Medium-term efficacy of the prostatic urethral lift

Multiparametric-magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) of the prostate and Urolift: Identifying artefact size, location and clinical implications

Objectives

We sought to define the degree of artefact caused by prostatic urethral lift (PUL) on multiparametric-magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) to determine the location, size of artefact and if the device could potentially obscure a diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Methods

Ten patients were prospectively enrolled to undergo PUL for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and follow-up imaging. A standard mp-MRI protocol using a 3.0 Tesla scanner was performed prior to and following Urolift insertion. Pre- and post-PUL images were compared to measure maximum artefact diameter around each implant in each MRI parameter. A transverse relaxation time weighted (T2) artefact reduction protocol was also evaluated. The location of each artefact was then compared to a separate database of 225 consecutive patients who underwent magnetic resonance guided prostate biopsies.

Results

Artefact occurred around the stainless steel urethral implant component only. Mean T2 artefact maximum diameter was 7.7 mm (sd = 1.71 mm), with an artefact reduction protocol reducing this to 5.4 mm (sd = 1.43). Mean dynamic-contrast-enhancement artefact was 10 mm (sd = 2.5 mm), and mean diffusion-weighted-imaging artefact was 28.2 mm (sd = 7.8 mm). All artefacts were confined to the posterior transition zone only. In the 225 consecutive patients who had undergone magnetic resonance guided prostate biopsies, there were 55 positive biopsies with prostate cancer, with 13 cases found in the transition zones and no cancer identified solely in the posterior transitional zone.

Conclusions

The stainless steel urethral component of the PUL does cause artefact, which is confined to the posterior transition zone only. PUL artefact occurs in an area of the prostate that has a very low incidence of a single focus of prostate cancer. If there is concern for prostate cancer in the posterior TZ (e.g. if every other area is clear with a high PSA), this area can undergo targeted biopsy.

Incidence of Surgical Reintervention for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Following Prostatic Urethral Lift, Transurethral Resection of the Prostate, and Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate: A TriNetX Analysis

Background

Prostatic urethral lift, or UroLift, has gained popularity as a treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Surgical reintervention rates are a reliable indicator for treatment durability.

Objective

The objective of this study was to utilize TriNetX, a third-party database, to investigate the incidence of surgical reintervention following UroLift, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), and photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) procedures for BPH from 2015 to 2018.

Design setting and participants

Male patients aged 18-100 yr diagnosed with BPH were identified in the TriNetX Diamond Network database between January 2015 and December 2018. Cohorts of individuals undergoing their first UroLift procedure were built using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes. TURP and PVP cohorts were built as comparison groups. The cohorts were then queried for subsequent BPH-related procedures.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

Reprocedure rates were assessed and descriptive statistics were used.

Results and limitations

The mean age at first-time UroLift was 70.1 ± 9.4 yr (n = 14 343). Cumulative reprocedure rates collected after first-time UroLift included 1 yr after UroLift (5.1%, n = 14 343) and 4 yr after UroLift (16.1%, n = 710), with an average annual increase of +3.6% per year following 1 yr after the procedure. Comparatively, TURP (n = 22 071) and PVP (n = 14 110) had 4-yr reprocedure rates of 7.5% and 7.8%, respectively, during the same timeframe. Limitations include a lack of clinical data and loss of follow-up data outside the Diamond Network.

Conclusions

The reprocedure rate of UroLift at 4 yr is double the rate of TURP and PVP. In appropriately selected patients, UroLift might be a suitable option for those who desire symptomatic relief from BPH with minimal erectile and ejaculatory side effects. However, the risk of secondary surgical intervention should be considered when considering BPH treatments.

Patient summary

We compared the reintervention rates of prostatic urethral lift (PUL), transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), and photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) using the TriNetX database, and have found that the highest reintervention rates were for PUL of 16% at 4 yr of follow-up, compared with about 8% for those who had TURP and PVP. Interestingly, the most common reintervention was the same operation at 1 yr. This has important implications when counseling patients about the durability of these various outlet procedures for BPH.

