The drug treatment of premature ejaculation

Understanding and treating ejaculatory dysfunction in men with diabetes mellitus

Diabetes mellitus is a rapidly rising metabolic disorder with important systemic complications. Global figures have demonstrated the prevalence of diabetes mellitus has almost quadrupled from 108 million in 1980 to 422 million in 2014, with a current prevalence of over 525 million. Of the male sexual dysfunction resulting from diabetes mellitus, significant focus is afforded to erectile dysfunction. Nevertheless, ejaculatory dysfunction constitutes important sexual sequelae in diabetic men, with up to 35%-50% of men with diabetes mellitus suffering from ejaculatory dysfunction. Despite this, aspects of its pathophysiology and treatment are less well understood than erectile dysfunction. The main disorders of ejaculation include premature ejaculation, delayed ejaculation, anejaculation and retrograde ejaculation. Although ejaculatory dysfunction in diabetes mellitus can have complex multifactorial aetiology, understanding its pathophysiological mechanisms has facilitated the development of therapies in the management of ejaculatory dysfunction. Most of our understanding of its pathophysiology is derived from diabetic animal models; however, observational studies in humans have also provided useful information in elucidating important associative factors potentially contributing to ejaculatory dysfunction in diabetic men. These have provided the potential for more tailored treatment regimens in patients depending on the ejaculatory disorder, other co-existing sequelae of diabetes mellitus, specific metabolic factors as well as the need for fertility treatment. However, evidence for treatment of ejaculatory dysfunction, especially delayed ejaculation and retrograde ejaculation, is based on low-level evidence comprising small sample-size series and retrospective or cross-sectional studies. Whilst promising findings from large randomised controlled trials have provided strong evidence for the licensed treatment of premature ejaculation, similar robust studies are needed to accurately elucidate factors predicting ejaculatory dysfunction in diabetes mellitus, as well as for the development of pharmacotherapies for delayed ejaculation and retrograde ejaculation. Similarly, more contemporary robust data are required for fertility outcomes in these patients, including methods of sperm retrieval and assisted reproductive techniques in retrograde ejaculation.

The Influence of Tramadol on Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time and Sexual Satisfaction Score in Treating Patients With Premature Ejaculation: A Network Meta-Analysis

This network meta-analysis aimed at assessing the influence of tramadol on the intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) and sexual satisfaction score (SSS) in treating patients with premature ejaculation (PE). The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases (until July 2021), and original references of the included articles was systematically retrieved. The PRISMA checklist was followed. Finally, 14 articles including 1971 patients were included in this analysis. The results indicated that patients who were treated with tramadol (50 mg, 62 mg, 89 mg, and 100 mg) were superior to those treated with placebo in terms of IELT (p = .003, p < .00001, p < .00001, and p < .00001, respectively), but 25 mg tramadol did not show a significant advantage (p = .06). Patients who were treated with tramadol (50 mg and 100 mg) had a better efficacy than who were treated with 25 mg tramadol in the IELT (p < .00001 and p < .00001), but the effect of 50 mg tramadol and 100 mg tramadol were not significantly different (p = .17). The tramadol group had the better effect than the placebo group in the SSS (p < .0001). And 50 mg tramadol showed a significant improvement compared with 20 mg paroxetine, as assessed by the IELT (p = .03) and SSS (p = .03). Safety assessments including adverse events suggested that tramadol was well tolerated. Tramadol showed a better improvement of IELT and SSS than placebo or paroxetine, and 50 mg tramadol may be a more reasonable therapeutic dose for patients with PE.

Safety and efficacy of "on-demand" tramadol in patients with premature ejaculation: an updated meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Tramadol has been used for the treatment of premature ejaculation, however, the studies published for the same are not well designed. The primary objective of this study was to explore the literature pertaining to the use of tramadol in patients with PE to determine its safety and efficacy in this population. Materials ande methods: Systematic literature search of various electronic databases was conducted to include all the randomized studies and quasi-randomized studies. Standard PRISMA (Preferred reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis) guidelines were pursued for this review and study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019123381).

RESULTS

Out of 9 studies included in this review, 5 were randomized controlled trials, and rests of the 4 studies were quasi-randomized studies. Tramadol resulted in significantly higher improvement of IELT with the mean difference (MD) of 139.6 seconds and confidence interval (CI) 106.5-172.6 seconds with a p-value of p < 0.00001. All dosages except 25mg fared well as compared to placebo. Tramadol fared better than placebo at 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after initiation of therapy as compared to the placebo. Tramadol group had reported a significantly higher number of adverse events with treatment as compared to placebo but none of them were serious.

