Vascular tumours of the liver: a particular story

Neonatal hepatic hemangioma with intestinal obstruction: A report of two cases

To explore the treatment experience of neonatal hepatic hemangioma (HH) with intestinal obstruction. Case 1 was 2.5 kg at birth and was 7 days old at the time of the visit. Case 1 underwent surgery 2 weeks after birth, and it was confirmed that HH was located in the left inner lobe of the liver, and it adhered to the ileocecal area to form an acute angle, leading to intestinal obstruction. The intestinal obstruction was significantly relieved. Postoperative pathology showed that case 1 had a congenital hemangioma. Case 1 started breastfeeding 3 days after the operation; the bowel function was well recovered, and the abdominal distension was significantly relieved. The child was discharged 1 week after the operation. Case 2 was 2.7 kg at birth and was 1 day old at the time of the visit. Case 2 was operated on 2 days after birth. During the operation, it was confirmed that the hepatic blood vessels were in the right anterior lobe of the liver. Postoperative pathology showed that case 2 had an infantile hemangioma. The posterior intestinal obstruction was significantly relieved. Case 2 began to drink a small amount of water on the 5th day after the operation and started breastfeeding on day 7. The abdominal distension was significantly relieved, and the stools were normal. reexamination showed no obvious recurrence of HH during a 2-year follow-up. Active surgical treatment should be considered if there is a risk of intestinal perforation to prevent serious complications.

Hepatic Small Vessel Neoplasm: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Hepatic small vessel neoplasm (HSVN) is a recently described vascular neoplasm of the liver. It demonstrates an infiltrative growth pattern and lacks cytologic atypia and mitotic activity. So far, no cases of metastasis or disease recurrence after excision have been reported in the literature. In this report, we present the case of a 31-year-old woman with a lesion in segments VII-VIII of the liver who was referred to our surgical department due to right lumbar pain. She underwent an atypical wedge hepatectomy (segments VII, VIII) and cholecystectomy. The histopathology of the resected specimen confirmed a 40mm HSVN. The patient did not receive any adjuvant therapy and is scheduled for follow-up with serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans over the next five years due to the unknown malignant potential of the tumor.

Giant cavernous hemangioma of the liver with satellite nodules: Aspects on tumour/tissue interface: A case report

BACKGROUND

Giant hepatic cavernous hemangioma with multiple satellite nodules is a rare subtype of hepatic cavernous hemangioma, the most common vascular liver tumor. We report on a tumor with unusual histologic features: (1) Finger-like infiltration pattern; (2) lack of encapsulation; (3) blurred tumor/liver interface; and (4) massive satellitosis-referring to the article “Hepatic cavernous hemangioma: underrecognized associated histologic features”.

CASE SUMMARY

A 60-year-old man presented with increasing uncharacteristic abdominal discomfort and mildly elevated blood parameters of acute inflammation. Imaging revealed an unclear, giant liver tumor of the left liver lobe. A massive vascular tumor with extensive satellitosis broadly infiltrating the adjacent liver parenchyma was resected via hemihepatectomy of segments II/III. Histopathological diagnosis was giant hepatic cavernous hemangioma with multiple satellite nodules, featuring unusual characteristics hardly portrayed in the literature. Retrospectively, this particular morphology can explain the difficult pre- and perioperative diagnosis of a vascular liver tumor that is usually readily identifiable by modern imaging methods.

CONCLUSION

This case emphasizes the exact histological workup of tumor and tumor-induced parenchyma changes in radiologically unclassifiable liver tumors.

Clinical evaluation of transcatheter arterial embolization combined with propranolol orally treatment of infantile hepatic hemangioma

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) plus propranolol treatment for infantile hepatic hemangioma (IHH).

METHODS

A retrospective study of symptomatic IHH and hemodynamic changes in IHH was conducted between 2016 and 2019.

RESULTS

There were five boys and seven girls with diffuse lesions (n = 7) and multifocal lesions (n = 5). Hepatomegaly and abdominal distension (n = 6) were the predominant clinical presentations. Seven patients (58.3%) had multiple cutaneous hemangiomas. Pulmonary arterial hypertension, heart failure (n = 4), and hypothyroidism (n = 4) were observed. A total of 17 TAE procedures were performed in 12 IHH cases, with a technical success rate of 100%. All patients received standard propranolol orally, and one patient was orally administered metacortandracin. Two patients died of heart failure and multiple organ dysfunction caused by an enlarged liver. In addition, one patient was not reexamined after discharge. Of the remaining nine children, the average follow-up time was 10.78 months (range 2-28 months), and they all responded well to TAE combined with oral propranolol.

