Heritability of mammographic breast density

Biological Basis of Breast Cancer-Related Disparities in Precision Oncology Era

Precision oncology is based on deep knowledge of the molecular profile of tumors, allowing for more accurate and personalized therapy for specific groups of patients who are different in disease susceptibility as well as treatment response. Thus, onco-breastomics is able to discover novel biomarkers that have been found to have racial and ethnic differences, among other types of disparities such as chronological or biological age-, sex/gender- or environmental-related ones. Usually, evidence suggests that breast cancer (BC) disparities are due to ethnicity, aging rate, socioeconomic position, environmental or chemical exposures, psycho-social stressors, comorbidities, Western lifestyle, poverty and rurality, or organizational and health care system factors or access. The aim of this review was to deepen the understanding of BC-related disparities, mainly from a biomedical perspective, which includes genomic-based differences, disparities in breast tumor biology and developmental biology, differences in breast tumors' immune and metabolic landscapes, ecological factors involved in these disparities as well as microbiomics- and metagenomics-based disparities in BC. We can conclude that onco-breastomics, in principle, based on genomics, proteomics, epigenomics, hormonomics, metabolomics and exposomics data, is able to characterize the multiple biological processes and molecular pathways involved in BC disparities, clarifying the differences in incidence, mortality and treatment response for different groups of BC patients.

Breast density in NF1 women: a retrospective study

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant condition caused by neurofibromin haploinsufficiency due to pathogenic variants in the NF1 gene. Tumor predisposition has long been associated with NF1, and an increased breast cancer (BC) incidence and reduced survival have been reported in recent years for women with NF1. As breast density is another known independent risk factor for BC, this study aims to evaluate the variability of breast density in patients with NF1 compared to the general population. Mammograms from 98 NF1 women affected by NF1, and enrolled onto our monocentric BC screening program, were compared with those from 300 healthy subjects to verify differences in breast density. Mammograms were independently reviewed and scored by a radiologist and using a Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) software. The comparison of breast density between NF1 patients and controls was performed through Chi-squared test and with multivariable ordinal logistic models adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI), number of pregnancies, and menopausal status.breast density was influenced by BMI and menopausal status in both NF1 patients and healthy subjects. No difference in breast density was observed between NF1 patients and the healthy female population, even after considering the potential confounding factors.Although NF1 and a highly fibroglandular breast are known risk factors of BC, in this study, NF1 patients were shown to have comparable breast density to healthy subjects. The presence of pathogenic variants in the NF1 gene does not influence the breast density value.

Evaluation of SNPs associated with mammographic density in European women with mammographic density in Asian women from South-East Asia

PURPOSE

Mammographic density (MD), after accounting for age and body mass index (BMI), is a strong heritable risk factor for breast cancer. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified 64 SNPs in 55 independent loci associated with MD in women of European ancestry. Their associations with MD in Asian women, however, are largely unknown.

METHOD

Using linear regression adjusting for age, BMI, and ancestry-informative principal components, we evaluated the associations of previously reported MD-associated SNPs with MD in a multi-ethnic cohort of Asian ancestry. Area and volumetric mammographic densities were determined using STRATUS (N = 2450) and Volpara™ (N = 2257). We also assessed the associations of these SNPs with breast cancer risk in an Asian population of 14,570 cases and 80,870 controls.

RESULTS

Of the 61 SNPs available in our data, 21 were associated with MD at a nominal threshold of P value < 0.05, all in consistent directions with those reported in European ancestry populations. Of the remaining 40 variants with a P-value of association > 0.05, 29 variants showed consistent directions of association as those previously reported. We found that nine of the 21 MD-associated SNPs in this study were also associated with breast cancer risk in Asian women (P < 0.05), seven of which showed a direction of associations that was consistent with that reported for MD.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms the associations of 21 SNPs (19/55 or 34.5% out of all known MD loci identified in women of European ancestry) with area and/or volumetric densities in Asian women, and further supports the evidence of a shared genetic basis through common genetic variants for MD and breast cancer risk.

A new nomogram for predicting the malignant diagnosis of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) ultrasonography category 4A lesions in women with dense breast tissue in the diagnostic setting

Background

Biopsy has been recommended for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 lesions. However, the malignancy rate of category 4A lesions is very low (2-10%). Therefore, most biopsies of category 4A lesions are benign, and the results will generally cause additional health care costs and patient anxiety.

Methods

A prediction model was developed based on an analysis of 418 BI-RADS ultrasonography (US) category 4A patients at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were applied to identify significant variables for inclusion in the final nomogram. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability were evaluated using the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curves. An independent cohort of 97 patients from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University was used for external validation.

Results

The independent risk factors from the multivariate analysis for the training cohort were family history of breast cancer (OR =4.588, P=0.004), US features [margin (OR =2.916, P=0.019), shape (irregular vs. oval, OR =2.474, P=0.044; round vs. oval, OR =1.935, P=0.276), parallel orientation vs. not parallel (OR =2.204, P=0.040)], low suspicious lymph nodes (OR =7.664, P=0.019), and suspicious calcifications on mammography (MG) (OR =6.736, P=0.001). The C-index was good in the training [0.813, 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.733 to 0.893] and validation cohorts (0.765, 95% CI, 0.584 to 0.946). The calibration curves showed optimal agreement between the nomogram prediction and actual observations for the probability of malignancy. Also, the cutoff score was set to 100 for discriminating high and low risk. The model performed well in discerning different risk groups.

Conclusions

We developed a well-discriminated and calibrated nomogram to predict the malignancy of BI-RADS US category 4A lesions in dense breast tissue, which may help clinicians identify patients at lower or higher risk.

Detection and recognition of ultrasound breast nodules based on semi-supervised deep learning: a powerful alternative strategy

BACKGROUND

The successful recognition of benign and malignant breast nodules using ultrasound images is based mainly on supervised learning that requires a large number of labeled images. However, because high-quality labeling is expensive and time-consuming, we hypothesized that semi-supervised learning could provide a low-cost and powerful alternative approach. This study aimed to develop an accurate semi-supervised recognition method and compared its performance with supervised methods and sonographers.

METHODS

The faster region-based convolutional neural network was used for nodule detection from ultrasound images. A semi-supervised classifier based on the mean teacher model was proposed to recognize benign and malignant nodule images. The general performance of the proposed method on two datasets (8,966 nodules) was reported.

RESULTS

The detection accuracy was 0.88±0.03 and 0.86±0.02, respectively, on two testing sets (1,350 and 2,220 nodules). When 800 labeled training nodules were available, the proposed semi-supervised model plus 4,396 unlabeled nodules performed better than the supervised learning model (area under the curve (AUC): 0.934±0.026 vs. 0.83±0.050; 0.916±0.022 vs. 0.815±0.049). The performance of the semi-supervised model trained on 800 labeled and 4,396 unlabeled nodules was close to that of the supervised learning model trained on a massive number of labeled nodules (n=5,196) (AUC: 0.934±0.026 vs. 0.952±0.027; 0.916±0.022 vs. 0.918±0.017). Moreover, the semi-supervised model was better than the average accuracy of five human sonographers (AUC: 0.922 vs. 0.889).

CONCLUSIONS

The semi-supervised model can achieve excellent performance for nodule recognition and be useful for medical sciences. The method reduced the number of labeled images required for training, thus significantly alleviating the difficulty in data preparation of medical artificial intelligence.