Immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly patients treated for a lung cancer: a narrative review

Real-world data on the first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors or in combination with chemotherapy in older patients (aged ≥ 75 years) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or plus with chemotherapy in older patients.

Methods

We enrolled 110 older patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC ≥75 years) who received either chemotherapy alone (chemo), ICI plus chemotherapy (ICI + chemo), or ICI alone and ICI plus other therapies, which included anti-angiogenesis drugs or other novel ICI (ICIs). Patient characteristics, treatment response, survival, and toxicity were evaluated.

Results

In total population, the ICIs group has the highest disease control rate (DCR 75%). There were no significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among older patients between ICI + chemo and ICIs groups (PFS: 5.3 months vs. 5.5 months, p = 0.70, OS: 10.7 months vs. 20.3 months, p = 0.995). Meanwhile, we observed ICIs had a longer PFS and OS than chemo group (PFS: 3.9 months vs. 5.5 months, p = 0.01, OS: 10.9 months vs. 20.3 months, p = 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed that patients with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) ≥ 1% had a distinct longer trend toward OS in ICIs group compared to ICI + chemo group (22.4 months vs. 10.7 months, p = 0.605), even though there was no significant difference. In terms of safety, ICIs was more tolerable and had a lower discontinuation rate than ICI + chemo group.

Conclusion

In the real world, ICI + chemo is more likely to be discontinued due to adverse effects and does not significantly improve patient survival compared with ICIs treatment in total population and subgroup. Therefore, ICI alone or ICIs plus other therapies, such as anti-angiogenesis drugs or other novel ICI (ICIs) could be recommended for older cases with PD-L1 positive NSCLC.

Immunosenescence and immunotherapy in older NSCLC patients

Nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) predominantly affects the elderly since its incidence and mortality rates skyrocket beyond the age of 65. The landscape of NSCLC treatment has been revolutionized by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which have emerged after a long and mostly inactive period of conventional treatment protocols. However, there is limited data on the exact effects of these chemicals on older patients, whose care can be complicated by a variety of conditions. This highlights the need to understand the efficacy of emerging cancer medicines in older patients. In this study, we will review the data of ICIs from clinical trials that were relevant to older people with NSCLC and poor performance status. We will also discuss the role of immunosenescence in immunotherapy and biomarkers in predicting the efficacy of ICIs in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Effectiveness and safety of camrelizumab in inoperable or advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: a multicenter real-world retrospective observational study (CTONG2004-ADV)

Background

Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy have been approved as standards for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients based on two phase III trials. However, clinical trial results may not be representative of the general population, as clinical trials often have specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Our research aims to investigate the real-world effectiveness and safety of camrelizumab in inoperable or advanced NSCLC patients.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective observational study included inoperable or advanced pathologically confirmed NSCLC patients who received at least one dose of camrelizumab at 22 hospitals. Clinical and follow-up data of camrelizumab were collected retrospectively from the medical records. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR) and secondary outcomes were disease control rate (DCR), 6-month progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Multivariate logistic and Cox regression analyses were applied to identify potential predictive factors of ORR and PFS, respectively.

Results

Between July 2019 and March 2021, 336 patients were included. Adenocarcinoma was seen in 58.4% and stage IV disease in 69.3%. Twenty-nine (8.6%) had liver metastasis at baseline. Most patients received camrelizumab in the first-line setting (74.1%) and in combination with chemotherapy (60.7%). The ORR was 40.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 34.9-45.6%] and DCR was 85.1% (95% CI: 81.3-88.9%), while the 6-month PFS and OS rates were 73.0% (95% CI: 67.1-78.0%) and 93.1% (95% CI: 89.8-95.4%), respectively. In multivariate analyses, liver metastasis [odds ratio (OR), 0.324; 95% CI: 0.115-0.915; P=0.033] and increasing lines of camrelizumab treatment (vs. first line, second line: OR, 0.347; 95% CI: 0.162-0.741; P=0.006; ≥ third line: OR, 0.126; 95% CI: 0.043-0.367; P<0.001) were negatively associated, while a longer duration of camrelizumab treatment was positively associated with ORR and PFS. TRAEs were recorded in 164 (48.8%) patients, without new safety signal.

Conclusions

We conducted a comprehensive overview of the effectiveness and safety profile of camrelizumab in a broader NSCLC population in real world NSCLC patients, and subgroup analysis indicated the presence of liver metastasis was associated with worse outcomes.

Age-dependent genomic characteristics and their impact on immunotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The incidence of lung cancer tends to be younger, and adenocarcinoma is the main histological type. Even patients with the same tumor type may have significant differences in clinical features, tumor microenvironment and genomic background at different ages. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been shown to improve clinical outcomes in patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). However, differences in ICI efficacy between older and younger patients are unknown. Our study aimed to explore the relationship between age and immunotherapy in LUAD.

METHODS

In our study, 1313 resected LUAD patients in our hospital were divided into young (age ≤ 50) and old groups (age > 50), and the clinical characteristic differences between them were analyzed. Of these, next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on the 311 cases. In addition, immune-related signatures of 508 LUAD patients were analyzed by TCGA RNA expression data. Then, we validated genomic and clinical information of 270 LUAD samples in the MSKCC cohort.

RESULTS

ERBB2 and EGFR gene mutations were significantly different between the two groups, and the gene mutation number in the old group was significantly higher than that in the young group. In addition, immune-related signatures of LUAD patients were analyzed by TCGA RNA expression data, which indicated that the patients in the old group might have a better immune microenvironment. Then, we validated the MSKCC cohort and found that the TMB of the old group was significantly higher than that of the young group, and the OS of immunotherapy was longer in the old group.

CONCLUSION

Our study was the first to analyze the differences in the genomic landscape and immune-related biomarkers between the young and old groups of LUAD patients and found that the old group had a better efficacy of immunotherapy, providing a reference for the study design and treatment of patients with LUAD.

High expression of HOXB3 predicts poor prognosis and correlates with tumor immunity in lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is one of the most prevalent human cancers worldwide. The homeobox-B (HOXB) gene cluster has been reported to contribute to cancer development. Nevertheless, the expression status, clinical significance and biological role of HOXB genes in LUAD remain largely unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study comprehensively investigated the transcriptional levels and prognostic values of the HOXB genes in LUAD based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Flow cytometry, CCK-8, and Transwell assays were used for detecting apoptosis, proliferation, and migration, respectively. We discovered that eight members of the HOXB cluster genes (HOXB2, HOXB3, HOXB4, HOXB6, HOXB7, HOXB8, HOXB9, and HOXB13) were dysregulated in LUAD tumor tissues. Increased expression of HOXB3, HOXB6, HOXB7, HOXB8, or HOXB9 was independently associated with unsatisfactory overall survival (OS) in LUAD patients. In addition, a high level of HOXB3 also predicted poor patient relapse-free survival (RFS), suggesting that HOXB3 may play a vital role in the progression of LUAD compared to other members of the HOXB cluster. Additionally, further analysis by TIMER and TISIDB algorithms revealed that HOXB3 was positively correlated with a panel of immune checkpoint molecules (ICMs), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and tumor immune regulators (TIRs). Gene enrichment analysis based on KEGG showed that HOXB3 was closely associated with multiple tumor-related biological processes and signaling pathways. Functionally, the in vitro experiments revealed that depletion of HOXB3 significantly alleviated the resistance of LUAD cells to apoptosis, and suppressed cell proliferation and migration.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that HOXB3 may play an oncogenic role in LUAD and correlate with tumor immunity.