Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery basal segmentectomy: a single-center retrospective cohort study

Application of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for segmentectomy in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: A narrative review

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (UVATS) segmentectomy has emerged as an effective approach for managing early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Compared to conventional open and thoracoscopic surgeries, this minimally invasive surgical technique offers multiple benefits, including reduced postoperative discomfort, shorter hospital stays, expedited recovery, fewer complications, and superior cosmetic outcomes. Particularly advantageous in preserving lung function, UVATS segmentectomy is a compelling option for patients with compromised lung capabilities or limited pulmonary reserve. Notably, it demonstrates promising oncological results in early-stage NSCLC, with long-term survival rates comparable to those of lobectomies. Skilled thoracic surgeons can ensure a safe and effective execution of UVATS despite the potential technical challenges posed by complex tumor locations that may hinder visibility and maneuverability within the thoracic cavity. This study provided a comprehensive review of the literature and existing studies on UVATS segmentectomies. It delves into the evolution of the technique, its current applications, and the balance between its benefits and limitations. This discussion extends the technical considerations, challenges, and prospects of UVATS segmentectomy. Furthermore, it aimed to update advancements in segmentectomy for treating early-stage NSCLC, offering in-depth insights to thoracic surgeons to inform more scientifically grounded and patient-specific surgical decisions.

Identifying the intersegmental plane for segmentectomy using the open insufflation technique

Accurate identification of the intersegmental plane is the key to successful segmentectomy. This case series included 41 patients who underwent uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy using the open insufflation method to identify the intersegmental plane for pulmonary nodules. The median age of the patients was 58 (range 35-73) years, and 63.4% were female. Malignant pulmonary nodules accounted for 80.5% of cases and were staged as 0-IA2. Seventeen patients underwent a single subsegmentectomy or single segmentectomy, and 24 underwent combined subsegmentectomy or subsegmentectomy combined with segmentectomy. There was no conversion to multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, open surgery, or lobectomy. The median operative time was 84 (range 45-194) min, and the median blood loss was 50 (range 10-150) ml. The median chest tube duration and postoperative hospital stay were 2 (range 1 - 7) days. One (2.4%) developed an air leak for >5 days. No deaths occurred within 30 days after surgery.

Clinical applications of minimally invasive uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the field of minimally invasive thoracic surgery has experienced significant advancements driven by improvements in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) techniques and surgical instruments. These advances have given rise to uniportal VATS as a new area of exploration in minimally invasive thoracic surgery. This technique presents several potential advantages, including reduced access trauma, less postoperative pain, improved cosmesis, fewer complications, shorter hospital stays, and faster rehabilitation, ultimately leading to an improvement in patient quality of life.

PURPOSE

This article reviews the evolutionary history of minimally invasive thoracic surgery, highlights novel techniques, explores possible applications and obtained results, and discusses future prospects of uniportal VATS.

CONCLUSION

Experienced thoracic surgeons have demonstrated the capacity to perform uniportal VATS with a high level of safety and efficacy. Further studies are necessary to assess its long-term efficacy, address limitations, and enhance clinical decision-making for optimal treatment of thoracic conditions.

Comparison of uniport versus triport thoracoscopic single or combined basal segmentectomy for stage IA lung cancer

Background

Single or combined basal segmentectomy (CBS), excluding common basal segmentectomy, is the most difficult of all types of segmentectomies. The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and oncological prognosis between uniport thoracoscopic basal segmentectomy (UTBS) and triport thoracoscopic basal segmentectomy (TTBS).

Methods

This study retrospectively collected 300 patients who underwent thoracoscopic single or CBS at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University from April 2015 to May 2022, including 67 and 233 patients in the UTBS and TTBS groups, respectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce confounding bias between the two groups. The primary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS). The secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and perioperative outcomes.

Results

After PSM, the UTBS group (n=64) had significantly less intraoperative blood loss than the TTBS group (n=64) (20 vs. 30 mL, P=0.001). Other perioperative outcomes, including the operation time, number of lymph nodes and lymph node stations harvested, duration of chest tube drainage, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications, were comparable. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the operative time in the group underwent single basal segmentectomy (SBS) was significantly shorter compared to the group underwent CBS (110 vs. 120 min, P=0.002). There were 5 cases of recurrence in the overall cohort and no recurrence in the matched cohort. No deaths were observed in the overall cohort. Therefore, a survival analysis was conducted only for RFS in the overall cohort. The RFS rate and OS rate of the overall cohort were 98.3% and 100%, respectively. The surgical approach (UTBS vs. TTBS) was not an independent risk factor for RFS (HR: 1.120, 95% CI: 0.342-13.051, P=0.879).

Conclusions

UTBS provided similar perioperative outcomes and oncological prognoses compared to TTBS.