Enhanced ultrasound-guided versus non-enhanced ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle biopsy in tissue cellularity of lung malignancies: a propensity score matched study

Evaluating the efficacy of percutaneous puncture biopsy guided by contrast-enhanced ultrasound for peripheral pulmonary lesions

BACKGROUND

The incidence and mortality of lung cancer have increased annually. Accurate diagnosis can help improve therapeutic efficacy of interventions and prognosis. Percutaneous lung biopsy is a reliable method for the clinical diagnosis of lung cancer. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous lung biopsy technology has been widely promoted and applied in recent years.

AIM

To investigate the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-guided percutaneous biopsy in peripheral pulmonary lesions.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data on 237 patients with peripheral thoracic focal lesions who underwent puncture biopsy at Wuxi People's Hospital. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: The CEUS-guided before lesion puncture group (contrast group) and conventional ultrasound-guided group (control group). Analyze the diagnostic efficacy of the puncture biopsy, impact of tumor size, and number of puncture needles and complications were analyzed and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Accurate pathological results were obtained for 92.83% (220/237) of peripheral lung lesions during the first biopsy, with an accuracy rate of 95.8% (113/118) in the contrast group and 89.9% (107/119) in the control group. The difference in the area under the curve (AUC) between the contrast and the control groups was not statistically significant (0.952 vs 0.902, respectively; P > 0.05). However, when the lesion diameter ≥ 5 cm, the diagnostic AUC of the contrast group was higher than that of the control group (0.952 vs 0.902, respectively; P < 0.05). In addition, the average number of puncture needles in the contrast group was lower than that in the control group (2.58 ± 0.53 vs 2.90 ± 0.56, respectively; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

CEUS guidance can enhance the efficiency of puncture biopsy of peripheral pulmonary lesions, especially for lesions with a diameter ≥ 5 cm. Therefore, CEUS guidance has high clinical diagnostic value in puncture biopsy of peripheral focal lung lesions.

Conventional and Contrast-enhanced US of the Lung: From Performance to Diagnosis

In recent years, lung US has evolved from a marginal tool to an integral component of diagnostic chest imaging. Contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) can improve routine gray-scale imaging of the lung and chest, particularly in diagnosis of peripheral lung diseases (PLDs). Although an underused tool in many centers, and despite inherent limitations in evaluation of central lung disease caused by high acoustic impedance between air and soft tissues, lung CEUS has emerged as a valuable tool in diagnosis of PLDs. Owing to the dual arterial supply to the lungs via pulmonary and bronchial (systemic) arteries, different enhancement patterns can be observed at lung CEUS, thereby enabling accurate differential diagnoses in various PLDs. Lung CEUS also assists in identifying patients who may benefit from complementary diagnostic tests, including image-guided percutaneous biopsy. Moreover, lung CEUS-guided percutaneous biopsy has shown feasibility in accessible subpleural lesions, enabling higher histopathologic performance without significantly increasing either imaging time or expenses compared with conventional US. The authors discuss the technique of and basic normal and pathologic findings at conventional lung US, followed by a more detailed discussion of lung CEUS applications, emphasizing specific aspects of pulmonary physiology, basic concepts in lung US enhancement, and the most commonly encountered enhancement patterns of different PLDs. Finally, they discuss the benefits of lung CEUS in planning and guidance of US-guided lung biopsy. ©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

The Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Differential Diagnosis of Malignant and Benign Subpleural Lung Lesions

Background: The application of transthoracic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to the study of peripheral lung lesions is still a topic of debate. The main objective of this review was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS in the diagnosis of malignant subpleural pulmonary consolidations and, therefore, differentiate them from benign ones. Methods: Papers published before December 2023 were detected through a search of PubMed, Cochrane library, and Embase. The pooled specificity and sensitivity, summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were used. Results: CEUS is characterized by a pooled sensitivity of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97) and a pooled specificity of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90-0.95) in differentiating benign and malignant subpleural lung diseases; the AUC of SROC was 0.97. Homogeneous CE was characterized by a pooled sensitivity of 0.43 (95% CI: 0.40-0.45) and the pooled specificity of 0.49 (95% CI: 0.46-0.52). Non-homogeneous CE displayed a pooled sensitivity of 0.57 (95% CI: 0.55-0.60) and a pooled specificity of 0.51 (95% CI: 0.48-0.54). The lack of CE displayed a pooled sensitivity of 0.01 (95% CI: 0.00-0.06) and a pooled specificity of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.85). Marked CE displayed a pooled sensitivity of 0.41 (95% CI: 0.37-0.44) and a pooled specificity of 0.54 (95% CI: 0.50-0.58). Non-marked CE displayed a pooled sensitivity of 0.59 (95% CI: 0.56-0.63) and a pooled specificity of 0.46 (95% CI: 0.42-0.50). The early AT displayed a pooled sensitivity of 0.04 (95% CI: 0.02-0.08) and a pooled specificity of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77-0.87). The early wash out displayed a pooled sensitivity of 0.61 (95% CI: 0.48-0.72) and a pooled specificity of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.92-1.00). The delayed wash out displayed a pooled sensitivity of 0.15 (95% CI: 0.10-0.20) and a pooled specificity of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.62-0.75). Conclusions: CEUS is characterized by excellent diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of the malignancy of subpleural lung lesions. By separately analyzing the CEUS findings, the diagnostic accuracy values are considerably lower and not significant in some cases. The simultaneous evaluation of multiple CEUS features allows us to reach an excellent diagnostic accuracy. Non-homogeneous CE with early wash out are the most indicative features of malignancy of a lung lesion.

