Diagnosis-to-surgery interval and survival for different histologies of stage I-IIA lung cancer

Factors Associated With Delay in Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Surgery in a Lung Cancer Screening Program

PURPOSE

Delays to biopsy and surgery after lung nodule detection can impact survival from lung cancer. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with delay in a lung cancer screening (LCS) program.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated patients in an LCS program from May 2015 through October 2021 with a malignant lung nodule classified as lung CT screening reporting and data system (Lung-RADS) 4B/4X. A cutoff of more than 30 days between screening computed tomography (CT) and first tissue sampling and a cutoff of more than 60 days between screening CT and surgery were considered delayed. We evaluated the relationship between delays to first tissue sampling and surgery and patient sex, age, race, smoking status, median income by zip code, language, Lung-RADS category, and site of surgery (academic vs community hospital).

RESULTS

A total of 185 lung cancers met the inclusion criteria, of which 150 underwent surgical resection. The median time from LCS CT to first tissue sampling was 42 days, and the median time from CT to surgery was 52 days. 127 (69%) patients experienced a first tissue sampling delay and 60 (40%) had a surgical delay. In multivariable analysis, active smoking status was associated with delay to first tissue sampling (odds ratio: 3.0, CI: 1.4-6.6, P = 0.005). Only performing enhanced diagnostic CT of the chest before surgery was associated with delayed lung cancer surgery (odds ratio: 30, CI: 3.6-252, P = 0.02). There was no statistically significant difference in delays with patients' sex, age, race, language, or Lung-RADS category.

CONCLUSION

Delays to first tissue sampling and surgery in a LCS program were associated with current smoking and performing diagnostic CT before surgery.

Impact of time-to-treatment initiation on survival in single primary non-small cell lung Cancer: A population-based study

Background

Understanding the effects of a delayed time-to-treatment initiation(TTI) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is vital.

Methods

We analyzed NSCLC data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, focusing on lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous carcinoma (LUSC). TTI was studied as both continuous and dichotomous variables. Restricted cubic splines were employed to identify potential nonlinear dependency between the hazard ratio (HR) and TTI. Propensity score matching was used to ensure a balanced patient allocation, and then survival differences between groups were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and competing risk models. We used overall survival (OS) as the primary outcome and cancer-specific cumulative mortality (CSCM) as a complementary indicator. Finally, sensitivity analyses were performed on censored data.

Results

A total of 80,020 with NSCLC were analyzed. TTI was assessed as a continuous variable, showing a noticeable increase in the HR for stage I to II NSCLC with TTI >1 month. Conversely, the trend for stage III to IV NSCLC was the opposite. In stage I LUAD, the 'early' group demonstrated a higher OS compared to the 'delayed' group (Log-rank P = 0.002), while there was no significant difference in CSCM (Fine-gray P = 0.321). In stage I LUSC, there was no significant difference in OS(Log-rank P = 0.260), but the 'early' group had a lower CSCM (Fine-gray P = 0.018). For stage II-IV NSCLC, the 'delayed' group did not exhibit a negative impact on OS or CSCM. The sensitivity analysis further supported the results of the main analysis.

Conclusion

Prolongation of TTI ≥31 days has a negative impact on OS or CSCM in stage I NSCLC only. Further exploration and validation are needed to determine whether these results can be used as evidence for a 'safe' TTI threshold setting for future NSCLC.

Association of Surgical Timing with Outcomes in Early Stage Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Optimal time to surgery for lung cancer is not well established. We aimed to assess whether time to surgery correlates with outcomes.

METHODS

We assessed patients 18-84 years old who were diagnosed with stage I/II lung cancer at our integrated healthcare system from 2009 to 2019. Time to surgery was defined to start with disease confirmation (imaging or biopsy) prior to the surgery scheduling date. Outcomes of unplanned return to care within 30 days of lung cancer surgery, all-cause mortality, and disease recurrence were compared based on time to surgery before and after 2, 4, and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Of 2861 included patients, 70% were over 65 years old and 61% were female. Time to surgery occurred in 1-2 weeks for 6%, 3-4 weeks for 31%, 5-12 weeks for 58%, and 13-26 weeks for 5% of patients. Patients with time to surgery > 4 (vs. ≤ 4) weeks had greater risk of both death (hazard ratio (HR) 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00-1.39) and recurrence (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.10-1.62). Associations were not statistically significant when dichotomizing time to surgery at 2 or 12 weeks for death (2 week HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.93-1.64; 12 week HR 1.35, 95% CI 0.97-1.88) and recurrence (2 week HR 1.54, 95% CI 0.85-2.80; 12 week HR 2.28, 95% CI 0.80-6.46).

