A systematic review of decision aids for gender affirming therapy

Evaluating quality, understandability, and actionability of YouTube content for gender-affirming surgery

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study is to evaluate YouTube content about metoidioplasty on completeness of perioperative information, actionability, understandability, degree of misinformation, quality, and presence of commercial bias.

METHODS

A YouTube search for "Metoidioplasty" was conducted and the first 100 video results were watched by five independent reviewers. Videos in English, <30 minutes in length were included and videos primarily showing surgical footage were excluded. Videos were evaluated between January 2022 and June 2022. Each video was evaluated for presenter demographics, channel/video statistics, and whether it covered topics including anatomy, treatment options, outcomes, procedure risks, and misinformation, and whether it had a clickbait title. Calculated scores for validated DISCERN and patient education materials assessment tool (PEMAT) metrics were the primary outcome variables used to quantify quality, actionability, and understandability. For PEMAT, a cutoff of 75% was used to differentiate between "poor" vs. "good/sufficient." Multivariate and univariate logistic regressions were performed to assess correlations among primary outcome variables and other variables.

RESULTS

Of the 79 videos analyzed, 24% (n=19) were of high quality; 99% (n=78) had poor understandability and 100% (n=79%) had poor actionability. Patients/consumers were the most common publisher type (n=71, 90%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates metoidioplasty content available on YouTube is not comprehensive and is of poor quality, and poor actionability and understandability, demonstrating a clear need for more relevant, accessible, comprehensible, and accurate content.

Patient education and surgical decision-making in genital gender-affirming surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

An update on the latest advances in surgical decision-making for genital gender-affirming surgery (GGAS), with an emphasis on patient education from three perspectives: surgeon-team perspectives, patient perspectives, and educational resources available to the public on social media.

RECENT FINDINGS

Transgender, nonbinary, and other culturally specific gender identities (TGNB) patients overwhelmingly desire an active role in the decision-making process. New developments in patient-engagement strategies help mitigate the harm of historical gatekeeping practices by centering the needs and experiences of TGNB patients to create a prioritized research agenda for GGAS effectiveness. Patient educational resources play an integral role in navigating the complexity of GGAS-surgical options, informing patients of the technical and logistical knowledge required for GGAS surgical decision-making. Peer support experiences are a critical facilitator for patient surgical decision-making, both for informed decision-making and for psychosocial support.

SUMMARY

Several developments have been made in examining shared-decision making, educational resources from the perspectives of both the surgical team and patients, and the role of social media in GGAS. Surgeons must continue to initiate robust conversations of patient goals, GGAS surgical options, the possible risk and benefit profiles of each option, and aftercare requirements, all while prioritizing patient-engagement strategies.

Physicians' and Patients' Expectations From Digital Agents for Consultations: Interview Study Among Physicians and Patients

BACKGROUND

Physicians are currently overwhelmed by administrative tasks and spend very little time in consultations with patients, which hampers health literacy, shared decision-making, and treatment adherence.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to examine whether digital agents constructed using fast-evolving generative artificial intelligence, such as ChatGPT, have the potential to improve consultations, adherence to treatment, and health literacy. We interviewed patients and physicians to obtain their opinions about 3 digital agents-a silent digital expert, a communicative digital expert, and a digital companion (DC).

METHODS

We conducted in-depth interviews with 25 patients and 22 physicians from a purposeful sample, with the patients having a wide age range and coming from different educational backgrounds and the physicians having different medical specialties. Transcripts of the interviews were deductively coded using MAXQDA (VERBI Software GmbH) and then summarized according to code and interview before being clustered for interpretation.

RESULTS

Statements from patients and physicians were categorized according to three consultation phases: (1) silent and communicative digital experts that are part of the consultation, (2) digital experts that hand over to a DC, and (3) DCs that support patients in the period between consultations. Overall, patients and physicians were open to these forms of digital support but had reservations about all 3 agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultimately, we derived 9 requirements for designing digital agents to support consultations, treatment adherence, and health literacy based on the literature and our qualitative findings.

Surgical outcomes, motivations, sexuality, and urinary function of metoidioplasty with semi-rigid prosthesis

Background

Preliminary results of a specific semi-rigid prosthesis for metoidioplasty (ZSI® 100D4; Zephyr Surgical Implants, Geneva) have been reported, suggesting a safe procedure that may enhance the metoidioplasty outcomes by stiffening and increasing protrusion of the constructed neo-phallus.

Aim

The objective of the present study was to report the updated surgical results of metoidioplasty with implantation of the ZSI®100D4, along with a comprehensive evaluation of the outcomes including, motivations, sexuality, and urinary function.

Methods

All individuals who underwent a metoidioplasty with implantation of the ZSI®100D4 between August 2017 and January 2021 with at least 1 year of follow-up were included and their data retrospectively collected. They were contacted by telephone between November 2020 and May 2022 and invited to answer a questionnaire exploring motivations, satisfaction with genitals and sexual life, as well as urinary and sexual function.

