Is there a place for surgical treatment of premature ejaculation?

Hyaluronic acid and urology: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The use of hyaluronic acid as a nonsurgical treatment for various conditions within urology has been of great interest in recent literature.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we aimed to provide an updated review and analysis of the current state of hyaluronic acid use in urology, characterize its adverse effects, and briefly discuss future directions of research for hyaluronic acid in urology.

METHODS

PubMed searches were run utilizing multiple terms, including "hyaluronic acid," "penile," "augmentation," "Peyronie disease," "premature ejaculation," and "cosmetic urology," among other related iterations. Relevant data extracted included International Index of Erectile Function score, intravaginal ejaculatory latency, glans circumference, penile girth, and plaque size. We also included studies which reported on complications of hyaluronic acid injections. Aggregated analysis was performed on studies with complete pre and post injection data at time closest to 6 months postinjection.

RESULTS

A total of 33 studies met our inclusion criteria. Studies had marked heterogeneity in design, but most reported positive results. A total of 16 studies were included in our analysis. Intravaginal ejaculatory latency, penile girth, glans circumference, and International Index of Erectile Function were all increased on a fixed-effects model. Reduction in plaque size was not significant (P = .069). Complications were rare.

CONCLUSION

Literature on hyaluronic acid for urologic issues demonstrates promising results; however, the quality of studies was variable. Our analysis of these studies largely corroborates these findings; however, the results are limited by the data available. Hyaluronic acid may be promising, but we highly implore standardization of study regimens in randomized controlled trials.

The role of surgical therapy in the management of premature ejaculation: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Premature ejaculation (PE) is a common sexual disorder among male adults and negatively impacts a man's sexual life. Currently, the mainstay treatment of PE is still medical therapy which has drawbacks among patients as a consequence of side effects. Despite the new definitions, the evolution of medical therapy, and the consensus for the management of PE, it remains challenging to treat for many clinicians especially when medical treatment fails. However, the International Society for Sexual Medicine (ISSM) and the American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines ignored surgical therapy due to conflicting medical reports and doubts about the safety of surgical management. This article discusses the surgical management of PE based on recent guidelines, reviews, and evolving techniques.

Methods

We reviewed the literature using PubMed and searched for the following keywords: premature ejaculation, selective dorsal neurectomy, hyaluronic acid, dorsal nerve neuromodulation, cryo-ablation of the dorsal nerve and inner condom technique until May 2023. Seventeen studies were found.

Key Content and Findings

Even though the widespread use of many surgical modalities in Asia such as glans penis augmentation (GPA) using hyaluronic acid (HA) selective dorsal neurectomy (SDN), cryo-ablation of the dorsal nerve, neuromodulation of the dorsal nerve (NMDN), and circumcision are still considered as controversial for the guidelines.

Conclusions

The mainstay treatment of PE is still pharmaceutical. However, the current body of evidence on surgical treatments for PE is limited. Men considering surgical therapy for PE should be counseled well for the risks and benefits as there may be chronic disabilities. Further, well-designed trials are needed to establish safety and efficacy for the surgical treatment.

Effect of Selective Dorsal Neurectomy on Erectile Function in Rats

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the effect of penile selective dorsal neurectomy (SDN) on erectile function in rats.

METHODS

Twelve adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (15 weeks old) were divided into three groups (n=4 per group): in control group, rats received no treatment; in sham group, rats underwent a sham operation; in SDN group, rats underwent SDN with half of the dorsal penile nerve severed. The mating test was performed, and the intracavernous pressure (ICP) assessed six weeks after the surgical treatment.

RESULTS

At postoperative six weeks, the mating test revealed no significant difference in mounting latency and mounting frequency among the three groups (P>0.05), while the ejaculation latency (EL) was significantly longer and ejaculation frequency (EF) lower in the SDN group than in the control and sham groups (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in preoperative and postoperative ICP and ICP/mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) among the three groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

SDN does not adversely affect the erectile function and sexual desire of rats, and at the same time it can reduce EL and EF, providing an application basis for SDN in the clinical treatment of premature ejaculation.

A Conceptual Approach to Understanding and Managing Men's Orgasmic Difficulties

Premature ejaculation (PE) and delayed/inhibited ejaculation (DE) are 2 ejaculatory problems that may negatively affect the sexual relationship and cause distress. Although no specific cause explains these problems when they have been lifelong conditions, understanding both biological and psychological factors may be relevant to treatment choices, with options ranging from pharmacologic to psychobehavioral. Integrating treatment modalities may lead to better outcomes but may also require greater psychological and resource investment from the patient or couple.

An update on the treatment of premature ejaculation: A systematic review

To analyse the current therapeutic options for patients with premature ejaculation (PE) and highlight their mechanism(s) of action, effectiveness, advantages and limitations. A literature search was conducted using the PubMed database searching for articles exploring different PE treatment modalities. A Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach was used to report the results of the literature search. A total of 149 articles were included in this review. The currently available treatment methods for PE include behavioural therapy, local anaesthetics, tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and selective phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Most PE treatments are either experimental or used off-label. New treatments are certainly warranted to overcome this exasperating sexual dysfunction.

Abbreviations: AIPE: Arabic Index of Premature Ejaculation; CNS: central nervous system; CYP: cytochrome P450; ED: erectile dysfunction; FDA: United States Food and Drug Administration; H1: histamine receptors; 5-HT: 5-hydroxytryptamine; IELT: The intravaginal ejaculation latency time; IPE: Index of Premature Ejaculation; M1: muscarinic receptors; OCD: obsessive–compulsive disorder; PDE5: phosphodiesterase type 5; PE: premature ejaculation; PEP: Premature Ejaculation Profile; PRO: patient-reported outcome; RCT: randomised controlled trial; SS: Severance Secret (cream); SSRIs: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; TCAs: tricyclic antidepressants

Elevated free testosterone levels and reduced very low-density lipoprotein levels in men with lifelong premature ejaculation: a preliminary study

Objective

To investigate sex hormone and blood lipid levels in patients with lifelong premature ejaculation (LPE) in China.

Methods

Sex hormone and blood lipid levels were measured in 156 patients with LPE and 76 healthy controls. The Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT) and Chinese Index of Sexual Function for Premature Ejaculation-5 Questionnaires (CIPE-5) were applied to diagnose and grade LPE.

Results

PEDT and CIPE-5 scores were significantly altered in the LPE group compared with the control group. Free testosterone levels were significantly higher in the LPE group than in the control group. Free testosterone levels were also significantly higher in the mild, moderate, and severe LPE subgroups than in the control group. Total testosterone and prolactin levels tended to be lower in the control group than in the LPE group. Very low-density lipoprotein levels were significantly lower in the LPE group and LPE subgroups than in the control group. Triglyceride levels were highest in controls and decreased with progression of LPE.

Conclusions

Patients with LPE have higher free testosterone levels and lower very low-density lipoprotein levels than controls. These findings indicate that these factors might be indices for LPE. However, the reasons for these phenomena need to be further investigated.