Bone metastasis of esophageal carcinoma diagnosed as a first primary tumor: a population-based study

Advanced esophageal cancer with bone metastases: Prognostic biomarkers and palliative treatment

Esophageal cancer (EC) is a common and devastating tumor of the upper digestive tract. Unfortunately, by the time any symptoms have manifested, the disease has often progressed to an advanced stage and is accompanied by macro- and micrometastases, including in the bones. The treatment of esophageal cancer with bone metastases remains clinically challenging, given the poor prognosis associated with this condition. Effective prognostic biomarkers can help medical staff choose the appropriate operation and treatment plan, that is for most beneficial for making patients. Current treatments for esophageal cancer with bone metastases include pain-relieving drugs, surgical therapy, radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy (CT, including molecular-targeted drug therapy), endocrine therapy (ET), bisphosphonates (BPs) and interventional therapy. Of these robust measures, radiotherapy has emerged as a particularly promising therapy for bone metastases from esophageal cancer. Substantial progress has been made in radiation therapy techniques since the discovery of X-rays by Roentgen in 1895. In its palliative capacity, the key goals of radiotherapy are to relieve the patients' bone pain and debilitate effects, including relieving spinal cord compression, correcting the spinal deformity and restoring spinal stability. However, it is worth mentioning that RT for esophageal cancer has various side effects. Currently, the available studies focused exclusively on radiotherapy for ECBM are too small to draw any definitive conclusions, and each of these studies has significant limitations. In this review, in addition to the epidemiology described at the beginning, we will explore the current prognostic biomarkers and radiotherapy for esophageal cancer, with a particular focus on those with bone metastases.

Two novel clinical tools to predict the risk of bone metastasis and overall survival in esophageal cancer patients: a large population-based retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to construct two web-based nomograms to predict the probability of bone metastasis (BM) in esophageal cancer (EC) patients and the prognostic of EC patients with BM (ECBM).

METHODS

We collected the data of EC and ECBM patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015. Independent risk variables for the development of BM in EC patients were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to assess independent prognostic variables in ECBM patients. And then, constructed two nomograms to predict the risk of bone metastases and overall survival (OS) of ECBM patients. Survival differences were studied by Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival analysis. The predictive efficacy and clinical applicability of these two nomograms were assessed by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the area under curve (AUC), calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

We selected a total of 6839 patients with EC, of which 326 (4.77%) had BM at the time of initial diagnosis. The results of K-M survival and Cox regression analysis showed significant effects of BM on the OS in EC patients. Age, N stage, tumor size and brain/liver/lung organ metastasis were identified as BM-related risk variables. Chemotherapy and brain/liver organ metastasis were identified as ECBM-related prognostic variables. The ROC, AUC, calibration curves and DCA of two nomograms all showed excellent predictive efficacy and clinical applicability.

CONCLUSIONS

These two nomograms were constructed and validated, which could objectively predict the risk of BM in EC patients and the prognostic in ECBM patients. These tools are expected to make valuable contributions in clinical work, informing surgeons in making decisions about patient care.

Surgical Outcome and Prognosis of Patients with Spinal Metastasis from Esophageal Cancer: The Experience from a Single Center

BACKGROUND

The spine is one of the common sites of esophageal cancer metastasis, with a worse prognosis than that of metastasis occurring in other sites. However, the exact mechanism underlying metastatic spinal esophageal cancer (MSEC) is poorly understood possibly due to the short survival time of patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical outcomes and factors affecting the prognosis of patients with MSEC.

METHODS

Enrolled in this retrospective study were 20 consecutive patients who received surgical treatment for MSEC in our hospital from 2013 to 2020. The impact of surgery on patient's quality of life was assessed by visual analog scale score and American Spinal Injury Association grade. Prognostic variables relative to traditional clinical parameters and inflammation and nutrition indicators were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The median survival time of patients with MSEC was 6 months, with a one-year survival rate of 20%. Pain relief was achieved in most patients, and nerve function was recovered in part of the patients after surgery. Analysis of clinical factors showed that total tumor resection was beneficial to overall survival of patients with MSEC. Laboratory indicators of erythrocyte sedimentation rate, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, and platelet/lymphocyte ratio were identified as independent prognostic factors for patients with MSEC.

CONCLUSIONS

Timely surgical intervention can improve the quality of life of patients with MSEC. The preoperative erythrocyte sedimentation rate, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, and platelet/lymphocyte ratio could help predict the overall survival of patients with MSEC. These findings may help in decision-making for the treatment of patients with MSEC.