Ultrasound in the Study of Thoracic Diseases: Innovative Aspects

Thoracic ultrasound (TU) has rapidly gained popularity over the past 10 years. This is in part because ultrasound equipment is available in many settings, more training programmes are educating trainees in this technique, and ultrasound can be done rapidly without exposure to radiation. The aim of this review is to present the most interesting and innovative aspects of the use of TU in the study of thoracic diseases. In pleural diseases, TU has been a real revolution. It helps to differentiate between different types of pleural effusions, guides the performance of pleural biopsies when necessary and is more cost-effective under these conditions, and assists in the decision to remove thoracic drainage after talc pleurodesis. With the advent of COVID19, the use of TU has increased for the study of lung involvement. Nowadays it helps in the diagnosis of pneumonias, tumours and interstitial diseases, and its use is becoming more and more widespread in the Pneumology ward. In recent years, TU guided biopsies have been shown to be highly cost-effective, with other advantages such as the absence of radiation and the possibility of being performed at bedside. The use of contrast in ultrasound to increase the cost-effectiveness of these biopsies is very promising. In the study of the mediastinum and peripheral pulmonary nodules, the introduction of echobronchoscopy has brought about a radical change. It is a fully established technique in the study of lung cancer patients. The introduction of elastography may help to further improve its cost-effectiveness. In critically-ill patients, diaphragmatic ultrasound helps in the assessment of withdrawal of mechanical ventilation, and is now an indispensable tool in the management of these patients. In neuromuscular patients, ultrasound is a good predictor of impaired lung function. Currently, in Neuromuscular Disease Units, TU is an indispensable tool. Ultrasound study of the intercostal musculature is also effective in the study of respiratory function, and is widely used in Respiratory Rehabilitation. In Intermediate Care Units, thoracic ultrasound is indispensable for patient management. In these units there are ultrasound protocols for the management of patients with acute dyspnoea that have proven to be very effective.

Diagnostic performance and safety of percutaneous fine-needle aspiration immediately before microwave ablation for pulmonary ground-glass nodules

Background

This study sought to evaluate the safety and diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) immediately before microwave ablation (MWA) for pulmonary ground-glass nodules (GGNs).

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed the synchronous CT-guided biopsy and MWA data of 92 GGNs (male to female ratio 37:55; age 60.4±12.5 years; size 1.4±0.6 cm). FNA was performed in all patients, and sequential core-needle biopsy (CNB) was performed in 62 patients. The positive diagnosis rate was determined. The diagnostic yield was compared on the basis of the biopsy methods (FNA, CNB, or both), the nodule diameter (<1.5 and ≥1.5 cm), and the lesion component (pure GGN or part-solid GGN). The procedure-related complications were recorded.

Results

The technical success rate was 100%. The positive rates of FNA and CNB were 70.7% and 72.6% respectively, but did not differ significantly (P=0.8). Sequential FNA and CNB showed better diagnostic performance (88.7%) than did either alone (P=0.008 and P=0.023, respectively). The diagnostic yield of CNB for pure GGNs was significantly lower than that for part-solid GGNs (P=0.016). The diagnostic yield was lower for smaller nodules (78.3% vs. 87.5%; P=0.28), but the differences were not significant. Grade 1 pulmonary hemorrhages were observed in 10 (10.9%) sessions after FNA, including 8 cases of hemorrhage along the needle track and 2 cases of perilesional hemorrhage, but these hemorrhages did not hamper the accuracy of the antenna placement.

Conclusions

FNA immediately before MWA is a reliable technique for the diagnosis of GGNs that does not alter the accuracy of the antenna placement. Sequential FNA and CNB improves the diagnostic ability of GGNs compared to either method used alone.

Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsies (US-CNBs) in cervical lymphadenopathy in patients with suspected head and neck cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

Cervical lymphadenopathy can be benign or malignant. Its accurate diagnosis is necessary to determine appropriate treatment. Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsies (US-CNBs) are frequently used as a percutaneous sampling approach.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to identify the efficacy and safety of US-CNBs in 125 patients with cervical lymphadenopathy and clinically suspected head and neck cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic with limited surgical resources.

METHODS

US-CNBs of pathological lymph nodes were performed in 146 lymph nodes on 125 patients. Biopsies were performed ultrasound-guided with a reusable gun core biopsy system and a 10-cm-long 16-G needle. Standard of reference for the histological findings were panendoscopy, clinical and sonographic follow-up, surgical biopsy or a repeat US-CNB.

RESULTS

Adequate material for histologic diagnosis was obtained in 111 patients (89%), of these 83 patients (75%) were diagnosed as malignant, whereas benign lymphadenopathy accounted for 28 patients (25%). Therefore, US-CNB was able to identify malignant or benign lymphadenopathy with an overall accuracy of 88% and 90%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous US-CNB is a safe and effective alternative to surgical biopsy in the management of cervical lymphadenopathy in patients with clinically suspected head and neck cancer in a setting with limited resources.