A pilot study of highly accelerated 3D MRI in the head and neck position verification for MR-guided radiotherapy

Acquisition repeatability of MRI radiomics features in the head and neck: a dual-3D-sequence multi-scan study

Radiomics has increasingly been investigated as a potential biomarker in quantitative imaging to facilitate personalized diagnosis and treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC), a group of malignancies associated with high heterogeneity. However, the feature reliability of radiomics is a major obstacle to its broad validity and generality in application to the highly heterogeneous head and neck (HN) tissues. In particular, feature repeatability of radiomics in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition, which is considered a crucial confounding factor of radiomics feature reliability, is still sparsely investigated. This study prospectively investigated the acquisition repeatability of 93 MRI radiomics features in ten HN tissues of 15 healthy volunteers, aiming for potential magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) treatment of HNC. Each subject underwent four MRI acquisitions with MRgRT treatment position and immobilization using two pulse sequences of 3D T1-weighed turbo spin-echo and 3D T2-weighed turbo spin-echo on a 1.5 T MRI simulator. The repeatability of radiomics feature acquisition was evaluated in terms of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), whereas within-subject acquisition variability was evaluated in terms of the coefficient of variation (CV). The results showed that MRI radiomics features exhibited heterogeneous acquisition variability and uncertainty dependent on feature types, tissues, and pulse sequences. Only a small fraction of features showed excellent acquisition repeatability (ICC > 0.9) and low within-subject variability. Multiple MRI scans improved the accuracy and confidence of the identification of reliable features concerning MRI acquisition compared to simple test-retest repeated scans. This study contributes to the literature on the reliability of radiomics features with respect to MRI acquisition and the selection of reliable radiomics features for use in modeling in future HNC MRgRT applications.

A review of deep learning-based three-dimensional medical image registration methods

Medical image registration is a vital component of many medical procedures, such as image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), as it allows for more accurate dose-delivery and better management of side effects. Recently, the successful implementation of deep learning (DL) in various fields has prompted many research groups to apply DL to three-dimensional (3D) medical image registration. Several of these efforts have led to promising results. This review summarized the progress made in DL-based 3D image registration over the past 5 years and identify existing challenges and potential avenues for further research. The collected studies were statistically analyzed based on the region of interest (ROI), image modality, supervision method, and registration evaluation metrics. The studies were classified into three categories: deep iterative registration, supervised registration, and unsupervised registration. The studies are thoroughly reviewed and their unique contributions are highlighted. A summary is presented following a review of each category of study, discussing its advantages, challenges, and trends. Finally, the common challenges for all categories are discussed, and potential future research topics are identified.

Patient positioning and immobilization procedures for hybrid MR-Linac systems

Hybrid magnetic resonance (MR)-guided linear accelerators represent a new horizon in the field of radiation oncology. By harnessing the favorable combination of on-board MR-imaging with the possibility to daily recalculate the treatment plan based on real-time anatomy, the accuracy in target and organs-at-risk identification is expected to be improved, with the aim to provide the best tailored treatment. To date, two main MR-linac hybrid machines are available, Elekta Unity and Viewray MRIdian. Of note, compared to conventional linacs, these devices raise practical issues due to the positioning phase for the need to include the coil in the immobilization procedure and in order to perform the best reproducible positioning, also in light of the potentially longer treatment time. Given the relative novelty of this technology, there are few literature data regarding the procedures and the workflows for patient positioning and immobilization for MR-guided daily adaptive radiotherapy. In the present narrative review, we resume the currently available literature and provide an overview of the positioning and setup procedures for all the anatomical districts for hybrid MR-linac systems.

Longitudinal acquisition repeatability of MRI radiomics features: An ACR MRI phantom study on two MRI scanners using a 3D T1W TSE sequence

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to quantitatively assess the longitudinal acquisition repeatability of MRI radiomics features in a three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted (T1W) TSE sequence via a well-controlled prospective phantom study.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive daily datasets of an ACR-MRI phantom were acquired on two 1.5T MRI simulators using a 3D T1W TSE sequence. Images were blindly segmented by two observers. Post-acquisition processing was minimized but an intensity discretization (fixed bin size of 25). One hundred and one radiomics features (shape n = 12; first order n = 16; texture n = 73) were extracted. Longitudinal repeatability of each feature was evaluated by Pearson correlation and coefficient of variance (CV_68% ). Interobserver feature value agreement was also quantified using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. A most repeatable radiomics feature set on both scanners was determined by feature coefficient of variance (CV_68% <5%), ICC (>0.75), and the ratio of the interobserver difference to the interobserver mean δ<5%.

RESULTS

No trend of radiomics feature value changed with time. Longitudinal feature repeatability CV_68% ranged 0.01-38.60% (mean/median: 12.5%/9.9%), and 0.01-40.47%, (8.49%/7.34%) on the scanners A and B. Shape features exhibited significantly better repeatability than first-order and texture features (all P < 0.01). Significant longitudinal repeatability difference was observed in texture features (P < 0.001) between the two scanners, but not in shape and first-order features (P > 0.30). First-order and texture features had smaller interobserver-dependent variation than acquisition-dependent variation. They also showed good interobserver agreement on both scanners (A:ICC = 0.80 ± 0.23; B:ICC = 0.80 ± 0.22), independent of acquisition repeatability. The repeatable radiomics features in common on both scanners, including 12 shape features, 0 first-order features, and 3 texture features, were determined as the most repeatable MRI radiomics feature set.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomics features exhibited heterogeneous longitudinal repeatability, while the shape features were the most repeatable, in this phantom study with a 3D T1W TSE acquisition. The most repeatable radiomics feature set derived in this study should be helpful for the selection of reliable radiomics features in the future clinical use.