Assessment of chromosomal rearrangements helps to differentiate multiple lung primary cancers from metastases

Plasma metabolomics study in screening and differential diagnosis of multiple primary lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) is becoming increasingly common in clinical practice. Imaging examination is sometimes difficult to differentiate from intrapulmonary metastasis (IM) or single primary lung cancer (SPLC) before surgery. There is a lack of effective blood biomarkers as an auxiliary diagnostic method.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

A total of 179 patients who were hospitalized and operated in our department from January to June 2019 were collected, and they were divided into SPLC with 136 patients, MPLC with 24 patients, and IM with 19 patients. In total, 96 healthy people without lung cancer were enrolled. Medical history, imaging, and pathology data were assembled from all participants. Plasma metabolomics analysis was performed by quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry, and data were analyzed using SPSS19.0/Simca 14.1/MetaboAnalyst5.0 software. Significant metabolites were selected by variable importance in projection, P value, and fold change. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate their diagnostic ability.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in plasma metabolite profiles between IM and MPLC. Seven metabolites were screened out. Two metabolites had higher levels in IM, and five metabolites had higher levels in MPLC. All had favorable discriminating capacity. Phosphatidyl ethanolamine (38:5) showed the highest sensitivity (0.95) and specificity (0.92). It was followed by l -histidine with sensitivity 0.92 and specificity 0.84. l -tyrosine can be used to identify SPLC and MPLC. The panel composed of related metabolites exhibited higher diagnostic ability. Eight principal metabolites caused remarkable differences between healthy people and MPLC, and five of them had area under the curves greater than 0.85, showing good discriminating power.

CONCLUSION

Through the study of plasma metabolomics, it was found that there were obvious differences in the metabolite profiles of MPLC, IM, SPLC, and the healthy population. Some discovered metabolites possessed excellent diagnostic competence with high sensitivity and specificity. They had the potential to act as biomarkers for the screening and differential diagnosis of MPLCs.

Comparison of perioperative and survival outcomes between sublobar resection and lobectomy of patients who underwent a second pulmonary resection

Background

Repeat pulmonary resection is widely accepted in clinical practice. This study aimed to compare sublobar resection (segmentectomy or wedge resection) with lobectomy in the treatment of patients who underwent a second pulmonary resection.

Methods

This study retrospectively included patients who underwent lobectomy or sublobar resection for second pulmonary resection. 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance selection bias. Clinicopathological features, perioperative and survival outcomes of lobectomy and sublobar resection were compared.

Results

A total of 308 patients who underwent second pulmonary resection were identified: 71 (23.1%) who underwent lobectomy and 237 (76.9%) who underwent sublobar resection. After PSM, 58 patients for each group were selected with well‐balanced clinicopathological characteristics. In patients who underwent sublobar resection, significantly shorter chest tube duration (days) (median, 4 vs. 2, p < 0.001) and postoperative hospital stay (days) (median, 6 vs. 4, p < 0.001) were observed. There was no significant difference in overall survival between these two groups after the second and first surgery (p = 0.65, p = 0.98), respectively. Subgroup analysis according to the type of the first resection showed consistent results.

Conclusions

Sublobar resection may be considered as an alternative option for second pulmonary resection due to its perioperative advantages and similar survival outcomes compared with lobectomy.