Results

Twenty-one individuals were included and followed-up during a median [IQR] period of 19.5 months [12.8-24.2]. Most individuals (n = 13; 62.0%) had a post-operative complication, the most frequent was wound dehiscence (n = 6; 28.6%). Three urinary fistula (14.3%) were reported, all managed conservatively (Clavien-Dindo grade 2) with a prolonged urinary diversion. Among the 18 individuals who answered the questionnaire, 16 (88.9%) were sexually active, and 11 (61.1%) were engaged in a sexual relationship. The total median [IQR] self-esteem and relationship questionnaire score was 92 [91-97]. The reported urinary symptoms of delay, intermittency, lagging drops and spraying were mostly never or rarely reported. The satisfaction regarding overall genital aspect was highly favorable as 15 (83.3%) individuals reporting being very satisfied or satisfied, although 5 (27.8%) reported being dissatisfied with the size of their genitals.

Conclusion

Implantation of a semi-rigid prosthesis in a metoidioplasty seems a safe procedure, with no reported complications related to the prosthesis. Overall, satisfaction regarding genitals, sexual and urinary function are favorable.

Decision making in metoidioplasty and phalloplasty gender-affirming surgery: a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND

Gender-affirming surgical procedures, such as metoidioplasty and phalloplasty for those assigned female at birth, are complex and multistaged and involve risks. Individuals considering these procedures experience greater uncertainty or decisional conflict, compounded by difficulty finding trustworthy information.

AIM

(1) To explore the factors contributing to decisional uncertainty and the needs of individuals considering metoidioplasty and phalloplasty gender-affirming surgery (MaPGAS) and (2) to inform development of a patient-centered decision aid.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was based on mixed methods. Adult transgender men and nonbinary individuals assigned female at birth at various stages of MaPGAS decision making were recruited from 2 study sites in the United States to participate in semistructured interviews and an online gender health survey, which included measures of gender congruence, decisional conflict, urinary health, and quality of life. Trained qualitative researchers conducted all interviews with questions to explore constructs from the Ottawa decision support framework.

OUTCOMES

Outcomes included goals and priorities for MaPGAS, expectations, knowledge, and decisional needs, as well as variations in decisional conflict by surgical preference, surgical status, and sociodemographic variables.

RESULTS

We interviewed 26 participants and collected survey data from 39 (24 interviewees, 92%) at various stages of MaPGAS decision making. In surveys and interviews, affirmation of gender identity, standing to urinate, sensation, and the ability to "pass" as male emerged as highly important factors for deciding to undergo MaPGAS. A third of survey respondents reported decisional conflict. Triangulation of data from all sources revealed that conflict emerged most when trying to balance the strong desire to resolve gender dysphoria through surgical transition against the risks and unknowns in urinary and sexual function, appearance, and preservation of sensation post-MaPGAS. Insurance coverage, age, access to surgeons, and health concerns further influenced surgery preferences and timing.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The findings add to the understanding of decisional needs and priorities of those considering MaPGAS while revealing new complexities among knowledge, personal factors, and decisional uncertainty.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

This mixed methods study was codeveloped by members of the transgender and nonbinary community and yielded important guidance for providers and individuals considering MaPGAS. The results provide rich qualitative insights for MaPGAS decision making in US contexts. Limitations include low diversity and sample size; both are being addressed in work underway.

CONCLUSIONS

This study increases understanding of the factors important to MaPGAS decision making, and results are being used to guide development of a patient-centered surgical decision aid and informed survey revision for national distribution.

Desired decision-making role and treatment satisfaction among trans people during medical transition: results from the ENIGI follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Shared decision making (SDM) is particularly important in transition-related medical interventions (TRMIs) given the nature of treatment and history of gatekeeping in transgender health care. Yet few studies have investigated trans people's desired decision-making role within TRMI and factors that influence these desires.

AIMS

The study investigated trans people's desired level of decision making during medical transition as well as possible sociodemographic predictors and correlations between decision-making desires and satisfaction with treatment.

METHODS

Data were collected from a clinical sample from 3 trans health care centers, as part of the larger ENIGI study. The data consisted of 568 trans individuals (60.2% assigned male at birth) 20 to 82 years of age (mean age = 38.58 years) who took part in the study 4 to 6 years after initial clinical contact. Binary logistic regressions were conducted to determine whether independent variables predicted group membership in decision-making role subgroups while a Spearman rank-order correlation was conducted to determine the relationship between desired decision-making involvement and satisfaction with care.

OUTCOMES

Main measures were desired decision-making role, satisfaction with treatment, age, education level, country of residence, treatment status, individual treatment progress score (ITPS), gender identity, and sex assigned at birth.

RESULTS

The vast majority of participants wanted to make medical decisions themselves. Age, education level, country of residence, treatment status, gender identity, and sex assigned at birth showed no significant effects in desired level of decision making, while the ITPS neared significance. Satisfaction with treatment was overall very high. For participants assigned male at birth, desire for a more active role in decision making was negatively correlated with satisfaction of labia surgery.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

A desired decision-making role cannot be predicted based on the trans person's sociodemographic characteristics. More involvement from health professionals addressing medical information and education obligations may be needed when offering surgical construction of labia to individuals assigned male at birth.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

This study builds on the few existing analyses of desired levels of decision-making role among trans people during transition. It is the first to investigate the role of education level and treatment status/ITPS on the desire of decision-making role. Gender identity and influence of nonbinary identity were not investigated for treatment satisfaction as these items were presented based on sex assigned at birth.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights that trans people in 3 European trans health care centers during medical transition desire a more active role in decision making. Satisfaction with treatment received was overall very high.