Impact of tumor programmed death ligand-1 expression on osimertinib efficacy in untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective observational study

Strong PD-L1 affect clinical outcomes in advanced NSCLC treated with third-generation EGFR-TKIs

Background: In first/second generation EGFR-TKIs, strong PD-L1 expression contributes to primary resistance, significantly affecting patient prognosis. The relationship between PD-L1 expression levels and third-generation TKIs remains unclear.Methods: This study analyzed advanced NSCLC who received third-generation EGFR-TKIs as first-line systemic therapy from March 2019 to June 2022. The EGFR and PD-L1 status of the patients was also assessed.Results: Overall, 150 patients were included in this study. PD-L1 expression was negative (PD-L1 tumor proportion score <1%) in 89 cases, weak (1-49%) in 42 cases, and strong (≥50%) in 19 cases. mPFS for patients with negative, weak and strong PD-L1 expressions was 23.60, 26.12 and 16.60 months, respectively. The mPFS for strong PD-L1 expression was significantly shorter than that for with weak PD-L1 expression but was not associated with negativity. The same conclusions were shown in subgroup analyses of mutation types and TKI kinds. In addition, Relative to PD-L1-negative patients, resistance to TKIs may be associated with early progression for patients with strong PD-L1 expression.Conclusion: PD-L1 expression in tumor cells influenced the clinical outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with third-generation EGFR-TKIs. Stronger PD-L1 expression in TKIs-treated patients with advanced first-line EGFR-mutated NSCLC was associated with worse PFS.

Optimizing first-line TKI treatment efficacy in PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutated NSCLC: the impact of antiangiogenic agents

Background

In individuals receiving treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), those exhibiting positive PD-L1 expression might experience reduced progression-free survival (PFS). However, the effects on overall survival (OS) and the determination of efficacious treatment approaches are still not well-defined.

Methods

In our retrospective study, we examined data from 193 NSCLC patients with advanced EGFR mutations who received first-line TKI treatments, treated at two centers of Shaw Hospital in Zhejiang, China. This analysis covered a period from 1 January 2016 to 30 April 2023.

Results

Patients with PD-L1 positivity exhibited a markedly shorter average PFS (9.5 months versus 17.8 months, P < 0.001) and OS (44.4 months versus 65.7 months, P = 0.016) relative to those without PD-L1 expression. This difference in both PFS and OS remained statistically significant even after adjusting for multiple factors (P < 0.001 for PFS and P = 0.028 for OS). In the PD-L1-positive cohort, introducing combination antiangiogenic significantly extended both PFS (from 9.1 to 25.7 months, P = 0.026) and OS (from 42 to 53.5 months, P = 0.03). Post-first-line TKI therapy, 39.3% of PD-L1-positive patients and 54.5% of PD-L1-negative patients developed the T790M mutation (P = 0.212), with no notable difference in PFS from second-line TKI treatments between the groups. Additionally, subsequent combination therapy with immunotherapy markedly prolonged OS in the PD-L1-positive group. However, for PD-L1-negative patients, neither combination antiangiogenic therapy nor later-line immunotherapy demonstrated significant benefits in PFS or OS.

Conclusion

For PD-L1-positive patients, combined antiangiogenic treatments and immunotherapy can significantly improve survival outcomes. In contrast, PD-L1-negative patients show less benefit from these therapies, highlighting the greater efficacy of these treatments in PD-L1-positive individuals.

Comparing the Effectiveness of Afatinib and Osimertinib for Patients With PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutant Non-small Cell Carcinoma

Background/Aim

Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are effective for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations. However, higher tumor programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression is associated with a poor response to EGFR-TKIs, and information on the comparison between afatinib and osimertinib in PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutant NSCLC is scarce.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data of patients with PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutant NSCLC to compare the effectiveness of afatinib and osimertinib.

Results

A total of 177 patients were included in the study. The Cox proportion hazard model was adjusted for age, sex, performance status, EGFR mutation status, PD-L1 expression level, and brain metastasis, revealing that there was no significant difference in risk for progression [hazard ratio (HR)=0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.64-1.53] or death (HR=0.96, 95% CI=0.54-1.73) between afatinib and osimertinib.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the EGFR-TKI treatment duration and overall survival after the treatment with afatinib or osimertinib were similar in patients with PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutant NSCLC in the present study.

