develop predictive models. We incorporated the radiomics score, PI-RADS, and clinical features, and this was presented as a nomogram. The model was validated using a cohort of 107 patients from the Xuhui Hospital.

RESULTS

In total, 110 effective radiomics features were extracted. Finally, 9 features were significantly associated with the diagnosis of prostate cancer, from which we calculated the radiomics score. The predictors contained in the individualized prediction nomogram included age, fPSA/tPSA, PI-RADS, and radiomics score. The clinical-radiomics model showed good discrimination in the validation cohort (C-index = 0.88).

CONCLUSION

This study presents a clinical-radiomics model that incorporates age, fPSA/PSA, PI-RADS, and radiomics score, which can be conveniently used to facilitate individualized prediction of prostate cancer before prostate biopsy.

Assessment of elastographic Q-analysis score combined with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) based on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)/multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) fusion-guided biopsy in differentiating benign and malignant prostate

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has advantages in the diagnosis of prostate diseases, but there is also overdiagnosis. We compensate for this with fusion imaging and elastography. In this study, we want to evaluate Elastographic Q-analysis score (EQS) combined with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), based on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)/multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) fusion biopsy in differentiating benign and malignant prostate lesions.

METHODS

A total of 296 patients with 318 prostate lesions who underwent TRUS/MP-MRI fusion biopsy between October 2017 and October 2019 were retrospectively analysed. The performance of the EQS was evaluated on the sites of the suspicious areas of MP-MRI. The cut-off value of EQS was obtained according to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, which was used to upgrade and downgrade the PI-RADS scores. The area under the curve (AUC), integrated discrimination improvement, and decision curve analysis were used to assess the new PI-RADS performance.

RESULTS

In total, 318 MP-MRI suspicious prostate lesions (94 malignant vs. 224 benign lesions). The EQS optimal threshold was 1.85, and the AUC was 0.816. All cases were constructed three models by using 1.85 as the cut-off value: upgrade-PI-RADS, downgrade-PI-RADS and complex-PI-RADS. The AUC of PI-RADS, upgrade-PI-RADS, downgrade-PI-RADS and complex-PI-RADS were 0.869, 0.867, 0.872 and 0.873 respectively. The diagnostic coincidence rate of PI-RADS was increased from 0.667 to 0.874 by using strain elastography, among which the diagnostic rate of prostate cancer was increased from 0.557 to 0.806, and the diagnostic rate of non-prostate cancer was increased from 0.775 to 0.967. The integrated discrimination improvement indicated that downgrade-PI-RADS had a better diagnostic capability (P<0.05). The net benefit of all models, which downgrade-PI-RADS can maximize the net benefit value of patients by decision curve analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of PI-RADS and EQS with TRUS/MP-MRI fusion, particularly downgrade-PI-RADS, can reduce unnecessary biopsy procedures and prevent overdiagnosis.

Alternatives for MRI in Prostate Cancer Diagnostics-Review of Current Ultrasound-Based Techniques

The purpose of this review is to present the current role of ultrasound-based techniques in the diagnostic pathway of prostate cancer (PCa). With overdiagnosis and overtreatment of a clinically insignificant PCa over the past years, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) started to be recommended for every patient suspected of PCa before performing a biopsy. It enabled targeted sampling of the suspicious prostate regions, improving the accuracy of the traditional systematic biopsy. However, mpMRI is associated with high costs, relatively low availability, long and separate procedure, or exposure to the contrast agent. The novel ultrasound modalities, such as shear wave elastography (SWE), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), or high frequency micro-ultrasound (MicroUS), may be capable of maintaining the performance of mpMRI without its limitations. Moreover, the real-time lesion visualization during biopsy would significantly simplify the diagnostic process. Another value of these new techniques is the ability to enhance the performance of mpMRI by creating the image fusion of multiple modalities. Such models might be further analyzed by artificial intelligence to mark the regions of interest for investigators and help to decide about the biopsy indications. The dynamic development and promising results of new ultrasound-based techniques should encourage researchers to thoroughly study their utilization in prostate imaging.

Value of transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound with clinical indicators in the prediction of bone metastasis in prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound is an examination that can be used to diagnose and characterize prostate cancer by displaying tissue blood perfusion. To explore the value of transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with clinical factors in predicting prostate cancer bone metastasis.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination data, imaging examination data [single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT), CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and/or bone scan], clinical laboratory data, and pathological Gleason score of 163 patients with prostate cancer. They were randomly divided into the modeling and validation data sets. A model for predicting prostate cancer bone metastasis was established by logistic regression in the modeling data set. The differentiation, consistency, and benefits of the model were verified using the validation data set. A nomogram of the prediction model for bone metastasis of prostate cancer was drawn.

RESULTS

Among 163 patients with prostate cancer, 65 had bone metastasis. Total prostate-specific antigen, alkaline phosphatase, and the transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound parameter area under the curve were independently associated with prostate cancer bone metastasis, with OR values of 2.845, 2.839, and 1.004, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the prostate cancer bone metastasis prediction model was 0.804. In the training set, using a cutoff of 0.659, sensitivity was 52.8%, and specificity was 95.7%. In the validation set, using a cutoff of 0.659, sensitivity was 58.6%, and specificity was 98.1%. The area under the curve of the validation set was 0.799. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed that the calibration ability of the validation set was not statistically different from the training set (P=0.136). The decision curve analysis showed that the model had high benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram that includes the transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound parameter area under the curve and the clinical parameters total prostate-specific antigen, and alkaline phosphatase can be used to personalize the risk of prostate cancer bone metastases.