CONCLUSION

Tramadol appears to be an effective drug for the management of PE with a low propensity for serious adverse events. However, evidence obtained from this study is of low to moderate quality. Furthermore, effective dose and duration of therapy remain elusive.

Relative frequency of drug-induced sleep disorders for 32 antidepressants in a large set of Internet user reviews

STUDY OBJECTIVES

It is known that antidepressant drugs can induce sleep disorders in patients, but little data exist about high or low-risk molecules. The aim was to study the frequency of antidepressant drugs-induced sleep disorders (DISD) by molecule.

METHODS

77,391 patient comments for 32 antidepressant drugs were collected from drug review websites and screened for DISD. Association between drugs and nightmare disorder, restless legs syndrome, sleep paralysis, sleep terrors, sleep-related hallucinations or sleep walking was expressed as relative proportion [proportional reporting ratio (PRR)]. A detailed analysis of the dreams content was also carried out.

RESULTS

Amitriptyline, doxepin, fluvoxamine, mirtazapine, nortriptyline, trazodone, venlafaxine and vilazodone were associated with a greater frequency of DISD compared to other antidepressants. Vilazodone heavily increased the probability of developing 5 of the 6 studied DISD (PRR 3.3 to 19.3) and mirtazapine increased the probability for developing 4 DISD (PRR 2.4 to 6.4). Bupropion and citalopram were associated with lower probabilities for 5 DISD (PRR 0.2 to 0.7). Sentiment analysis showed that patients described disturbing dreams for vilazodone or mirtazapine and strange but less negative dreams for bupropion, citalopram or duloxetine.

CONCLUSIONS

Relative frequencies of sleep disorders were obtained for a vast panel of antidepressant drugs through an original analysis of user's drug reviews on drug rating websites. Our results could guide clinicians in appropriate choice of antidepressant drug for high DISD-risk patients in need of such treatment. These results may however be cautiously taken, considering the uncertain reliability and generalisability of web-based data.

Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors for Premature Ejaculation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Placebo-Controlled Trials

The purpose of this analysis is to assess the efficacy and safety of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) for the treatment of premature ejaculation (PE). A comprehensive search was performed to ascertain from trials about PDE5Is for the treatment of PE and compare the results, including intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IVELT), score of sexual satisfaction scale, and side effects, between the group treated with PDE5Is and that treated with placebo. Seven studies involving a total of 471 patients were included in this meta-analysis. This analysis showed that patients who were treated with PDE5Is had significantly increased IVELT (mean difference [MD] 2.60; 95% CI [1.85, 3.36]; p < .00001) and score of sexual satisfaction scale (MD 2.04; 95% CI [0.78, 3.30]; p = .002) compared with the group on placebo. More patients had side effects while taking PDE5Is, such as headache, dizziness, flushing, and nasal congestion. PDE5Is were significantly more effective than placebo in the treatment of PE. Side effects were more common among patients who were treated with PDE5Is.

Which of available selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) is more effective in treatment of premature ejaculation? A randomized clinical trial

Purpose:

To compare the efficacy and safety of available selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in order to find the most effective drug with the least number of side effects in treatment of premature ejaculation (PE).

Materials and Methods:

This study was a randomized clinical trial. Four hundred and eighty patients with PE in the 4 groups referred to Imam Reza hospital Tehran, Iran from July 2018 to February 2019 were enrolled in the study. The patients received sertraline 50mg, fluoxetine 20mg, paroxetine 20mg and citalopram 20mg, every 12 hours daily. The intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) before treatment, fourth and eighth weeks after treatment was recorded by the patient's wife with a stopwatch.

Results:

Mean IELT before, 4 and 8 weeks after treatment in four groups were: sertraline 69.4±54.3, 353.5±190.4, 376.3±143.5; fluoxetine 75.5±64.3, 255.4±168.2, 314.8±190.4; paroxetine 71.5±69.1, 320.7±198.3, 379.9±154.3; citalopram 90.39±79.3, 279.9±192.1, 282.5±171.1 seconds, respectively. The ejaculation time significantly increased in all groups (p <0.05), but there was no significant difference between the groups (P=0.75). Also, there was no significant difference in drugs side effects between groups (p >0.05). The most common side effects were drowsiness and dyspepsia, which were not severe enough to cause discontinuation of the drug.