Comparison of the efficacy of first‑/second‑generation EGFR‑tyrosine kinase inhibitors and osimertinib for EGFR‑mutant lung cancer with negative or low PD‑L1 expression

In epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with negative or low programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression, the acquisition rate of the T790M mutation is higher after treatment with first-/second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and the progression-free survival (PFS) is longer in patients treated with osimertinib. The present study compared the clinical course after the initiation of each EGFR-TKI monotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with negative or low PD-L1 expression. Data of patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with negative or low PD-L1 expression who were treated with EGFR-TKI monotherapy were retrieved and retrospectively analyzed. Between June 2013 and November 2023, 26 and 29 patients were treated with first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs and osimertinib, respectively. The PFS time was longer in patients treated with osimertinib (median, 22.5 months) than in those treated with first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs (median, 12.9 months). However, the EGFR-TKI treatment duration, defined as the PFS for osimertinib, or the sum of the PFS for first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs and sequential osimertinib therapy after the acquisition of the T790M mutation, was similar between patients treated with first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs (median, 23.0 months) and osimertinib (median, 22.5 months). The Cox proportional hazard model suggested that there was no significant difference in the EGFR-TKI treatment duration between patients treated with first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs and patients treated with osimertinib (hazard ratio, 1.31, 95% CI, 0.55-3.13). In conclusion, first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs and osimertinib were associated with a similar EGFR-TKI treatment duration in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with negative or low PD-L1 expression. The findings suggested that both treatments are promising for this population.

PDL1-status predicts primary resistance of metastatic, EGFR-mutated non small cell lung cancers to EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors

BACKGROUND

EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the reference treatment for metastatic, EGFR-mutated, non-small-cell lung cancers (EGFRm NSCLCs). However, 16-20% of those tumors progress early (3-6 months) and factors predicting that resistance are unknown. This study was undertaken to examine PDL1 status as such a factor.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included metastatic, EGFRm-NSCLC patients who received first-line 1st-, 2nd- or 3rd-generation EGFR TKIs with PDL1 expression determined in pretreatment biopsies. Kaplan-Meier estimations of probabilities of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared with log-rank test, and logistic-regression analyses.

RESULTS

PDL1 status of the 145 included patients was ≥1% (47%), 1-49% (33%) or ≥50% (14%). For PDL1-positive vs PDL1-negative patients, respectively, median PFS lasted 8 (95% CI: 6-12) vs 12 (95% CI: 11-17) months (p = 0.008), with 18% vs. 8% (NS) of NSCLCs progressing at 3 months, and 47% vs. 18% (HR 0.25 [95% CI 0.10-0.566], p<0.001) at 6 months. Multivariate analysis retained 1st- or 2nd-generation EGFR TKI, brain metastases and albuminemia <35 g/L at diagnosis as significantly associated with shorter PFS, but not PDL1 status, which was independently associated with progression at 6 months (HR 3.76 [1.23-12.63], p = 0.02). PDL1-negative and PDL1-positive patients' OS lasted 27 (95% CI 24-39) and 22 (95% CI 19-41) months, respectively (NS). Multivariate analysis retained only brain metastases or albuminemia <35 g/L at diagnosis as being independently associated with OS.

CONCLUSION

PDL1 expression ≥1% seems to be associated with early progression during the first 6 months of first-line EGFR-TKI treatment of metastatic EGFRm NSCLCs, without impacting OS.

Tailoring Therapeutic Strategies in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Role of Genetic Mutations and Programmed Death Ligand-1 Expression in Survival Outcomes

BACKGROUND

This study aims to assess the real-world impact of advancements in first-line systemic therapies for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), focusing on the role of driver gene mutations and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression levels.

METHODS

Conducted across eight medical facilities in Japan, this multicenter, retrospective observational research included 863 patients diagnosed with NSCLC and treated between January 2015 and December 2022. The patients were categorized based on the type of systemic therapy received: cytotoxic agents, molecular targeting agents, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and combination therapies. Comprehensive molecular and immunohistochemical analyses were conducted, and statistical evaluations were performed.

