1
|
García-Mejido JA, Martín-Martinez A, García-Jimenez R, González-Diaz E, Núñez-Matas MJ, Fernández-Palacín F, Carballo-Rastrilla S, Fernández-Fernández C, Sainz-Bueno JA. Is the Presence of Levator Ani Muscle Avulsion Relevant for the Diagnosis of Uterine Prolapse? JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2024; 43:265-272. [PMID: 37853913 DOI: 10.1002/jum.16356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 09/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine if the addition of the assessment of levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion to the measurement of the difference in the pubis-uterine fundus distance between rest and with the Valsalva maneuver could increase the diagnostic capacity of ultrasound for uterine prolapse (UP). METHODS This multicenter, observational and prospective study included 145 patients. Ultrasound assessment was performed, establishing the diagnosis of UP as a difference between the pubic-uterine fundus distance at rest and during the Valsalva maneuver ≥15 mm (standard technique), while LAM avulsion was defined as an abnormal LAM insertion in three central slices using multislice ultrasound. A binary multivariate logistic regression model was made using nonautomated methods to predict surgical UP (general population, premenopausal, and postmenopausal patients), including the difference between the pubis-uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver as well as LAM avulsion. RESULTS A total of 143 patients completed the study. The addition of LAM avulsion criteria to the standard dynamic distance-based protocol for the diagnosis of UP resulted in a higher sensitivity for the general population (79.7 vs 68.1%) as well as for premenopausal (89.3 vs 79.9%) and postmenopausal patients (76 vs 66.1%). In contrast, the standard technique showed a higher specificity than the model based on the standard technique associated with LAM avulsion for the general population (89.2 vs 74.3%) and premenopausal women (91.7 vs 63.2%). For postmenopausal patients, the model based on the standard technique associated with LAM avulsion had a higher sensitivity (76 vs 66.1%) and specificity (91.7 vs 86.8%) than the ultrasound diagnosis of UP. CONCLUSION The implementation of the assessment of LAM avulsion in the ultrasound diagnosis of UP is useful in postmenopausal patients, increasing sensitivity and specificity relative to the ultrasound assessment based only on the difference between the pubis-uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Antonio García-Mejido
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Valme University Hospital, Seville, Spain
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | - Alicia Martín-Martinez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Healthcare Complex of Gran Canaria, Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Rocío García-Jimenez
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Juan Ramon Jiménez Hospital, Huelva, Spain
| | - Enrique González-Diaz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Healthcare Complex of Leon (CAULE), Leon, Spain
| | - María José Núñez-Matas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital of Malaga, Malaga, Spain
| | | | - Sonia Carballo-Rastrilla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Healthcare Complex of Gran Canaria, Gran Canaria, Spain
| | | | - José Antonio Sainz-Bueno
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Valme University Hospital, Seville, Spain
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
García-Mejido JA, Martín-Martinez A, González-Diaz E, Núñez-Matas MJ, Fernández-Palacín A, Carballo-Rastrilla S, Fernández-Fernández C, García-Jimenez R, Sainz-Bueno JA. Is It Possible to Diagnose Surgical Uterine Prolapse With Transperineal Ultrasound? Multicenter Validation of Diagnostic Software. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2023; 42:2673-2681. [PMID: 37421644 DOI: 10.1002/jum.16303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To validate an ultrasound software that uses transperineal ultrasound to diagnose uterine prolapse (UP). METHODS Multicenter, observational and prospective study with 155 patients that had indications for surgical intervention for dysfunctional pelvic floor pathology. Each patient underwent an examination with Pozzi tenaculum forceps was performed in the operating room with the patient anesthetized, followed by surgical correction of stages II-IV UP. Transperineal ultrasound was used to assess the difference in the pubis-uterine fundus measurement. With a multivariate logistic regression binary model (with the measurement ultrasound at rest, the Valsalva maneuver and age) using nonautomated methods to predict UP. With the purpose of evaluating the model, a table with coordinates of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, after which sensitivity and specificity were assessed. RESULTS A total of 153 patients were included (73 with a diagnosis of surgical UP). It was obtained from the AUC (0.89) of the probabilities predicted by the model (95% confidence interval, 0.84-0.95; P < .0005). Based on the ROC curve for the model, obtaining a sensitivity of 91.8% and a specificity of 72.7%, values that were superior to those for the clinical exam for surgical UP (sensitivity: 80.8%; specificity: 71.3%). CONCLUSIONS We validated software that uses transperineal ultrasound of the pelvic floor and patient age to generate a more reliable diagnosis of surgical UP than that obtained from clinical examinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Antonio García-Mejido
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Valme University Hospital, Seville, Spain
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | - Alicia Martín-Martinez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Healthcare Complex of Gran Canaria, Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Enrique González-Diaz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Healthcare Complex of Leon (CAULE), Leon, Spain
| | - María José Núñez-Matas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital of Malaga, Malaga, Spain
| | - Ana Fernández-Palacín
- Biostatistics Unit, Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | - Sonia Carballo-Rastrilla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Healthcare Complex of Gran Canaria, Gran Canaria, Spain