CONCLUSION

TAE combined with propranolol is safe and effective for the treatment of IHH, demonstrating low complication rates.

Advanced epithelioid hemangioendothelioma of the liver: could lenvatinib offer a bridge treatment to liver transplantation?

In this article, we describe the case of a 34-year-old woman presenting a multifocal and metastatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) of the liver. Under classical chemotherapy using cyclophosphamide, there was a fast tumor progression in liver and extra-hepatic metastatic sites (lungs and mediastinal lymph node). Taking into account the patient’s age and the natural history of the HEHE, our goal was to try to bring her to liver transplantation (LT) and lenvatinib was an acceptable candidate for this reason. Shortly after the initiation of lenvatinib before LT and surgery, we observed the enlargement of large devascularized necrotic areas in most of the liver HEHE masses, suggesting a good response. The patient was finally transplanted 6 months after initiation of lenvatinib treatment. Eight months after LT, progression occurred (ascites, peritoneal recurrence, and mediastinal lymph node). After restarting lenvatinib, ascites disappeared and the lymph node decreased in size, suggesting a good response, more than 1 year after her transplantation. This is the first case report to our knowledge that illustrates the benefit of lenvatinib as a neoadjuvant bridge until LT for a multifocal and metastatic HEHE. In addition, this drug has also shown a benefit in term of disease control after a late recurrence of the tumor. We suggest that lenvatinib should be proposed as a bridge to the LT for nonresectable HEHE. Moreover, this drug was also beneficial in the treatment of late recurrence after LT. The absence of pharmacologic interactions between classical immunosuppressive drugs and lenvatinib may allow its use as an early adjuvant approach when the risk of recurrence is high. The strength of our case consists in the long follow-up and the innovative message allowing changing palliative strategies into curative ones in case of advanced HEHE.

Liver transplantation in malignant disease

Liver transplantation for malignant disease has gained increasing attention as part of transplant oncology. Following the implementation of the Milan criteria, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was the first generally accepted indication for transplantation in patients with cancer. Subsequently, more liberal criteria for HCC have been developed, and research on this topic is still ongoing. The evident success of liver transplantation for HCC has led to the attempt to extend its indication to other malignancies. Regarding perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, more and more evidence supports the use of liver transplantation, especially after neoadjuvant therapy. In addition, some data also show a benefit for selected patients with very early stage intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma is a very rare but nonetheless established indication for liver transplantation in primary liver cancer. In contrast, patients with hepatic angiosarcoma are currently not considered to be optimal candidates. In secondary liver tumors, neuroendocrine cancer liver metastases are an accepted but comparability rare indication for liver transplantation. Recently, some evidence has been published supporting the use of liver transplantation even for colorectal liver metastases. This review summarizes the current evidence for liver transplantation for primary and secondary liver cancer.

A Novel Entity Among Vascular Liver Tumors: The First Reported Liver Transplantation. Is It Feasible?

Liver transplant could be considered for certain tumors even if there is still dubious indication, as in the case of hepatic small vessels neoplasms that pose a difficult differential diagnosis with liver angiosarcoma. Liver transplant could be the best choice for patients with stable or slow-progressing tumors, for young patients with impaired quality of life, and when it would use organs that would be otherwise discarded but are capable of affording a good function. Vascular tumors are very heterogeneous cancers and our case represents the first description of a new histologic lesion that cannot be included in any of the pre-existing diagnostic categories. In our paper we want to present our decision to transplant a patient in whom the diagnosis was hepatic small vessels neoplasms (but was still in doubt for angiosarcoma as suggested by pathologists form other institutions). Furthermore, we want to highlight that after liver transplant, a new lesion never described before resulted from the specimen analysis that does not fit any of the pathologic diagnostic categories. This finding could open a scenario for additional improvement in molecular analysis in order to differentiate liver vascular tumors or even single lesion histotypes. This article emphasizes how little we know about the real behavior of liver vascular tumors and their clinical and therapeutic outcomes; we want to raise a question about the possibility for liver transplant in the setting of tumors not yet fully known and in which, in cases of diagnostic doubts, this option has been traditionally excluded, possibly bypassing ethical implications by using marginal donors.