RESULTS

The median overall survival (OS) shows significant variations among treatment groups, with targeted therapies demonstrating the longest OS. This study also revealed that high PD-L1 expression was common in the group treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Multivariate analysis was used to identify the type of anticancer drug and the expression of PD-L1 at diagnosis as the impactful variables affecting 5-year OS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores the efficacy of targeted therapies and the critical role of comprehensive molecular diagnostics and PD-L1 expression in affecting OS in NSCLC patients, advocating for their integration into routine clinical practice.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of First- or Second-Generation EGFR-TKIs after Osimertinib Resistance for EGFR Mutated Lung Cancer: A Prospective Exploratory Study

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib monotherapy is a common treatment for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, standard treatment strategies for acquired resistance to this drug have not been established. In addition, the clinical significance of first-generation (1G) or second-generation (2G) EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and osimertinib resistance has not yet been fully evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to conduct a prospective multicenter observational study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 1G and 2G EGFR-TKIs after the development of osimertinib resistance.

METHODS

Patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received 1G or 2G EGFR-TKIs after developing resistance to osimertinib monotherapy were prospectively assessed at eight institutions in Japan. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

A total of 29 patients with advanced or recurrent EGFR-mutant NSCLC were analyzed. The objective response and disease control rates were 6.9% (2/29) and 58.6% (17/29), respectively. The median PFS was 1.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3-5.3]. There was no significant difference in PFS between the 1G and 2G EGFR-TKI groups (3.7 versus 1.5 months, log-rank test p = 0.20). However, patients with normal cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) and pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) levels experienced longer PFS than those with elevated CYFRA 21-1 and/or ProGRP (5.5 versus 1.3 months, log-rank test p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Administration of 1G or 2G EGFR-TKIs after the development of osimertinib resistance has limited efficacy in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Moreover, normal CYFRA 21-1 and ProGRP levels could be promising indicators for 1G and 2G EGFR-TKI administration after osimertinib resistance development.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000044049.

A protocol of a single arm, prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase II study of ramucirumab and erlotinib in treatment-naïve non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutation and brain metastases (SPIRAL-BRAIN study)

Background

The combination of erlotinib, a first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), and ramucirumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) antibody, is one of the most effective treatments for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and EGFR mutation. However, little is known about the safety and efficacy of this combination treatment for patients with brain metastases.

Methods

This single arm, prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase II study will recruit 32 NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation (except for T790M mutation) and brain metastases (asymptomatic or mild symptoms). Patients will be treated with erlotinib at a dose of 150 mg/body once daily and ramucirumab at a dose of 10 mg/kg once every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint is intracranial overall response rate (iORR) and the secondary endpoints are intracranial disease control rate, intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), extracranial ORR, extracranial PFS, ORR, overall PFS, overall survival (OS), and safety. The planned number of enrollments was calculated based on a one-sample binomial test (normal approximation) with a two-sided α level of 5% and 80% power, assuming that the expected iORR is 65% and the iORR threshold is 40%.

Discussion

A prospective study to confirm the safety and efficacy of the combined erlotinib plus ramucirumab treatment for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation and brain metastases is ongoing.

Trial Registration

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs051220059.

A retrospective study of the efficacy of combined EGFR‑TKI plus VEGF inhibitor/cytotoxic therapy vs. EGFR‑TKI monotherapy for PD‑L1‑positive EGFR‑mutant non‑small cell lung cancer: North Japan Lung Cancer Study Group 2202

The present multicenter study was performed to compare the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) monotherapy with that of combined EGFR-TKI plus vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGF) inhibitor/cytotoxic therapy in patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data from patients with PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutant NSCLC were collected from 12 institutes. Survival in patients treated with first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs, osimertinib (third-generation EGFR-TKI), and combined EGFR-TKI plus VEGF inhibitor/cytotoxic therapy was analyzed by multiple regression analysis with adjustments for sex, performance status, EGFR mutation status, PD-L1 expression level, and the presence or absence of brain metastasis using a Cox proportional hazards model. Data from a total of 263 patients were analyzed, including 111 (42.2%) patients who had received monotherapy with a first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI, 132 (50.2%) patients who had received osimertinib monotherapy, and 20 (7.6%) patients who had received combined EGFR-TKI plus VEGF inhibitor/cytotoxic therapy (hereafter referred to as combined therapy). Multiple regression analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model showed that the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for progression-free survival was 0.73 (0.54-1.00) in the patients who had received osimertinib monotherapy and 0.47 (0.25-0.90) in patients who had received combined therapy. The hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.98 (0.65-1.48) in the patients who had received osimertinib monotherapy and 0.52 (0.21-1.31) in patients who had received combined therapy. In conclusion, combined therapy was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of progression compared with first- and second-generation EGFR-TKI monotherapy, and therefore, may be promising for the treatment of patients of NSCLC.