Conclusions:

All available SSRIs were effective and usually had no serious complications. In patients who did not respond to any of these drugs, other SSRI drugs could be used as a salvage therapy.

Comparative study of on-demand and daily use of sertraline in treatment of premature ejaculation: A randomized clinical trial

Objective

The intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) may increase less in on-demand compared to daily intake, but may fulfill a suitable treatment for specific patients. We decided to compare the efficacy and safety of on-demand and daily use of sertraline in order to find the most effective and least complicated method in treatment of premature ejaculation (PE).

Methods

This study was parallel or concurrent control randomized clinical trial. Two hundred and forty patients with PE diagnosed by urologist in the two groups of 120 from July 2017 to February 2019 enrolled in the study. In the first group, it is prescribed 50 mg sertraline each 12 h daily and the second group received 50 mg 4 h before coitus for 4 and 8 weeks. The IELT before treatment and during all coitus after treatment were recorded by the patient's wife with a stopwatch.

Results

Mean IELT before, 4 and 8 weeks after treatment in two groups were: On-demand group 101.62±65.44 s, 208.75±128.02 s and 265.87±145.70 s; daily use group 102.50±81.22 s, 276.87±181.08 s and 353.75±176.45 s, respectively. The ejaculation time increased significantly in both groups (p<0.05). However, increase in ejaculation time in daily use group was significantly higher than the on-demand group in 4 weeks (p=0.036), especially in 8 weeks (p=0.009). The percent of side effects in daily use group (26.7%) was higher than on-demand group (20%) (p<0.05). Drowsiness, diarrhea and vertigo were significantly higher in the daily use than on-demand (p<0.05).

Conclusions

On-demand and daily use of sertraline are effective and usually have no serious complications, but the on-demand method is considerably more tolerable. In patients who did not tolerate to daily use of this drug, on-demand could be used as a salvage therapy.

[Andrology - Whom and how are patients being referred?]

INTRODUCTION

Andrology focuses in male sexual and fertility diseases. Its referral should be thoughtful and tailored in order to select the correct cases.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this work was to evaluate the referral to our department and improvement points.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of the Andrology consults between January 2014 and December 2015.

RESULTS

We evaluated 96 of the 102 consults performed. About 60% of patients were referred with erectile dysfunction complaints, 15% with penile curvature and 8% with ejaculatory dysfunction. About 27% had previously tried phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, and 40% lacked recent metabolic workup.

DISCUSSION

The high prevalence of sexual complaints coupled with a high number of naïve patients could be due to difficulties by the referral doctors when analyzing and characterizing male sexual dysfunction according to the current sexual response cycle model. The lack of patient categorization accordingly to Princeton criteria (III) shows the difficulties found when selecting patients to start the first line of treatment for erectile dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

Sexual dysfunction are highly prevalent in the general population. Healthcare providers should improve diagnostic and treatment skills in this field of Urology.

Surgical treatment for primary premature ejaculation with an inner condom technique

To explore a novel surgical treatment for primary premature ejaculation using an inner condom technique.A total of 20 males with premature ejaculation, who admitted our andrology clinic from June 2016 to July 2017, were enrolled. By surgery, an inner condom made of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) was transferred to the subcutaneous pocket of the penis. The prolongation of intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) after the surgery was examined. The perioperative complications were also studied.The surgical intervention significantly increased the average IELT in patients, from 0.67 to 2.37 min (P = .009). No serious perioperative complications and adverse psychosexual effects were seen. Patients could resume sexual activity 6 weeks after the surgery.The novel inner condom using ADM is an effective and safe surgical treatment for males with premature ejaculation. The efficacy of this new treatment modality warrants further investigation in independent cohorts.

Acellular dermal matrix in premature ejaculation: A preliminary study

BACKGROUND

To investigate the efficacy of acellular dermal matrix in penis augmentation (ADMPA) for premature ejaculation (PE).

METHODS

A total of 39 patients treated with ADM in penis augmentation from June 2014 to December 2017 were evaluated. Detailed evaluations on PE were conducted before operation and at the 6-month and 2-year follow-up visits after operation. Self-estimated intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) and 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) were used to measure the ejaculation and the erectile function for all subjects.

RESULTS

Compared to the baseline data, the IELT and IIEF-5 scores were increased, and PE was relieved at 6 months and 2 years after operation. No major complications occurred in the series. Minor complications were resolved with conservative treatment within 3 weeks. The psychosexual impact of the operation was beneficial in the majority of cases.