Are all procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia created equal? A systematic review on post-procedural PSA dynamics and its correlation with relief of bladder outlet obstruction

PURPOSE

To evaluate and provide a comprehensive literature review of Prostate specific antigen (PSA) dynamics after various surgical procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

A thorough PubMed database search was performed over last 30 years including terms "PSA" and various surgical procedures for BPH. PSA nadir after various procedure was evaluated. The post-operative improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum void rates and post-void residue after surgeries were recorded. An indirect correlation was made between PSA nadir and outcome of various BPH surgical procedures.

RESULTS

Enucleation procedures like simple prostatectomy and endoscopic enucleation of prostate (EEP) produced maximum drop in PSA level after surgery and were associated with the highest improvement in post-operative parameters. The PSA nadir following resection techniques like transurethral resection of prostate and Holmium laser resection of prostate and vaporization technique was variable and less robust when compared to EEP. Newer techniques like Aquablation, Rezum, Urolift, Prostate artery embolization and Temporary implantable nitinol devices (iTIND) produce relatively less reduction in PSA and lesser percentile improvement in post-operative parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Various surgical procedures for BPH result in varying PSA nadirs level. Enucleation procedures and simple prostatectomy produce the most drastic and sustained decrease in PSA. There is a possible indirect evidence suggesting that the level of PSA nadir corresponds closely with the degree of post-operative improvement and durability of the procedure. Establishing the new PSA nadir at 3-6 months after the procedure is recommended as a part of routine surveillance for prostate cancer in eligible patients.

Prostatic Urethral Lift in Patients With Obstructive Median Lobes: A Single Surgeon Experience at an Academic Center

OBJECTIVE

To examine the long-term efficacy of prostatic urethral lift (PUL) for treating men, with or without an obstructive median lobe (OML), who suffer from lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on all consecutive PUL cases with or without OML from October 2017 to November 2019 by a single academic surgeon. Outcomes were measured using the International Prostate Symptoms Survey (IPSS) with quality of life (QoL) scores. Comparative testing and mixed-effects linear regression analysis were utilized with significance set at α = 0.05 and performed with Stata (College Station, TX).

RESULTS

A total of 110 PUL procedures were performed on 106 patients (4 repeat surgeries) with a median age of 66.5 (interquartile range: 60.4-73.7). Twenty-three patients (21.7%) had an OML. Following PUL, patients in both groups showed significant improvements in IPSS (P <.001) and QoL (P <.001) scores. When stratifying by OML and controlling for confounding, IPSS scores in both groups displayed statistically significant improvement at follow-up visits, with no statistically significant intergroup difference (P = .32). The same held true for QoL improvements, with no statistically significant difference between groups (P = .18). The presence of an OML resulted in minimal effects on perioperative outcomes and complications but required significantly more implants (P = .008).

CONCLUSION

PUL is a minimally invasive procedure effective at reducing lower urinary tract symptoms and improving the lives of men with benign prostatic hyperplasia without incurring risks of serious complications. These improvements were equivalent and upheld in patients who presented with OML.

Preserving ejaculatory function in young patients with lower urinary tract symptoms: medium- to long-term follow-up of prostatic urethral lift at a single center

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Prostatic urethral lift (Urolift™) is a minimally invasive technique to treat male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The aim of the present study was to assess safety and medium- to long-term outcomes in the relief of urinary symptoms.

METHODS

We included 35 men, affected by severe symptomatic BPH evaluated by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), with normal erectile function (EF) and ejaculatory function (EjF) evaluated by the International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF-5) and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire for Ejaculatory Dysfunction (MSHQ-EjD-SF). Exclusion criteria were prostate larger than 70 cm3, bladder neck sclerosis, concomitant third prostatic lobe, and/or other cervical urethral obstruction or cancer. All patients, preoperatively, performed uroflowmetry (UFM) with peak flow (Q-max) and post void residual volume (PVR), digital rectal exam, transrectal prostate ultrasound to measure prostate volume, PSA, and cystoscopy. Follow-up was scheduled at 1-3-6 months, then yearly, evaluating UFM, IPSS, IIEF-5, and MSHQ-EjD-SF.

RESULTS

All procedures were performed by a single senior surgeon and follow-up was 33.8 ± 12 months. Preoperative PSA was 0.82 ± 0.4 ng/ml and mean operative time was 19.6 ± 10 min and 3 (2-4) implants per patient were used. Parameters reported at last follow-up schedule were: Q-max increase of 68% (p = 0.001), PVR reduction 68% (p = 0.005), and IPSS reduction 55% (p < 0.0001). EF and EjF were similarly preserved, and no patients presented retrograde ejaculation. A total of 88.6% of patients were satisfied with LUTSs improvement and 100% satisfied with EjF.