Rationale and design of phase II clinical trial of dual inhibition with ramucirumab and erlotinib in EGFR exon 19 deletion-positive treatment-naïve non-small cell lung cancer with high PD-L1 expression (SPIRAL-3D study)

Background

Osimertinib is a standard treatment option for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, osimertinib monotherapy yields poor clinical outcomes in some patients, necessitating the development of novel treatment strategies. In addition, several studies have suggested that high programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is associated with poor progression-free survival (PFS) for osimertinib monotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations.

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of erlotinib plus ramucirumab for EGFR exon 19 deletion-positive treatment-naïve NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression.

Design

A single-arm, prospective, open-label, phase II study.

Methods and Analysis

Patients with treatment-naïve EGFR exon 19 deletion-positive NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression and a performance status of 0-2 will receive combination therapy with erlotinib plus ramucirumab until evidence of disease progression or development of unacceptable toxicity. High PD-L1 expression is defined as a tumor proportion score of 50% or higher, as determined by PD-L1 immunohistochemistry 22C3 pharmDx testing. The Kaplan-Meier method and the Brookmeyer and Crowley method with the arcsine square-root transformation will be used with PFS as the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints include overall response rate, disease control rate, overall survival, and safety. A total of 25 patients will be enrolled.

Ethics

The study has been approved by the Clinical Research Review Board, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan, and written informed consent will be obtained from all patients.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first clinical trial to focus on PD-L1 expression in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. If the primary end point is met, combination therapy with erlotinib and ramucirumab could become a potential treatment option for this clinical population.

Trial Registration

This trial was registered with the Japan Registry for Clinical Trials on 12 January 2023 (jRCTs 051220149).

Biomarkers and factors in small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this meta-analysis was to summarize the available results of immunotherapy predictors for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and to provide evidence-based information for their potential predictive value of efficacy.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials (from January 1, 1975 to November 1, 2021). The hazard ratios (HR) and its 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and tumor response rate of the included studies were extracted.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were eventually included and the pooled results showed that programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive: objective response rate (ORR) (relative risk [RR] = 1.39, 95% CI [0.48, 4.03], p = 0.54), with high heterogeneity (p = 0.05, I²  = 56%); disease control rate [DCR] (RR = 1.31, 95% CI [0.04, 38.57], p = 0.88), with high heterogeneity (p = 0.04, I²  = 75%); overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.89, 95% CI [0.74, 1.07], p = 0.22); and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.59, 1.16], p = 0.27), with high heterogeneity (p = 0.005, I²  = 73.1%). TMB-High (TMB-H): OS (HR = 0.86, 95% CI [0.74, 1.00], p = 0.05); PFS (HR = 0.71, 95% CI [0.6, 0.85], p < 0.001). Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) >upper limit of normal (ULN): OS (HR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.81, 1.11], p = 0.511). Asian patients: OS (HR = 0.87, 95% CI [0.72, 1.04], p = 0.135); White/Non-Asian patients: OS (HR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.76, 0.90], p < 0.001). Liver metastasis patients: OS (HR = 0.93, 95% CI [0.83, 1.05], p = 0.229); PFS (HR = 0.84, 95% CI [0.67, 1.06], p = 0.141). Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis patients: OS (HR = 0.91, 95% CI [0.71, 1.17], p = 0.474); PFS (HR = 1.03, 95% CI [0.66, 1.60], p = 0.903).

CONCLUSION

The available research results do not support the recommendation of PD-L1 positive and TMB-H as predictors for the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in SCLC patients. LDH, baseline liver metastasis and CNS metastasis may be used as markers/influencing factors for predicting the efficacy of ICIs in SCLC patients. Non-Asian SCLC patients had better efficacy with ICIs in our results.

