Use of the ductal curvature index to assess the risk of ductal stenting in patients with duct-dependent pulmonary circulation

Stenting of high-tortuous ducts in duct-dependent pulmonary circulation: essential points to consider before deciding on stenting

Despite the advancements in the technique of duct stenting (DS) in patients with duct-dependent pulmonary circulation (DDPC) and the valuable role of DS in preventing the risk of surgical creation of shunts and early repair, not all ducts are amenable to being stented, and not all interventions with DS are safe and can achieve positive outcomes. Very few studies focusing on tortuous ducts have been conducted until now. Their results showed that stenting of highly tortuous ducts has the same risk as surgical options. This type of stenting has greater possibility of complications, early in-stent thrombosis, and stent failure than do other duct types. In such cases, the surgical options could be superior to DS and have better outcomes. This report aims to review the very scarce available data about stenting of high-tortuous ducts and criticisms of performing DS in ducts associated with pulmonary stenosis and to highlight the essential points that must be considered before deciding on intervention.

Efficacy and safety of transcarotid compared to transfemoral approach of patent ductus arteriosus stenting in duct-dependent cyanotic heart disease

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive transcatheter approaches were usually done for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) with duct-dependent pulmonary circulation. There are two ways to establish vascular access, by using transfemoral either femoral vein (FV) or femoral artery (FA) and transcarotid artery (CA) with surgical cutdown approach to access the PDA and then provide good support for the balloon and the stent to be safely deployed. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of transcarotid with surgical cutdown compared to the transfemoral approach of patent ductus arteriosus stenting in duct-dependent cyanotic heart disease.

RESULTS

Overall procedural complication rates were higher in the FA/FV approach than in the CA approach (51% vs. 30%). The incidence of acute limb ischemia in the FA approach is significantly higher than in the CA approach (P < 0.05). No acute thrombosis/occlusion of the carotid artery was assessed by carotid vascular ultrasound in 2-day series.

CONCLUSIONS

The transcarotid approach with surgical cutdown may offer a secure and more efficient means of accessing the PDA, particularly for those emerging from the underside of the aortic arch.

Duct Stenting vs. Modified Blalock-Taussig Shunt: New Insights Learned From High-Risk Patients With Duct-Dependent Pulmonary Circulation

Background

As no data were available on the comparison of outcomes between modified Blalock-Taussig shunts (MBTs) vs. duct-stenting (DS) in patients with pulmonary atresia (PA) and an increased ductal tortuosity and in patients with pulmonary atresia and intact septum (PA-IVS) with right ventricle-dependent coronary circulation (RVDCC), we aimed to perform a single-center retrospective evaluation.

Methods

Between 2010 and 2019, 127 patients with duct-dependent pulmonary circulation (DDPC) underwent either MBTs (without additional repairs) (n = 56) or DS (n = 71). The primary endpoint was defined as arriving at the next planned surgery (Glenn or biventricular repair) avoiding one of the following: (1) unplanned surgery or unplanned perforation of the pulmonary valve (PVP) with a stent, (2) procedure-related permanent complications, and (3) death. Two subgroups were considered: (1) patients who had a ductal curvature index (DCI) >0.45 (n = 32) and (2) patients with PA-IVS and RVDCC (n = 13). Ductal curvature index (DCI) was measured in all the patients to assess the tortuosity of the ducts. Patients with DCI >0.45 were considered as being in a high-risk group for the duct-stenting; a previous study showed that the patients with a DCI < 0.45 had a better outcome when compared with those with a DCI> 0.45.

Results

The primary outcome was achieved equally in the two groups (77.5% in DS, 75% in MBTs). Hospital deaths, need for ECMO, and the occurrence of major complications was more frequent in the group with MBTs with an Odds Ratio (OR) of 5, 0.8, and 4, respectively, and a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.1–22.6, 0.7–0.9, and 1.6–10.3, respectively, and a P-value < 0.05. For the two subgroups, the primary outcome was achieved in 64% of patients with a DCI >0.45 who received MBTs compared to 20% in those with DS (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.2–10, P 0.005). While 74.1% of the patients with PA-IVS and RVDCC after DS had achieved the primary outcome, all patients with MBTs had an impaired outcome (OR 3.5, 95%CI 1–11.2, P 0.004).

Conclusion

MBTs showed a better outcome in patients with tortuous ducts compared to DS. DS seems to be superior in patients with DDPC with DCI <0.45 and patients with PA-IVS with RVDCC.