Second line immune checkpoint inhibition in urothelial cancer

The evolving treatment landscape of metastatic urothelial cancer

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is currently the first-line standard of care for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC); however, up to 50% of patients are ineligible for cisplatin, necessitating alternative treatment options. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been shown to be effective in cisplatin-ineligible patients. However, despite advances in the first-line setting, the prognosis remains poor, and challenges persist in selecting optimal therapies, treatment sequences and combination regimens. Maintenance therapy with avelumab revealed improved overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with best supportive care alone in patients with platinum-responsive mUC. Antibody-drug conjugates and targeted therapy with fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors have shown promise in selected patients, particularly in patients with metastatic disease that has progressed despite platinum-based chemotherapy. At the European Society of Medical Oncology Congress in 2023, groundbreaking results were presented from two phase III trials, EV-302/KEYNOTE-A39 and CheckMate 901, focusing on previously untreated mUC. In the former, the combination of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab showed significant improvements in OS, PFS and overall response rate compared with chemotherapy alone; the combination of nivolumab with gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy demonstrated a significant extension in median OS, PFS and overall response rate compared with chemotherapy alone. In addition, erdafitinib therapy resulted in significantly longer OS than chemotherapy among patients with mUC and FGFR alterations after previous treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. This comprehensive summary of the current treatment landscape for mUC incorporates clinical trial evidence and discussion of agents that are currently under investigation to provide support for clinical decision making and understanding of future therapeutic approaches.

Immune checkpoint gene signature assesses immune infiltration profiles in bladder cancer and identifies KRT23 as an immunotherapeutic target

BACKGROUND

In the past few decades, researchers have made promising progress, including the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the therapy of bladder cancer (BLCA). Existing studies mainly focus on single immune checkpoint inhibitors but lack relevant studies on the gene expression profiles of multiple immune checkpoints.

METHODS

RNA-sequencing profiling data and clinical information of BLCA patients and normal human bladder samples were acquired from the Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus databases and analyzed to identify different expression profiles of immune checkpoint genes (ICGs) after consensus clustering analysis. Based on the 526 intersecting differentially expressed genes, the LASSO Cox regression analysis was utilized to construct the ICG signature.

RESULTS

According to the expression of ICGs, BLCA patients were divided into three subtypes with different phenotypic and mechanistic characteristics. Furthermore, the developed ICG signature were independent predictors of outcome in BLCA patients, and was correlated with the immune infiltration, the expression of ICGs and chemotherapeutic effect.

CONCLUSIONS

This study systematically and comprehensively analyzed the expression profile of immune checkpoint genes, and established the ICG signature to investigate the differences in ICGs expression and tumor immune microenvironment, which will help risk stratification and accelerate precision medicine. Finally, we identified KRT23 as the most critical model gene, and highlighted KRT23 as a potential target to enhance immunotherapy against BLCA.

Immunotherapies in Genitourinary Oncology: Where Are We Now? Where Are We Going?

Simple Summary

Genitourinary malignancies include cancers along the urinary tract and the male reproductive tract, encompassing the adrenal glands, kidneys, bladder, prostate, and testicles. Immunotherapy, which treats cancer by using the immune system to attack malignant cells, has historically been successful in treating some types of genitourinary cancers, especially of the bladder and kidney. In the past decade, a more precise method of immunotherapy, known as immune checkpoint inhibition, has gained popularity as it enhances the immune system’s ability to recognize and destroy tumor cells. Several immune checkpoint inhibitors have achieved success in patients with advanced genitourinary cancers. This review provides a brief overview of traditional immunotherapies, focuses on how immune checkpoint inhibitors have achieved success in patients with advanced cancers, and investigates the role for immunotherapy in genitourinary malignancies in the future.

Abstract

For decades, limited options existed to treat metastatic genitourinary cancers, including treatment options that could be classified as immunotherapy. Historically, immunotherapy centered on systemic cytokines for the treatment of metastatic kidney cancer, which had several adverse effects, as well as the Bacillus Calmette–Guérin vaccine for non-metastatic bladder cancer. Within the past decade, advances in immunotherapy have led to several approvals from the United States Food and Drug Administration, particularly in the field of immune checkpoint inhibition. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now being used extensively to treat multiple solid tumors, including kidney and bladder cancers, and they are also being tested in many other cancers. Despite encouraging data from phase 2/3 clinical trials, less is known about biomarkers that may predict better response to ICIs. The effect of ICIs in genitourinary cancers is heterogeneous, with some tumor types having little clinical data available, or ICIs having limited activity in other tumors. In this review, we briefly discuss approved immunotherapy agents prior to the time of ICIs. Then, given the emergence of this class of agents, we summarize the several important ICIs and the clinical trials that led to their approval. Finally, we mention ongoing and future clinical trials.

Update on systemic treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a narrative review of the literature

Urothelial cancer (UC) is most commonly found in the urinary bladder, but can also appear in the upper urinary tract, where it is associated with several disease-specific challenges affecting its diagnosis, clinical staging, surgical management, and systemic therapy. A significant number of patients experience extra-vesical disease recurrence despite radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), leading to inevitable demise. Over the last years, the therapeutic armamentarium of UC has expanded with several systemic treatment options entering clinical care and deliver the potential to support a more individualized treatment in the near future. Currently, novel targeted therapies are emerging, accompanied with extensive biomarker research, which leads to a better understanding of the disease and therefore, reshaping the treatment landscape continuously and decisively. Though, systemic treatment of UTUC comes along with certain challenges that are specific to the disease, e.g., loss of renal function after RNU, which might result in ineligibility for a cisplatin-based chemotherapy. In this narrative review, the current standard of systemic treatment of UC in the perioperative and metastatic treatment setting are reported, with focus on UTUC. In addition, molecular aspects of UTUC, as well as future directions and specific implications for treatment of patients diagnosed with UTUC are discussed.

Immune checkpoint inhibition in muscle-invasive and locally advanced bladder cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have been implemented in the treatment algorithm of metastatic urothelial cancer as they have shown higher and more sustained responses compared with conventional second-line chemotherapy. Recently, several clinical trials have reported on CPIs in earlier disease stages such as muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). This review summarizes ongoing clinical trials and results from early phase clinical trials in muscle invasive and locally advanced bladder cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

In phase II clinical trials, neoadjuvant use of CPIs as mono and combination therapy, in patients with MIBC planned for radical cystectomy, has shown promising pathological complete response rates. Whether this will translate in survival benefit remains to be assessed. Combination of CPIs and conventional chemotherapy or other targeted agents promises to increase the efficacy of perioperative systemic therapy with potentially additive toxicities. Recently, preclinical models of combined trimodal therapy with CPIs delivered the proof of principle leading to several ongoing trials in this setting.

SUMMARY

First results of clinical trials evaluating CPIs in MIBC demonstrate very promising results that warrant further investigation as they could revolutionize management of MIBC in the near future. The trend and hope are toward higher rates of safe and sustained bladder preservation.