High levels of AXL expression in untreated EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer negatively impacts the use of osimertinib

For non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, the initial therapeutic interventions will have crucial impacts on their clinical outcomes. Drug tolerant factors reportedly have an impact on EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor sensitivity. This prospective study investigated the impacts of drug tolerant-related protein expression in tumors based on the efficacy of osimertinib in the first-setting of EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC patients. A total of 92 patients with EGFR-mutated advanced or postoperative recurrent NSCLC were analyzed and treated with osimertinib at 14 institutions in Japan. AXL, p53, and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in patient tumors was determined using immunohistochemistry. The AXL signaling pathway was investigated using a cell line-based assay and AXL-related gene expression in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. High levels of AXL and positive-p53 expression were detected in 26.1% and 53.3% of the pretreatment EGFR-mutated NSCLC tumors, respectively. High AXL expression levels were significantly associated with a shorter progression-free survival compared with low AXL expression levels, irrespective of the EGFR activating mutation status (p = 0.026). Cell line-based assays indicated that the overexpression of AXL protein accelerated PD-L1 expression, which induced insensitivity to osimertinib. In the TCGA database, AXL RNA levels were positively correlated with PD-L1 expression in the lung adenocarcinoma cohort. The results show that high AXL expression levels in tumors impact clinical predictions when using osimertinib to treat EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. Trial Registration: UMIN000043942.

Retrospective analysis of independent predictors of progression‐free survival in patients with EGFR mutation‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer receiving first‐line osimertinib

Background

Clinically measurable factors affecting the progression‐free survival (PFS) of patients receiving osimertinib as first‐line therapy for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have not yet been established.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 61 patients treated with osimertinib as primary therapy for EGFR mutation‐positive advanced NSCLC at Yokohama City University Medical Center between August 2018 and March 2022. Our objective was to identify the independent predictors of PFS.

Results

The median age of participants was 74 years. Overall, 73.8% had good (0–1) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS), and 98.4% had histology of adenocarcinoma. The EGFR mutation was exon19 deletion in 52.5% and exon21 L858R in 44.3% of patients. Programmed death‐ligand 1 tumor proportion score >50% was observed in 21.3% and liver metastasis in 9.9% of patients. Median PFS was 19.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.6–31.6), and overall survival was not reached. The objective response rate was 68.9%, and disease control rate was 93.4%. Multivariate analysis showed that poor PS (2–4) negatively impacted PFS (hazard ratio, 3.79; 95% CI: 1.46–9.87; p = 0.006). Median PFS in the good PS and poor PS groups was 20.4 months (95% CI: 12.4‐not evaluable) and 7.2 months (95% CI: 7.2–19.5), respectively. Interstitial lung disease of all grades and grade 3 was observed as an adverse event in 6.6 and 4.9% of patients, respectively.

Conclusion

Poor PS was associated with poor prognosis in patients with EGFR mutation‐positive advanced NSCLC treated with osimertinib as first‐line therapy.

Association of Tumor PD-L1 Expression With Time on Treatment Using EGFR-TKIs in Patients With EGFR-Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

The association between tumor PD-L1 expression and the rate of acquisition of the T790M mutation during treatment with first-/second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) is a matter of study. This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the association of tumor PD-L1 expression with the time on treatment under EGFR-TKIs in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), treated with first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of the medical charts of patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with first- /second-generation EGFR-TKIs. Time on treatment with EGFR-TKIs was defined as the sum of progression-free survival period (PFS) from the start of treatment with first- /second-generation EGFR-TKIs and the PFS from the start of osimertinib treatment after acquisition of the T790M mutation. Tumor PD-L1 expression was evaluated using the 22C3 antibody.

RESULTS

Data of a total of 49 patients were analyzed, including 20 patients with negative tumor PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score <1%) and 29 patients with positive tumor PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score ≥1%). In the negative tumor PD-L1 expression group, the T790M mutation was detected in 12 (75%) of the 16 patients. In the positive tumor PD-L1 expression group, the T790M mutation was detected 6 (31.6%) out of the 19 patients in whom it was tested. The median (95% confidence interval) time on treatment with EGFR-TKIs was 21.7 (12.9-24.8) months and 12.3 (5.6-22.2) months in the negative and positive tumor PD-L1 expression groups, respectively. Analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model identified performance status and presence/absence of tumor PD-L1 expression as significantly associated with the time on treatment with EGFR-TKIs.

CONCLUSION

EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with negative tumor PD-L1 expression showed a higher rate of acquisition of the T790M mutation and implementation rate of osimertinib therapy, leading to a longer time on treatment with EGFR-TKI.