Percutaneous endoscopic intragastric surgery: an organ preserving approach to submucosal tumors at esophagogastric junction

Percutaneous endoscopic intragastric surgery for gastric metastases of renal cell carcinoma: A case report

To our knowledge, this is the first report of percutaneous endoscopic intragastric surgery (PEIGS) for gastric metastases from other organs. A 70-year-old male with a history of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was referred to our department for the treatment of gastric metastasis of RCC. Partial gastrectomy was performed using single-incision PEIGS. Two years after the surgery, a follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a tumor located on the middle greater curvature of the stomach. The diagnosis was metastatic renal cell carcinoma, prompting a similar surgery. No recurrence was observed after the second surgery. PEIGS is a minimally invasive option for the treatment of metastatic gastric tumors.

Robot-assisted distal gastrectomy and local resection for gastric cancer and gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors surrounding the esophagogastric junction are often challenging to resect, with no consensus regarding the optimal surgical technique. Here in, we present a case of concurrent gastric cancer in the antrum and gastrointestinal stromal tumors adjacent to the esophagogastric junction. The patient underwent simultaneous distal gastrectomy and local resection assisted by a surgical robot, avoiding the need for total gastrectomy. The utilization of robot-assisted surgery has become an increasingly popular technique, holding promise for simplifying complex surgical procedures across diverse medical settings.

Comparison between endoscopic and laparoscopic removal of gastric submucosal tumor

BACKGROUND AND AIM

A retrospective study was conducted to compare two resection methods, namely, endoscopic resection (ER) procedures (endoscopic submucosal dissection [ESD], endoscopic muscularis dissection [EMD], and endoscopic full-thickness resection [EFTR]) and laparoscopic resections (LR) (laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery [LECS] and laparoscopic wedge resection).

METHODS

Seventy-three patients who underwent ER (N = 33: ESD, N = 4; EMD, N = 15; EFTR, N = 14) or LR (N = 39: LECS, N = 16; wedge resection, N = 23) for gastric submucosal tumor (G-SMT) smaller than 50 mm were included in this study. Patient/tumor characteristics and intra/postoperative factors were compared between the ER and LR groups.

RESULTS

The ER group had a significantly higher percentage of intraluminal growing type of tumor (100% vs 41%) and smaller tumor size (23 vs 33 mm) than the LR group. The ER group had a significantly shorter operative time (93 vs 145 min) and less blood loss (13 vs 30 mL) than the LR group. In the ER group, three patients who had tumors located on the anterior wall of the stomach required laparoscopic closure after EFTR because of difficulty in endoscopic closure of the gastric-wall defect. Postoperative complication rates and duration of postoperative hospital stays did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

ER may be technically feasible, safe, less invasive, and oncologically appropriate options for selected patients with the intraluminal growing type of G-SMT smaller than 30 mm. EFTR may be more reasonable alternatives to LR in selected patients with a small G-SMT located on the lesser curvature side.