| | | | - Rocío García-Jimenez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juan Ramón Jimenez Hospital, Seville, Spain
| | - José Antonio Sainz-Bueno
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Valme University Hospital, Seville, Spain
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
García-Mejido JA, Martín-Martinez A, González-Diaz E, Núñez-Matas MJ, Fernández-Palacín A, Carballo-Rastrilla S, Fernández-Fernández C, Sainz-Bueno JA. Identification of Surgical Uterine Prolapse in Premenopausal Patients With Clinical or Ultrasound Criteria? A Multicenter Comparative Study. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2023; 42:2269-2275. [PMID: 37163226 DOI: 10.1002/jum.16248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Revised: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES It is unknown whether diagnosing uterine prolapse (UP) via ultrasound or surgical criteria is superior. Our objective is to determine whether the diagnostic capacity of ultrasound with surgical criteria differs from that of surgical criteria only. METHODS This was a multicenter prospective observational study with 54 premenopausal patients with surgical criteria for a dysfunctional pelvic floor pathology who were consecutively recruited for 1 year. Clinical UP with surgical criteria was defined when UP stage II-IV was identified (during pelvic floor consultation), and UP diagnosed by ultrasound with surgical criteria was established when a difference ≥15 mm was found between rest and Valsalva applied to the pubis-uterine fundus. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were determined to evaluate clinical and ultrasound methodologies as diagnostic tests. RESULTS UP diagnosed by ultrasound with surgical criteria presented better sensitivity (78.57 vs 35.71%), specificity (92.11 vs 81.58%), positive predictive value (61.83 vs 23.99%), and negative predictive value (96.35 vs 11.37%) than UP diagnosed by surgical criteria only. CONCLUSION Ultrasound with surgical criteria is superior to surgical criteria alone when diagnosing UP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Antonio García-Mejido
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Valme University Hospital, Seville, Spain
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | - Alicia Martín-Martinez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Gran Canarias, Gran Canarias, Spain
| | - Enrique González-Diaz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Leon (CAULE), León, Spain
| | - María José Núñez-Matas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Virgen de la Victoria of Malaga, Malaga, Spain
| | - Ana Fernández-Palacín
- Biostatistics Unit, Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | - Sonia Carballo-Rastrilla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Gran Canarias, Gran Canarias, Spain
| | - Camino Fernández-Fernández
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Leon (CAULE), León, Spain
| | - José Antonio Sainz-Bueno
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Valme University Hospital, Seville, Spain
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
García-Mejido JA, Ramos-Vega Z, Fernández-Palacín A, Borrero C, Valdivia M, Pelayo-Delgado I, Sainz-Bueno JA. Predictive Model for the Diagnosis of Uterine Prolapse Based on Transperineal Ultrasound. Tomography 2022; 8:1716-1725. [PMID: 35894009 PMCID: PMC9326672 DOI: 10.3390/tomography8040144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
We want to describe a model that allows the use of transperineal ultrasound to define the probability of experiencing uterine prolapse (UP). This was a prospective observational study involving 107 patients with UP or cervical elongation (CE) without UP. The ultrasound study was performed using transperineal ultrasound and evaluated the differences in the pubis−uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver. We generated different multivariate binary logistic regression models using nonautomated methods to predict UP, including the difference in the pubis−uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver. The parameters were added progressively according to their simplicity of use and their predictive capacity for identifying UP. We used two binary logistic regression models to predict UP. Model 1 was based on the difference in the pubis−uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver and the age of the patient [AUC: 0.967 (95% CI, 0.939−0.995; p < 0.0005)]. Model 2 used the difference in the pubis−uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver, age, avulsion and ballooning (AUC: 0.971 (95% CI, 0.945−0.997; p < 0.0005)). In conclusion, the model based on the difference in the pubis−uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver and the age of the patient could predict 96.7% of patients with UP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Antonio García-Mejido
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Valme University Hospital, 41014 Seville, Spain; (C.B.); (M.V.); (J.A.S.-B.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain
- Correspondence: (J.A.G.-M.); (A.F.-P.)
| | - Zenaida Ramos-Vega
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nuestra Señora de la Merced Hospital, 41640 Seville, Spain;
| | - Ana Fernández-Palacín
- Biostatistics Unit, Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain
- Correspondence: (J.A.G.-M.); (A.F.-P.)
| | - Carlota Borrero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Valme University Hospital, 41014 Seville, Spain; (C.B.); (M.V.); (J.A.S.-B.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain
| | - Maribel Valdivia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Valme University Hospital, 41014 Seville, Spain; (C.B.); (M.V.); (J.A.S.-B.)
| | - Irene Pelayo-Delgado
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, 28034 Madrid, Spain;
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alcalá de Henares, 28871 Madrid, Spain
| | - José Antonio Sainz-Bueno
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Valme University Hospital, 41014 Seville, Spain; (C.B.); (M.V.); (J.A.S.-B.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|