CONCLUSION

Our survey systematically evaluated the effects of ADMPA for PE. ADMPA might be an optional surgical method in patients with PE, especially for those who seek penile augmentation. However, given the small amount of cases involved in this study, further studies on the effect of ADMPA for PE were still needed.

Pharmacological interventions for premature ejaculation: a mixed-treatment comparison network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Premature ejaculation (PE) is the most common sexual dysfunction in men. The present study is a network meta-analysis of drugs used for treating PE. Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing medical interventions with either placebo or with other active drugs in patients with PE. Inverse variance heterogeneity model was used for mixed-treatment comparisons. Intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) and adverse events were the main outcome measures. A total of 44 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Dapoxetine 30 and 60 mg, tadalafil, sildenafil, paroxetine with sildenafil, topical lidocaine, dapoxetine 30 mg with mirodenafil, vardenafil, fluoxetine, and tadalafil, pindolol with paroxetine, tramadol, topical lidocaine with tadalafil, paroxetine with tadalafil, and topical eutectic mixture of local anesthetics were associated with a significant increase in IELT. Similarly, dapoxetine 60 mg, venlafaxine, fluoxetine, tramadol at 25, 50, and 100 mg, and combined fluoxetine and tadalafil were associated with an increased risk of adverse events. Dapoxetine 30 mg has a high likelihood of being the "best" in the interventional pool. Dapoxetine at 30 mg could be used as the first-line agent in the management of PE.

Silodosin versus naftopidil in the treatment of premature ejaculation: A prospective multicenter trial

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of two α1-adrenoceptor antagonists with different affinities for α1-adrenoceptor subtypes, silodosin and naftopidil, in the treatment of premature ejaculation.

METHODS

This was a prospective, open-label, multicenter trial. A total of 26 patients with untreated acquired premature ejaculation were enrolled. Premature ejaculation was defined based on the International Society for Sexual Medicine recommendation. Patients self-administered on demand silodosin 4 mg or naftopidil 25 mg 1 h before intercourse, alternating drugs at least three times each. Clinical global impression change for premature ejaculation, premature ejaculation profile, and intravaginal ejaculation latency time were evaluated at baseline and during treatment.

RESULTS

Due to clinical global impression change, 24 patients (92%) and 12 patients (46%) reported improvement in their own premature ejaculation problems under silodosin and nafitopidil administration, respectively. Silodosin treatment produced a significantly higher improvement rate compared with naftopidil (P = 0.0002). Objectively, silodosin significantly prolonged intravaginal ejaculation latency time compared with baseline and naftopidil (P < 0.01). Mean intravaginal ejaculation latency times were 1.9, 4.1, and 7.6 min at baseline, control and with silodosin, respectively. The rate of reduced semen volume during silodosin treatment was higher than during naftopidil treatment. There were no adverse systemic effects in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Silodosin, a highly selective α1A-adrenoceptor antagonist, produces greater improvements in premature ejaculation profiles and related symptoms along with intravaginal ejaculation latency time in acquired premature ejaculation patients with or without erectile dysfunction. This result supports the clinical use of silodosin as an alternative treatment for premature ejaculation.

Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of the on-demand use of paroxetine, dapoxetine, sildenafil and combined dapoxetine with sildenafil in treatment of patients with premature ejaculation: A randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial

The aim of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of the on-demand use of paroxetine, dapoxetine, sildenafil and combined dapoxetine with sildenafil in treatment of patients with premature ejaculation (PE). In a single-blind placebo-controlled clinical study, 150 PE patients without erectile dysfunction (ED) were included during the period of March 2015 to May 2016. Patients were randomly divided into five groups (30 patients each). On demand placebo, paroxetine (30 mg), dapoxetine (30 mg), sildenafil citrate (50 mg) and combined dapoxetine (30 mg) with sildenafil citrate (50 mg) were given for patients for 6 weeks in each group respectively. All patients were instructed to record intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) and evaluated with Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT) and the patient satisfaction score before and after treatment. The mean of IELT, satisfaction score and PEDT in all groups was significantly improved after treatment (p value = .001). Combined dapoxetine with sildenafil group had the best values of IELT, satisfaction scores and PEDT in comparison with other treatment groups (p value <.001). The combined dapoxetine with sildenafil therapy could significantly improve PE patients without ED as compared to paroxetine alone or dapoxetine alone or sildenafil alone with tolerated adverse effects.