How long does it take a man to collect his semen specimen in a busy infertility clinic?

Experiences of men undergoing assisted reproductive technology: A qualitative systematic review

BACKGROUND

Many infertile couples undergo assisted reproductive technology (ART) to increase pregnancy chances, with many of them experiencing psychosocial distress. Although research has been performed on women's experiences of ART, there is limited focus on men.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review consolidated and synthesized men's experiences with ART to better understand their needs and challenges to support them.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Nine electronic databases were searched from the inception date until November 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

This review included published and unpublished primary studies with qualitative methodologies exploring men's experiences with ART.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The screening of studies, methodological assessment, data extraction, and analysis were conducted by two reviewers independently. The data were thematically synthesized.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen studies were included. An overarching theme of "despair to destiny" was identified, with four synthesized themes: (1) "the roller coaster ride," (2) "what made it from bad to worse?", (3) "what kept men going?", and (4) "hopeful for the future."

CONCLUSION

Men undergoing ART experienced struggles, a transition of emotions, and a need for support as they attempted to cope with unknowns while remaining hopeful for future outcomes. There is a need for health care interventions and policies to address the issue to improve the well-being of male ART patients. Interventions should be tailored to the specific support groups that cater to the emotional and informational needs of male ART patients. Future research should focus on the influence of cultural sensitivities on men's ART experiences, to tailor support programs to address their psychological needs during ART.

Development and validation of a novel mail-in semen analysis system and the correlation between one hour and delayed semen analysis testing

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a novel, mail-in semen analysis (SA) system.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENT(S)

Ejaculates from normospermic men.

INTERVENTION(S)

One-hour SA, then repeat SAs (on same ejaculate) over 52 hours using a novel technique for maintaining sperm viability.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

World Health Organization SA parameters.

RESULT(S)

One-hour SA on 104 ejaculates in the validation phase of the study demonstrated normal semen parameters. With up to 52 hours of observation and four subsequent SA measurements/ejaculate, concentration remained stable, motility decreased by 0.39%/h, and normal morphology decreased by 0.1%/h. Measured 1-hour and calculated motility (correlation coefficients 0.87) and morphology (correlation coefficients 0.82) strongly were correlated.

CONCLUSION

This novel, mail-in, Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-approved SA testing system demonstrates a strong degree of correlation between 1-hour and delayed SA testing. Given the linear motility and morphology decrease and stability of sperm concentration, this test may be used in clinical practice to evaluate semen quality for fertility evaluations. Furthermore, this approach significantly improves the ease, comfort, and efficiency of obtaining a SA, likely breaking down early barriers to accessing successfully a male fertility evaluation.