CONCLUSION

Urolift can improve urinary disorders secondary to BPH, preserving EjF and EF. It is a safe and easy method, reproducible, and with low incidence of complications. Careful selection of patients is mandatory. The main reason for dissatisfaction is the higher expectation of better BPH symptoms relief although patients with high bladder neck and/or prostate volume >45 cm3 were aware of the possible failure.

Large pelvic hematoma following UroLift procedure causing renal failure requiring dialysis

The prostatic urethral lift procedure is a minimally invasive treatment option for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia, with reported benefit of less adverse effects than traditional treatments. While complications are usually minimal, our patient developed a large pelvic hematoma and the first case of organ failure after prostatic urethral lift. He required temporary dialysis during his extended postoperative admission, and his chronic kidney disease permanently progressed from stage III to stage IV. This case highlights the need for research into the safest preoperative and operative approach for prostatic urethral lift procedures in patients with comorbidities.

Efficacy of prostatic urethral lift compared with transurethral resection of the prostate

This article reviews the prostatic urethral lift (PUL) and its potential benefits and risks compared with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). TURP is the traditional procedure for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and is associated with ejaculatory and erectile dysfunction. PUL is a minimally invasive option, but its efficacy has not been well studied. A literature review indicates that both procedures should be afforded equal consideration, and both have limitations. Further long-term research is needed to establish if PUL is superior to TURP.

Prostatic Artery Embolization and Sexual Function: Literature Review and Comparison to Other Urologic Interventions

Many interventions to treat men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) associated lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are associated with sexual side effects or complications, such as hematospermia, erectile dysfunction, or ejaculatory dysfunction. As loss of sexual function can significantly impact quality of life, an optimal treatment for BPH associated LUTS would be one without any sexual dysfunction side effects. Prostatic artery embolization is a minimally invasive treatment for men with BPH associated LUTS. The aim of this paper is to review the effects of prostatic artery embolization on sexual function and compare the sexual side effect profile to the other available BPH procedures.

The UroLift® System for lower urinary tract obstruction: patient selection for optimum clinical outcome

INTRODUCTION

The minimally invasive UroLift^® System procedure in moderate-to-severe benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) refractory to medical treatment may be superior over other prostate procedures regarding its preserved sexual function post-operatively. We aimed to optimise patient selection criteria for the UroLift^® System.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty-one men that underwent UroLift^® System surgery were retrospectively reviewed over >24 months. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of UroLift^® System, pre-operatively and at three, six, 12, and 24 months post-operatively, assessing the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPPS), urinary flow rates (Qmax), post void residual (PVR) bladder scan volumes and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Adverse events were assessed by Clavien-Dindo Classification.

RESULTS

The 51 men undergoing UroLift^® System had a success rate of 92.2% over 2 years, with improvements in Qmax, IPSS and PVR. IIEF was preserved in all cases. Adverse events were Clavien-Dindo grade 1, most commonly mild-to-severe dysuria (19.6%), and resolved spontaneously. Four patients failed to improve.

CONCLUSION

Patient-related selection criteria to optimise the UroLift^® System clinical outcomes include age, Qmax, PVR urine, median lobe, PSA levels, prostate volume, IPSS and IIEF scores. The UroLift^® System is safe and effective in moderate-to-severe BPH refractory to pharmacological treatments and avoids retrograde ejaculation.

Indications, techniques, and role of new minimally invasive benign prostate hyperplasia surgical options

Novel emerging techniques for the surgical treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) related to lower urinary tract symptoms are being investigated very seriously to help search for a better method, and the studies are getting their place in the literature. In this review article, UroLift^® system, (i)TIND^®, Aquablation^®, Rezūm® system, and prostatic artery embolization have been discussed according to the literature and both European and American urological guidelines. All related randomized controlled trials are discussed under the appropriate headings. Indications, technique, and the role of these minimally invasive surgical options for BPH are assessed. These methods, which are still being studied, are promising for the future. As the studies get completed, the indications will become clearer, and these techniques will find their respective places as the personalized treatment options.