The impact of perioperative blood transfusion on survival outcomes in radical cystectomy patients

The impact of chemotherapy-naïve open radical cystectomy delay and perioperative transfusion on the recurrence-free survival: A perioperative parameters-based nomogram

Objective

To develop and internally validate a nomogram to predict recurrence-free survival (RFS) including the time to radical cystectomy (RC) and perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) as potential predictors.

Methods

Patients who underwent open RC and ileal conduit between January 1996 to December 2016 were split into developing (n=948) and validating (n=237) cohorts. The time to radical cystectomy (TTC) was defined as the interval between the onset of symptoms and RC. The regression coefficients of the independent predictors obtained by Cox regression were used to construct the nomogram. Discrimination, validation, and clinical usefulness in the validation cohort were assessed by the area under the curve, the calibration plot, and decision curve analysis.

Results

In the developing dataset, the 1-, 5-, and 10-year RFS were 83.0%, 47.2%, and 44.4%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, independent predictors were TTC (hazards ratio [HR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.08, p<0.001), PBT (one unit: HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.03-1.90, p=0.03; two or more units: HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.29-2.29, p<0.001), bilateral hydronephrosis (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.21-1.97, p<0.001), squamous cell carcinoma (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45-0.81, p=0.001), pT3-T4 (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.41-2.22, p<0.001), lymph node status (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.21-1.95, p<0.001), and lymphovascular invasion (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.01-1.62, p=0.044). The areas under the curve in the validation dataset were 79.3%, 69.6%, and 76.2%, for 1-, 5-, and 10-year RFS, respectively. Calibration plots showed considerable correspondence between predicted and actual survival probabilities. The decision curve analysis revealed a better net benefit of the nomogram.

Conclusion

A nomogram with good discrimination, validation, and clinical utility was constructed utilizing TTC and PBT in addition to standard pathological criteria.

Prognostic Implication and Survival Outcomes of Perioperative Blood Transfusion on Urological Malignancies Undergoing Radical Surgical Intervention

Background & Objective

Background and objective: Perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) during radical urological surgeries has been associated with an increased incidence of complications. The present study analyzes the outcome of perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) and the prognostic implications after radical surgeries on patients with malignant urological tumors.

Methods

Our retrospective study included 792 cases of partial or radical nephrectomy /cystectomy/prostatectomy surgeries for kidney/bladder/ prostate carcinoma from 2012 to 2022. Data on preoperative, intraoperative, and pathological parameters were evaluated. PBT was taken as a period of transfusion of allogenic RBC during/preoperative/postoperative surgeries. The effect of PBT on oncological parameters like recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-free survival (CSS) was compared using univariate cox regression analysis (Odds ratio, Hazard ratio).

Results

PBT was applied on 124 (20.6%) patients of nephrectomy, 54 (46.5%) patients of cystectomy, and 23 (31%) patients of prostatectomy. The baseline characteristics of the cohort study found symptomatic patients with older age and other co-morbidities to be transfusion-dependent. Also, the patients undergoing radical operations with more blood loss and advanced tumor stage were more likely to receive PBT. PBT was significantly associated with survival outcomes (P<0.05) in nephrectomy and cystectomy cases but independent of association in prostatectomy cases.

Conclusion

The result of this study concludes that in nephrectomy and cystectomy operations, PBT had a significant association with cancer recurrence and mortality; however, in prostatectomy cases, no significant correlation was noted. Thus, proper criteria to prevent the unnecessary use of PBT and more defined parameters for transfusion are needed to improve postoperative survival. Autologous transfusion should be considered more frequently. However, more extensive studies and randomized trials are needed in this area.

Fibrinogen prophylaxis for reducing perioperative bleeding in patients undergoing radical cystectomy: A double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

Excessive bleeding is an important complication of radical cystectomy. We aimed to assess whether preoperative administration of fibrinogen decreases perioperative bleeding and improves the outcome of radical cystectomy.

DESIGN

Double-blinded randomized trial with two parallel arms.

SETTING

The study was conducted in the department of surgery at a teaching hospital affiliated with a University of Medical Sciences.

PATIENTS

In total, 70 men undergoing radical cystectomy were randomized to fibrinogen (n = 35) and placebo-control groups. Mean (SD) age was 64.7 (7.4) years.

INTERVENTIONS

The intervention group received 2 g fibrinogen concentrate diluted in 100 ml distilled water, and the control group received 100 ml normal saline; both intravenously 15 ̶ 30 min before the start of the surgery.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the amount of perioperative blood loss. The secondary outcomes were hemodynamic features and vital signs.

MAIN RESULTS

Fibrinogen significantly decreased the volume of blood loss (p < 0.001) and the total number of transfused packed-cell units per group (38 vs. 115 units); and compensated the decrease of HCO3 (p = 0.030), the mean arterial pressure (p < 0.001), hemoglobin O2 saturation (p = 0.001), heart rate (p < 0.001), and temperature (p < 0.001) throughout the surgery compared with the placebo. Patients in the fibrinogen group had shorter Intensive Care Unit (p = 0.001) and hospital (p < 0.001) stay. We did not find any adverse reaction in our patients receiving fibrinogen concentrate.

CONCLUSION

Fibrinogen concentrate reduces perioperative bleeding and the need for blood transfusion in radical cystectomy. It improves the outcomes of the surgery and decreases patients' length of stay in the healthcare system following radical cystectomy.

REGISTRATION

Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) http://www.irct.ir/, reference number: IRCT20191013045091N1.

ETHICS CODE

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, reference number: IR.SBMU.RETECH.REC.1398.033.