Fruquintinib in combination with sintilimab or TAS-102 as third-line or above treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a real-world study

Fruquintinib in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter real-world analysis on efficacy, safety, and predictive and prognostic factors

Background

Randomized trials have shown a survival benefit for fruquintinib over placebo in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) that progressed after standard therapies, but real-world prognostic analyses have been seldom reported. We evaluated survival, safety outcomes, and predictive and prognostic factors in patients treated with fruquintinib in a real-life setting.

Methods

We conducted a multi-center study by collecting relevant data on patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) who received fruquintinib, focusing on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and L3 skeletal muscle index (SMI), including safety follow-up.

Results

From January 2020 to January 2022, a total of 140 patients were selected and included in this study. The cut-off date was 30 July 2022. The median follow-up time was 18.3 months (range, 6-29.3 months) and the median age of included cases was 63 years (range, 32-81 years). The median PFS and OS for the 140 patients was 6.3 and 12.6 months, respectively. The median PFS and OS for the 76 patients who were included in SMI analysis was 6.0 and 12.0 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis suggested brain metastasis {hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 2.779 (1.162-6.646), P=0.02}, decrease in SMI of >5% [HR (95% CI): 9.732 (2.201-43.028), P=0.003], and baseline carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level [HR (95% CI): 4.061 (1.391-11.858), P=0.01] as independent predictors of OS. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were hypertension (24, 17.1%), fatigue (21, 15%), and hand-foot syndrome (20, 14.3%); 9 (13.6%) and 15 (10.7%) patients had dose reduction and treatment discontinuation due to TRAEs respectively.

Conclusions

The real-world efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in advanced CRC patients are numerically superior to that in the previous phase III studies. SMI, brain metastasis and CEA could serve as potential markers for patient selection.

Metabolism, toxicity and management of fruquintinib: a novel drug for metastatic colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most diagnosed cancer globally and despite therapeutic strides, the prognosis for patients with metastatic disease (mCRC) remains poor. Fruquintinib is an oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting VEGFR -1, -2, and -3, and has recently received approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treatment of mCRC refractory to standard chemotherapy, anti-VEGF therapy, and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This article provides an overview of the pre-clinical data, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety profile of fruquintinib, as well as the management of clinical toxicities associated with fruquintinib.

EXPERT OPINION

Fruquintinib is a valuable additional treatment option for patients with refractory mCRC. The pivotal role of vigilant toxicity management cannot be understated. While fruquintinib offers a convenient and overall, well-tolerated treatment option, ongoing research is essential to determine its efficacy in different patient subsets, evaluate it in combination with chemotherapy and immunotherapy, and determine its role in earlier lines of therapy.

Efficacy, safety, and predictors of fruquintinib plus anti-programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) antibody in refractory microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer in a real-world setting: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) have few alternatives for salvage therapy and a large unmet clinical need. Preclinical studies demonstrate that fruquintinib combined with anti-programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) has a synergistic anti-tumor effect. But a few phase 2 clinical studies show inconsistent efficacy of this combination therapy in CRC. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy, safety, and predictors of fruquintinib plus PD-1 antibodies in refractory MSS metastatic CRC (mCRC) in a real-world setting.

Methods

We performed a retrospective single-center analysis to assess the outcomes of patients with MSS mCRC who were treated with fruquintinib plus anti-PD-1 antibodies subsequent to the failure of standard therapies at the Hunan Cancer Hospital. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and toxicity were reviewed and evaluated. The primary endpoint was OS. The impact on OS and PFS was examined using the Cox regression model.

Results

Between 1 January 2019 and 30 June 2022, we enrolled 70 eligible patients. The median follow-up was 17.2 months (range, 5.3-32.9 months). The median OS (mOS) and median PFS (mPFS) were 19.48 and 5.5 months respectively. The ORR was 11.43% and the DCR was 84.29%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis reveals liver metastasis (LM) without local treatment was a risk factor for OS [hazard ratio (HR) =5.31, P=0.0184], whereas that with local treatment (HR =2.19, P=0.263) was not. The most common adverse events were hand-foot syndrome (37.14%), hypertension (34.29%), mucositis oral (32.86%). No serious adverse effects or adverse effect-related deaths were reported. There were no instances of severe adverse effects or deaths related to adverse effects reported.

Conclusions

Our study indicates that the combination of fruquintinib and anti-PD-1 antibodies can improve the OS and PFS with a tolerable toxicity profile for Chinese patients with refractory MSS mCRC. LM without local therapy is a negative prognostic factor for OS, but those with local treatment can significantly prolong survival. We require additional well-structured, prospective, and extensive studies to confirm and validate these findings.