CONCLUSIONS

Early stage lung cancer patients with time to surgery within 4 weeks experienced lower rates of recurrence. Optimal time to surgical resection may be shorter than previously reported.

Development and validation of a novel nomogram to predict the overall survival of patients with large cell lung cancer: A surveillance, epidemiology, and end results population-based study

Background

Large cell lung cancer (LCLC) is a rare subtype of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), and little is known about its clinical and biological characteristics.

Methods

LCLC patient data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015. All patients were randomly divided into a training group and a validation group at a ratio of 7:3. The independent prognostic factors that were identified (P < 0.01) by stepwise multivariate Cox analysis were incorporated into an overall survival (OS) prediction nomogram, and risk-stratification systems, C-index, time-ROC, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were applied to evaluate the quality of the model.

Results

Nine factors were incorporated into the nomogram: age, sex, race, marital status, 6th AJCC stage, chemotherapy, radiation, surgery and tumor size. The C-index of the predicting OS model in the training dataset and in the test dataset was 0.757 ± 0.006 and 0.764 ± 0.009, respectively. The time-AUCs exceeded 0.8. The DCA curve showed that the nomogram has better clinical value than the TNM staging system.

Conclusions

Our study summarized the clinical characteristics and survival probability of LCLC patients, and a visual nomogram was developed to predict the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year OS of LCLC patients. This provides more accurate OS assessments for LCLC patients and helps clinicians make personal management decisions.

Timeliness of Lung Cancer Care From the Point of Suspicious Image at an Urban Safety Net Hospital

BACKGROUND

Timeliness of care is an important metric for lung cancer patients, and care delays in the safety-net setting have been described. Timeliness from the point of the suspicious image is not well-studied. Herein, we evaluate time intervals in the workup of lung cancer at an urban, safety net hospital and assess for disparities by demographic and clinical factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of lung cancer patients receiving some portion of their care at Boston Medical Center between 2015 and 2020. A total of 687 patients were included in the final analysis. Median times from suspicious image to first treatment (SIT), suspicious image to diagnosis (SID), and diagnosis to treatment (DT) were calculated. Nonparametric tests were applied to assess for intergroup differences in time intervals.

RESULTS

SIT, SID, and DT for the entire cohort was 78, 34, and 32 days, respectively. SIT intervals were 87 days for females and 72 days for males (p < .01). SIT intervals were 106, 110, 81, and 41 days for stages I, II, III, and IV, respectively (p < .01). SID intervals differed between black (40.5) and Hispanic (45) patients compared to white (28) and Asian (23) patients (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

Advanced stage at presentation and male gender were associated with more timely treatment from the point of suspicious imaging while white and Asian were associated with more timely lung cancer diagnosis. Future analyses should seek to elucidate drivers of timeliness differences and assess for the impact of timeliness disparities on patient outcomes in the safety net setting.

Advances in Intraoperative Flow Cytometry

Flow cytometry is the gold-standard laser-based technique to measure and analyze fluorescence levels of immunostaining and DNA content in individual cells. It provides a valuable tool to assess cells in the G0/G1, S, and G2/M phases, and those with polyploidy, which holds prognostic significance. Frozen section analysis is the standard intraoperative assessment for tumor margin evaluation and tumor resection. Here, we present flow cytometry as a promising technique for intraoperative tumor analysis in different pathologies, including brain tumors, leptomeningeal dissemination, breast cancer, head and neck cancer, pancreatic tumor, and hepatic cancer. Flow cytometry is a valuable tool that can provide substantial information on tumor analysis and, consequently, maximize cancer treatment and expedite patients’ survival.