Laparoscopic splenic hilar lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer

Surgical Approach to the Upper Side of the Gastrosplenic Ligament During Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer: Operative Techniques and Initial Results

Background: Laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer has become widespread as minimally invasive surgical treatment, but use of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) remains limited because of the technical difficulty and complexity of lymphadenectomy at the splenic hilum. Surgical techniques and initial experiences with the surgical approach to the upper side of the gastrosplenic ligament during LTG are introduced. Materials and Methods: Between January 2019 and December 2022, 57 patients with proximal gastric cancer underwent LTG using this approach. Results: Regarding the extent of lymphadenectomy, D1+, D2, spleen-preserving D2 + 10, and D2 + 10 with splenectomy were performed in 31, 18, 4, and 4 patients, respectively. Operative time was 341 (192-724) minutes, and estimated blood loss was 30 (0-515) g. There were no conversions to laparotomy and no postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III. Conclusions: The present procedure is safe and feasible and provides an excellent operative view at the splenic hilum, making it easier to determine exactly the extent of lymphadenectomy in accordance with cancer progression.

Reappraise role of No. 10 lymphadenectomy for proximal gastric cancer in the era of minimal invasive surgery during total gastrectomy: a pooled analysis of 4 prospective trial

BACKGROUND

For patients with locally advanced proximal gastric cancer (LAPGC), the individualized selection of patients with highly suspected splenic hilar (No. 10) lymph node (LN) metastasis to undergo splenic hilar lymphadenectomy, is a clinical dilemma. This study aimed to re-evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy (LSPSHL) and to identify the population who would benefit from it.

METHODS

A total of 1068 patients (D2 group = 409; D2 + No. 10 group = 659) who underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy from four prospective trials between January 2015 and July 2019 were analyzed.

RESULTS

No significant difference in the incidence (16.9% vs. 16.4%; P = 0.837) of postoperative complications were found between the two groups. The metastasis rate of No. 10 LN among patients in the D2 + No. 10 group was 10.3% (68/659). Based on the decision tree, patients with LAPGC with tumor invading the greater curvature (Gre), patients with non-Gre-invading LAPGC with a tumor size > 5 cm and clinical positive locoregional LNs were defined as the high-priority No. 10 dissection group. The metastasis rate of No. 10 LNs in the high-priority group was 19.4% (41/211). In high-priority group, the 3-year overall survival of the D2 + No. 10 group was better than that of the D2 group (74.4% vs. 42.1%; P = 0.005), and the therapeutic index of No. 10 was higher than the indices of most suprapancreatic stations.

CONCLUSIONS

LSPSHL for LAPGC is safe and feasible when performed by experienced surgeons. LSPSHL could be recommended for the high-priority group patients even without invasion of the Gre.

Laparoscopic perigastric mesogastrium excision technique for radical total gastrectomy

Introduction

Complete mesogastrium excision (CME) of the perigastric mesogastrium and dissection of lymph nodes (LNs) no. 10 and no. 11 remain technically challenging aspects of laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy (LRTG) plus CME. To address some of these difficulties, we introduced the laparoscopic perigastric mesogastrium excision technique (LPMET) and the concept of the “enjoyable space” to partly modify the procedures of conventional radical surgery and characterize the perigastric space and the surgical plane as well as its boundaries.

Aim

To introduce the laparoscopic perigastric mesogastrium excision technique (LPMET) and the “enjoyable space” when undergoing laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy.

Material and methods

From July 2016 to June 2017, 79 cases of upper gastric cancer that were treated by laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy plus CME were investigated. The retrospective database included the patient characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, and morbidity and mortality rates depending on the completeness of their medical records.

