Application of ultra pulse CO2 lattice laser in the treatment of female urinary incontinence

Effect evaluation and influencing factor analysis of vaginal carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence and analyze the influencing factors. A total of 46 patients with stress urinary incontinence treated in the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University from March 2021 to August 2022 were included through strict inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria. All patients were treated with transvaginal carbon dioxide laser therapy, and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) was used to evaluate patients' subjective satisfaction after treatment. The efficacy was evaluated by patient's subjective assessment of leakage, IngelmanSundberg scale, 1-h urine pad test, and international consultation on incontinence questionnaire short form (ICI-Q-SF) before and after treatment, and the adverse reactions after treatment were recorded. The treatment effect was divided into "significant effect group" and "no significant effect group" by subjective satisfaction and post-treatment-related scale evaluation. After laser treatment, patients' subjective symptom improved, the volume of 1-h urine pad test was reduced, and the ICI-Q-SF score was decreased, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in IngelmanSundberg scale before and after treatment (P = 1.00). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that pad test volume was significantly correlated with treatment effect (P = 0.007). Transvaginal carbon dioxide laser is a safe and effective method for the treatment of mild to moderate stress urinary incontinence in females. The less severe the urinary leakage, the better the treatment effect.

CO2 laser therapy for management of stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Carbon dioxide (CO2) laser therapy is an emerging treatment for women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Objectives

To examine the efficacy of CO2 laser therapy for management of SUI-related symptoms in women.

Design

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies.

Data sources and methods

Four databases were screened until January 2023. All efficacy continuous endpoints were assessed via subtraction of the posttreatment from pretreatment values. The data were summarized as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model.

Results

A total of 15 studies with 700 patients were analyzed. CO2 laser therapy significantly decreased the 1-h pad weights at 3 months [n = 5 studies, MD = -3.656 g, 95% CI (-5.198, -2.113), p < 0.001], 6 months [n = 6 studies, MD = -6.583 g, 95% CI (-11.158, -2.008), p = 0.005], and 12 months [n = 6 studies, MD = -3.726 g, 95% CI (-6.347, -1.106), p = 0.005]. Moreover, CO2 laser therapy significantly decreased the International Consultation of Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form Scores at 3 months [n = 10 studies, MD = -4.805, 95% CI (-5.985, -3.626), p < 0.001] and 12-months [n = 6 studies, MD = -3.726, 95% CI (-6.347, -1.106), p = 0.005]. Additionally, CO2 laser therapy significantly decreased the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire scores at 6 months [n = 2 studies, MD = -11.268, 95% CI (-18.671, -3.865), p = 0.002] and 12 months [n = 2 studies, MD = -10.624, 95% CI (-18.145, -3.103), p = 0.006]. Besides, CO2 laser therapy significantly decreased the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 scores at 3 months [n = 2 studies, MD = -21.997, 95% CI (-32.294, -11.699), p < 0.001], but not at 6 months [n = 3 studies, MD = -3.034, 95% CI (-7.357, 1.259), p = 0.169]. Lastly, CO2 laser therapy significantly increased the Vaginal Health Index Score at 6 months [n = 2 studies, MD = 2.826, 95% CI (0.013, 5.638), p = 0.047] and 12 months [MD = 1.553, 95% CI (0.173, 2.934), p = 0.027].

Conclusion

CO2 laser therapy improved the SUI-related symptoms in women. To obtain solid conclusions, future studies should be well-designed with standardized settings, consistent therapeutic protocols, and long-term follow-up periods.

The evidence behind the use of LASER for genitourinary syndrome of menopause, vulvovaginal atrophy, urinary incontinence and lichen sclerosus: A state-of-the-art review

In recent years, LASER has been introduced as a minimally invasive treatment for a broad range of vaginal and vulvar symptoms and diseases. However, the efficacy and safety of vaginal and vulvar LASER has continuously been questioned. The aim of this study is to create an overview of the current literature and discuss the controversies within the use of LASER for genitourinary syndrome of menopause, vulvovaginal atrophy, urinary incontinence and lichen sclerosus. A search string was built in PubMed. The search was commenced on August 25, 2021 and closed on October 27, 2021. Two authors screened the studies in Covidence for inclusion according to the eligibility criteria in the protocol. The data were extracted from the studies and are reported in both text and tables. This review included 114 papers, of which 15 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The effect of LASER as a vaginal treatment was investigated for genitourinary syndrome of menopause in 36 studies (six RCTs), vulvovaginal atrophy in 34 studies (four RCTs) and urinary incontinence in 30 studies (two RCTs). Ten studies (three RCTs) investigated the effect of vulvar treatment for lichen sclerosus. Half of the included RCTs, irrespective of indication, did not find a significant difference in improvement in women treated with vaginal CO₂ or Er:YAG LASER compared with their respective controls. However, most non-comparative studies reported significant improvement after exposure to vaginal or vulvar LASER across all indications. Included studies generally had a short follow-up period and only a single RCT followed their participants for more than 6 months post treatment. Adverse events were reported as mild and transient and 99 studies including 51 094 patients provided information of no serious adverse events. In conclusion, this review found that the effect of vaginal and vulvar LASER decreases with higher study quality where potential biases have been eliminated. We therefore stress that all patients who are treated with vaginal or vulvar LASER should be carefully monitored and that LASER for those indications as a treatment should be kept on a research level until further high-quality evidence is available.