Liver transplantation for rare liver diseases and rare indications for liver transplant

Liver transplantation (LT) is currently considered the gold standard treatment for end-stage liver failure. Compared to the first decades of its use, LT is associated with lower comorbidity and mortality, with a 5-year survival over 70%. Worldwide, liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma represent the major indications to LT. However, almost 1% of LT is performed for rare diseases or rare indications, which include non-hepatocellular malignancy, vascular disorders, metabolic and congenital liver disorders. These diseases can lead to hepatocellular necrosis, biliary tree abnormality and/or hepatomegaly. Most of these diseases are not associated with liver failure but in highly selected patients, LT represent an effective therapy improving the overall survival and quality of life. Rare indications for LT often overlap with rare diseases. However, rare LT indications for non-rare diseases are rising in the last decades, especially for benign primary liver tumor, colon rectal liver metastasis, neuroendocrine liver metastasis, and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Non-rare diseases with rare indication for LT and rare adult disease with an indication for LT are categorized and discussed in detail, focusing on some disorders for which the literature provides a more definitive evidence base. Early referral to a transplant center is encouraged to provide an effective therapeutic option in these non-standard indications for LT.

Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma: A Rare Disease With Favorable Outcomes After Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is a rare vascular tumor with indolent behavior in terms of malignancy. The treatment of choice is either resection in the case of resectable lesions or liver transplantation (LT) for the disseminated intrahepatic form. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of patients with HEHE treated by LT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

There were 18 patients with HEHE who underwent LT between 2002 and 2018 included in this retrospective study. The study group was comprised of young recipients (median age of 39 years) and mainly women (15 of 18; 83.3%). Two recipients had concomitant tumors of epithelioid hemangioendothelioma in the liver and lungs prior to LT. The survival probability was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator.

RESULTS

According to histopathological data, none of the patients had a macrovascular invasion. In 4 patients (22.2%), the disease had spread to the hilar lymph nodes. The maximum diameter of the tumor in the studied group was 18 cm. The survival probability after 1, 5, and 15 years was 94.0%, 82.6%, and 41.3%, respectively. No disease recurrence was observed during a median follow-up of 65.9 months.

CONCLUSION

Liver transplantation provides favorable outcomes for selected patients with a hepatic form of epithelioid hemangioendothelioma.

Infantile hepatic hemangioma: current state of the art, controversies, and perspectives

Infantile hepatic hemangioma (IHH) is a common vascular tumor, distinctive for its perinatal presentation, rapid growth during the first year of life, and subsequent involution. Although they generally follow a benign course, some tumors have been reported to undergo malignant transformation. The diagnosis of IHH is based on patient's medical history, physical examination, and imaging. Moreover, the management of this vascular tumor is based on clinical presentation and includes observational, medical, surgical, and radiological interventional treatment options. The present review presents the currently available data in the literature on the diverse aspects of the terminology, epidemiology, clinical presentation, pathogenesis, diagnosis, indications for surgery, malignant potential, and long-term outcomes of these tumors.Conclusion: No formal guidelines have yet been established for the treatment of these hepatic lesions, and the therapeutic strategies implemented vary widely from simple observation to medical, radiological, and surgical interventions in the prism of multidisciplinary teams.What is Known:• Infantile hepatic hemangioma is the most common benign tumor of the liver in infancy, but despite its benign nature, it can present with life-threatening complications.• The treatment strategies range from simple observation to a series of medical, surgical, and radiological interventions.What is New:• This review gives an overview of the developments and current status about the management of IHH.• The aim of this study is to clear up the confusion and controversy that exists about terminology, diagnosis, and treatment of IHH.

Malignant hepatic vascular tumors in adults: Characteristics, diagnostic difficulties and current management

Malignant vascular tumors of the liver include rare primary hepatic mesenchymal tumors developed in the background of a normal liver parenchyma. Most of them are detected incidentally by the increased use of performing imaging techniques. Their diagnosis is challenging, involving clinical and imaging criteria, with final confirmation by histology and immunohistochemistry. Surgery represents the mainstay of treatment. Liver transplantation (LT) has improved substantially the prognosis of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE), with 5-year patient survival rates of up to 81%, based on the European Liver Intestine Transplantation Association-European Liver Transplant Registry study. Unfortunately, the results of surgery and LT are dismal in cases of hepatic angiosarcoma (HAS). Due to the disappointing results of very short survival periods of approximately 6-7 mo after LT, because of tumor recurrence and rapid progression of the disease, HAS is considered an absolute contraindication to LT. Recurrences after surgical resection are high in cases of HEHE and invariably present in cases of HAS. The discovery of reliable prognostic markers and the elaboration of prognostic scores following LT are needed to provide the best therapeutic choice for each patient. Studies on a few patients have demonstrated the stabilization of the disease in a proportion of patients with hepatic vascular tumors using novel targeted antiangiogenic agents, cytokines or immunotherapy. These new approaches, alone or in combination with other therapeutic modalities, such as surgery and classical chemotherapy, need further investigation to assess their role in prolonging patient survival. Personalized therapeutic algorithms according to the histopathological features, behavior, molecular biology and genetics of the tumors should be elaborated in the near future for the management of patients diagnosed with primary malignant vascular tumors of the liver.