Results

Laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy plus CME was successfully performed in all 79 cases. The mean surgical time was 232.5 ±46.0 min, and the intraoperative blood loss was 67.6 ±52.3 ml. A total of 2245 LNs were retrieved (mean 28.1 ±10.8 retrieved from each specimen). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 10.3 ±1.6 days. The postoperative morbidity rate was 17.7%. After a median follow-up period of 12 months, one patient experienced liver metastasis; of the other 78 patients, none died or experienced tumor recurrence or metastasis.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic perigastric mesogastrium excision technique and the “enjoyable space” could be a novel, minimally invasive approach and space to achieve CME and provide benefit for the dissection of LNs no. 10 and no. 11.

Feasibility and Safety of Totally Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: Comparison with Early Gastric Cancer

Purpose

Totally laparoscopic gastrectomy (TLG) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is a technically and oncologically challenging procedure for surgeons. This study aimed to compare the oncologic feasibility and technical safety of TLG for AGC versus early gastric cancer (EGC).

Materials and Methods

Between 2011 and 2016, 535 patients (EGC, 375; AGC, 160) underwent curative TLG for gastric cancer. Clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical outcomes of both patient groups were analyzed and compared.

Results

Patients with AGC required a longer operation time and experienced more intraoperative blood loss than those with EGC did. However, patients from both the AGC and EGC groups demonstrated similar short-term surgical outcomes such as postoperative morbidity (14.4% vs. 13.3%, P=0.626), mortality (0% vs. 0.5%, P=0.879), time-to-first oral intake (2.7 days for both groups, P=0.830), and postoperative hospital stay (10.2 days vs. 10.1 days, P=0.886). D2 lymph node dissection could be achieved in the AGC group (95%), with an adequate number of lymph nodes being dissected (36.0±14.9). In the AGC group, the 3-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 80.5% and 73.7%, respectively.

Conclusions

TLG is as safe and effective for AGC as it is for EGC.

Compliance to D2 lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic gastrectomy

The objective of this study is to describe the compliance to D2 lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic gastrectomy. Radical partial or total gastrectomy with modified D2 lymphadenectomy is the standard of care for locally advanced gastric cancer. It is unclear whether compliance to D2 lymphadenectomy in laparoscopy is comparable to that in open surgery. A review of the literature was performed and results are described in a descriptive review. Available randomized trials are mostly performed for early gastric cancer, for which formal D2 lymphadenectomy is usually not required. Most trials report no differences in number of retrieved lymph nodes between open and laparoscopic gastrectomy. Only one trial used adherence to D2 lymphadenectomy as primary outcome parameter, and found no difference between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy. Results from randomized trials in advanced gastric cancer are awaited. In the meantime, the laparoscopic approach can be used in experienced centers.

Significance of Splenectomy for Upper Gastric Carcinoma With Invasion to the Greater Curvature

This study aimed to clarify the significance of splenectomy (Sp) for upper gastric carcinoma with invasion to the greater curvature. The Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) conducted a phase III randomized clinical trial (JCOG 0110), where the significance of Sp in total gastrectomy (TG) for upper gastric carcinoma without invasion to the greater curvature was not proved because Sp did not contribute to an improved prognosis. From 1992 to 2010, 167 patients underwent TG for carcinoma of the upper stomach, except for patients with carcinoma of the residual stomach. Among them, 60 patients with tumor invasion to the greater curvature of the upper stomach (Gre group) were enrolled. Within the Gre group, the following factors were compared between the Sp group (n = 30) and non-Sp group (n = 30): patient background, postoperative staging, rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgical outcomes and rates of R0 resection, morbidity, adjuvant chemotherapy, and overall survival (OS). The Gre group patients were relatively younger, and tumor size and the numbers of Borrmann type 4 tumors, circumferential lesions, undifferentiated type lesions, and advanced cases were significantly larger than those in the non-Gre group. There were also significant differences in patient age and organs resected other than the spleen between the Sp group and non-Sp group. There was no significant difference in OS between the 2 groups. The significance of Sp for upper gastric carcinoma with invasion to the greater curvature was equivocal because the patients received no survival benefit by undergoing Sp.