A retrospective case-controlled cohort study of inpatient drug induced liver injury: the RIDDLE study

Network meta-analysis of different liver protective drugs in the treatment of drug-induced liver injury

BACKGROUND

Currently, drug-induced liver injury (DILI) has become one of those public issues in society, which has added a huge burden to both the individuals and the society. In the current clinical stage, there are numerous drugs developed to treat this disease, and different drug treatment measures have been proven to achieve certain clinical efficacy in the corresponding randomized controlled trials. However, there are still many therapeutic drugs that have not been directly compared and studied. Therefore, it is difficult to directly compare the effectiveness and safety of various strategies for the treatment of DILI. In this regard, the present study collected the therapeutic efficacy of diverse treatments in DILI in recent years through network meta-analysis, evaluated and screened the existing optimal clinical therapeutic plan, and helped physicians formulate clinical therapeutic plans.

METHODS

Databases, including the Chinese Journal Full-text Database, Wanfang Data Journal Paper Resources (Wangfang), VIP Chinese Science and Technology Journal Full-text Database, The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE, were searched using keywords from inception to January 2023. Eligible randomized controlled trials were selected in line with eligibility criteria, and mesh meta-analysis of binary variables was carried out using Stata 16 software.

CONCLUSION

In combination with alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and total bilirubin, MI may be the intervention measure for minimizing alanine aminotransferase levels in patients after treatment. Besides, compound glycyrrhizin may be the intervention for minimizing aspartate aminotransferase levels in patients after treatment, and polyene phosphatidylcholine may be the intervention for minimizing total bilirubin levels in patients after treatment. Placebo is the potential intervention that has the least adverse reactions post-treatment, and RT has the second least adverse reactions. Moreover, hepatocyte growth-promoting factors may be the most effective intervention after treatment.

RESULTS

To sum up, the present work compared the clinical effects of 13 liver protective drugs through meta-analysis and provided a systematic understanding of commonly used drugs for the treatment of DILI in clinical practice.

Hepatotoxicity reports in the FDA adverse event reporting system database: A comparison of drugs that cause injury via mitochondrial or other mechanisms

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a leading reason for preclinical safety attrition and post-market drug withdrawals. Drug-induced mitochondrial toxicity has been shown to play an essential role in various forms of DILI, especially in idiosyncratic liver injury. This study examined liver injury reports submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) for drugs associated with hepatotoxicity via mitochondrial mechanisms compared with non-mitochondrial mechanisms of toxicity. The frequency of hepatotoxicity was determined at a group level and individual drug level. A reporting odds ratio (ROR) was calculated as the measure of effect. Between the two DILI groups, reports for DILI involving mitochondrial mechanisms of toxicity had a 1.43 (95% CI 1.42-1.45; P < 0.0001) times higher odds compared to drugs associated with non-mitochondrial mechanisms of toxicity. Antineoplastic, antiviral, analgesic, antibiotic, and antimycobacterial drugs were the top five drug classes with the highest ROR values. Although the top 20 drugs with the highest ROR values included drugs with both mitochondrial and non-mitochondrial injury mechanisms, the top four drugs (ROR values > 18: benzbromarone, troglitazone, isoniazid, rifampin) were associated with mitochondrial mechanisms of toxicity. The major demographic influence for DILI risk was also examined. There was a higher mean patient age among reports for drugs that were associated with mitochondrial mechanisms of toxicity [56.1 ± 18.33 (SD)] compared to non-mitochondrial mechanisms [48 ± 19.53 (SD)] (P < 0.0001), suggesting that age may play a role in susceptibility to DILI via mitochondrial mechanisms of toxicity. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that reports of liver injury were 2.2 (odds ratio: 2.2, 95% CI 2.12-2.26) times more likely to be associated with older patient age, as compared with reports involving patients less than 65 years of age. Compared to males, female patients were 37% less likely (odds ratio: 0.63, 95% CI 0.61-0.64) to be subjects of liver injury reports for drugs associated with mitochondrial toxicity mechanisms. Given the higher proportion of severe liver injury reports among drugs associated with mitochondrial mechanisms of toxicity, it is essential to understand if a drug causes mitochondrial toxicity during preclinical drug development when drug design alternatives, more clinically relevant animal models, and better clinical biomarkers may provide a better translation of drug-induced mitochondrial toxicity risk assessment from animals to humans. Our findings from this study align with mitochondrial mechanisms of toxicity being an important cause of DILI, and this should be further investigated in real-world studies with robust designs.